Cargando…

Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature

Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy was proposed with the aim to improve the cosmesis and reduce the impact on the abdominal wall. Our aim was to analyze the knowledge currently available on this topic with a review of literature and with our experience to suggest patient-centered approach over the use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perini, Davina, Giordano, Alessio, Guagni, Tommaso, Cantafio, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjac136
_version_ 1784681046950805504
author Perini, Davina
Giordano, Alessio
Guagni, Tommaso
Cantafio, Stefano
author_facet Perini, Davina
Giordano, Alessio
Guagni, Tommaso
Cantafio, Stefano
author_sort Perini, Davina
collection PubMed
description Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy was proposed with the aim to improve the cosmesis and reduce the impact on the abdominal wall. Our aim was to analyze the knowledge currently available on this topic with a review of literature and with our experience to suggest patient-centered approach over the use of minilaparoscopic cholecystectomies and appendectomies. From January 2021 to October 2021, we performed 21 minilaparoscopic cholecystectomies and 12 minilaparoscopic appendectomies. Within the established 1-month and 3-month follow-up intervals, clinical examination and scar evaluation were assessed and a satisfaction questionnaire was completed by all the patients. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. Patients’ pain decreases significantly during hospital stay and 30 patients (90,1%) were discharged with VAS 0. The same happened with aesthetic score, that was 2,23 the postoperative-day-1, decrease to 1,87 1 week later and was 1,12 at 1- and 3-month follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8978859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89788592022-04-05 Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature Perini, Davina Giordano, Alessio Guagni, Tommaso Cantafio, Stefano J Surg Case Rep Case Series Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy was proposed with the aim to improve the cosmesis and reduce the impact on the abdominal wall. Our aim was to analyze the knowledge currently available on this topic with a review of literature and with our experience to suggest patient-centered approach over the use of minilaparoscopic cholecystectomies and appendectomies. From January 2021 to October 2021, we performed 21 minilaparoscopic cholecystectomies and 12 minilaparoscopic appendectomies. Within the established 1-month and 3-month follow-up intervals, clinical examination and scar evaluation were assessed and a satisfaction questionnaire was completed by all the patients. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. Patients’ pain decreases significantly during hospital stay and 30 patients (90,1%) were discharged with VAS 0. The same happened with aesthetic score, that was 2,23 the postoperative-day-1, decrease to 1,87 1 week later and was 1,12 at 1- and 3-month follow-up. Oxford University Press 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8978859/ /pubmed/35386268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjac136 Text en Published by Oxford University Press and JSCR Publishing Ltd. © The Author(s) 2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Series
Perini, Davina
Giordano, Alessio
Guagni, Tommaso
Cantafio, Stefano
Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature
title Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature
title_full Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature
title_fullStr Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature
title_full_unstemmed Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature
title_short Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature
title_sort minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? a case series and review of literature
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjac136
work_keys_str_mv AT perinidavina minilaparoscopicoverconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyandappendectomyisitworthitacaseseriesandreviewofliterature
AT giordanoalessio minilaparoscopicoverconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyandappendectomyisitworthitacaseseriesandreviewofliterature
AT guagnitommaso minilaparoscopicoverconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyandappendectomyisitworthitacaseseriesandreviewofliterature
AT cantafiostefano minilaparoscopicoverconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyandappendectomyisitworthitacaseseriesandreviewofliterature