Cargando…
Strengths Use for Tasks and Relationships in Organizations: Development and Validation of a Strengths Use Scale
Individual character strengths have been increasingly valued, as they facilitate social functioning, well-being, and performance. However, little is known about how individuals use their strengths for important but distinct goals including task accomplishment and relationship maintenance in organiza...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.659046 |
_version_ | 1784681084138553344 |
---|---|
author | Hai, Shenyang Park, In-Jo |
author_facet | Hai, Shenyang Park, In-Jo |
author_sort | Hai, Shenyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Individual character strengths have been increasingly valued, as they facilitate social functioning, well-being, and performance. However, little is known about how individuals use their strengths for important but distinct goals including task accomplishment and relationship maintenance in organizations. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a Strengths Use Scale that can be used to measure the use of strengths for tasks and relationships in the workplace. For this purpose, we used the exploratory mixed-method design and conducted a series of studies. In Study 1, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis to ensure the construct validity of the Strengths Use Scale on a sample of 187 employees. We found that the scale comprises two dimensions: strengths use for tasks and strengths use for relationships. In Study 2a, we verified the two-factor structure of the Strengths Use Scale using the confirmatory factor analysis on a separate sample of 213 employees. The results of Study 2b demonstrated that the scale has good measurement invariance across gender and age groups, on the sample of 205 employees. Moreover, strengths use for tasks and strengths use for relationships positively correlated with well-being and work engagement and negatively correlated with turnover intention, supporting the criterion-related validity of the scale. In Study 3, a test–retest reliability analysis with a sample of 94 employees indicated that the scale has high reliability. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8979025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89790252022-04-05 Strengths Use for Tasks and Relationships in Organizations: Development and Validation of a Strengths Use Scale Hai, Shenyang Park, In-Jo Front Psychol Psychology Individual character strengths have been increasingly valued, as they facilitate social functioning, well-being, and performance. However, little is known about how individuals use their strengths for important but distinct goals including task accomplishment and relationship maintenance in organizations. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a Strengths Use Scale that can be used to measure the use of strengths for tasks and relationships in the workplace. For this purpose, we used the exploratory mixed-method design and conducted a series of studies. In Study 1, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis to ensure the construct validity of the Strengths Use Scale on a sample of 187 employees. We found that the scale comprises two dimensions: strengths use for tasks and strengths use for relationships. In Study 2a, we verified the two-factor structure of the Strengths Use Scale using the confirmatory factor analysis on a separate sample of 213 employees. The results of Study 2b demonstrated that the scale has good measurement invariance across gender and age groups, on the sample of 205 employees. Moreover, strengths use for tasks and strengths use for relationships positively correlated with well-being and work engagement and negatively correlated with turnover intention, supporting the criterion-related validity of the scale. In Study 3, a test–retest reliability analysis with a sample of 94 employees indicated that the scale has high reliability. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8979025/ /pubmed/35386899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.659046 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hai and Park. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Hai, Shenyang Park, In-Jo Strengths Use for Tasks and Relationships in Organizations: Development and Validation of a Strengths Use Scale |
title | Strengths Use for Tasks and Relationships in Organizations: Development and Validation of a Strengths Use Scale |
title_full | Strengths Use for Tasks and Relationships in Organizations: Development and Validation of a Strengths Use Scale |
title_fullStr | Strengths Use for Tasks and Relationships in Organizations: Development and Validation of a Strengths Use Scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Strengths Use for Tasks and Relationships in Organizations: Development and Validation of a Strengths Use Scale |
title_short | Strengths Use for Tasks and Relationships in Organizations: Development and Validation of a Strengths Use Scale |
title_sort | strengths use for tasks and relationships in organizations: development and validation of a strengths use scale |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.659046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haishenyang strengthsusefortasksandrelationshipsinorganizationsdevelopmentandvalidationofastrengthsusescale AT parkinjo strengthsusefortasksandrelationshipsinorganizationsdevelopmentandvalidationofastrengthsusescale |