Cargando…
Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature
Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy was proposed with the aim to improve the cosmesis and reduce the impact on the abdominal wall. Our aim was to analyze the knowledge currently available on this topic with a review of literature and with our experience to suggest patient-centered approach over the use...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjac136 |
_version_ | 1784681046950805504 |
---|---|
author | Perini, Davina Giordano, Alessio Guagni, Tommaso Cantafio, Stefano |
author_facet | Perini, Davina Giordano, Alessio Guagni, Tommaso Cantafio, Stefano |
author_sort | Perini, Davina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy was proposed with the aim to improve the cosmesis and reduce the impact on the abdominal wall. Our aim was to analyze the knowledge currently available on this topic with a review of literature and with our experience to suggest patient-centered approach over the use of minilaparoscopic cholecystectomies and appendectomies. From January 2021 to October 2021, we performed 21 minilaparoscopic cholecystectomies and 12 minilaparoscopic appendectomies. Within the established 1-month and 3-month follow-up intervals, clinical examination and scar evaluation were assessed and a satisfaction questionnaire was completed by all the patients. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. Patients’ pain decreases significantly during hospital stay and 30 patients (90,1%) were discharged with VAS 0. The same happened with aesthetic score, that was 2,23 the postoperative-day-1, decrease to 1,87 1 week later and was 1,12 at 1- and 3-month follow-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8978859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89788592022-04-05 Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature Perini, Davina Giordano, Alessio Guagni, Tommaso Cantafio, Stefano J Surg Case Rep Case Series Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy was proposed with the aim to improve the cosmesis and reduce the impact on the abdominal wall. Our aim was to analyze the knowledge currently available on this topic with a review of literature and with our experience to suggest patient-centered approach over the use of minilaparoscopic cholecystectomies and appendectomies. From January 2021 to October 2021, we performed 21 minilaparoscopic cholecystectomies and 12 minilaparoscopic appendectomies. Within the established 1-month and 3-month follow-up intervals, clinical examination and scar evaluation were assessed and a satisfaction questionnaire was completed by all the patients. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. Patients’ pain decreases significantly during hospital stay and 30 patients (90,1%) were discharged with VAS 0. The same happened with aesthetic score, that was 2,23 the postoperative-day-1, decrease to 1,87 1 week later and was 1,12 at 1- and 3-month follow-up. Oxford University Press 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8978859/ /pubmed/35386268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjac136 Text en Published by Oxford University Press and JSCR Publishing Ltd. © The Author(s) 2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Series Perini, Davina Giordano, Alessio Guagni, Tommaso Cantafio, Stefano Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature |
title | Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature |
title_full | Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature |
title_fullStr | Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature |
title_short | Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature |
title_sort | minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? a case series and review of literature |
topic | Case Series |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjac136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perinidavina minilaparoscopicoverconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyandappendectomyisitworthitacaseseriesandreviewofliterature AT giordanoalessio minilaparoscopicoverconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyandappendectomyisitworthitacaseseriesandreviewofliterature AT guagnitommaso minilaparoscopicoverconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyandappendectomyisitworthitacaseseriesandreviewofliterature AT cantafiostefano minilaparoscopicoverconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyandappendectomyisitworthitacaseseriesandreviewofliterature |