Cargando…

Comparison of Different Carriers to Maintain a Stable Partial Nitrification Process for Low-Strength Wastewater Treatment

Practical application of the partial nitritation–anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) process has attracted increasing attention because of its low operational costs. However, the nitritation process, as a promising way to supply nitrite for anammox, is sensitive to the variations in substrate con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Kuo, Li, Xinjue, Ni, Shou-Qing, Liu, Sitong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387301
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.851565
_version_ 1784681104235560960
author Zhang, Kuo
Li, Xinjue
Ni, Shou-Qing
Liu, Sitong
author_facet Zhang, Kuo
Li, Xinjue
Ni, Shou-Qing
Liu, Sitong
author_sort Zhang, Kuo
collection PubMed
description Practical application of the partial nitritation–anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) process has attracted increasing attention because of its low operational costs. However, the nitritation process, as a promising way to supply nitrite for anammox, is sensitive to the variations in substrate concentration and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration. Therefore, a stable supply of nitrite becomes a real bottleneck in partial nitritation–anammox process, limiting their potential for application in mainstream wastewater treatment. In this study, five 18-L sequencing batch reactors were operated in parallel at room temperature (22°C ± 4°C) to explore the nitritation performance with different carrier materials, including sepiolite-nonwoven carrier (R1), zeolite-nonwoven carrier (R2), brucite-nonwoven carrier (R3), polyurethane carrier (R4), and nonwoven carrier (R5). The ammonia oxidation rate (AOR) in R1 reached the highest level of 0.174 g-N L(−1) d(−1) in phase II, which was 1.4-fold higher than the control reactor (R4). To guarantee a stable supply of nitrite for anammox process, the nitrite accumulation efficiency (NAE) was always higher than 77%, even though the free ammonia (FA) decreases to 0.08 mg-N/L, and the pH decreases to 6.8 ± 0.3. In phase V, the AOR in R1 reached 0.206 g-N L(−1) d(−1) after the DO content increase from 0.7 ± 0.3 mg/L to 1.7 ± 0.3 mg/L. The NAE in R1 was consistently higher than 68.6%, which was much higher than the other reactor systems (R2: 43.8%, R3: 46.6%, R4: 23.7%, R5: 22.7%). Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed that the relative abundance of Nitrobacter and Nitrospira in R1 was significantly lower than other reactors, indicating that the sepiolite carrier plays an important role in the inhibition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. These results indicate that the sepiolite nonwoven composite carrier can effectively improve the nitritation process, which is highly beneficial for the application of partial nitritation–anammox for mainstream wastewater treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8979113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89791132022-04-05 Comparison of Different Carriers to Maintain a Stable Partial Nitrification Process for Low-Strength Wastewater Treatment Zhang, Kuo Li, Xinjue Ni, Shou-Qing Liu, Sitong Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Practical application of the partial nitritation–anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) process has attracted increasing attention because of its low operational costs. However, the nitritation process, as a promising way to supply nitrite for anammox, is sensitive to the variations in substrate concentration and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration. Therefore, a stable supply of nitrite becomes a real bottleneck in partial nitritation–anammox process, limiting their potential for application in mainstream wastewater treatment. In this study, five 18-L sequencing batch reactors were operated in parallel at room temperature (22°C ± 4°C) to explore the nitritation performance with different carrier materials, including sepiolite-nonwoven carrier (R1), zeolite-nonwoven carrier (R2), brucite-nonwoven carrier (R3), polyurethane carrier (R4), and nonwoven carrier (R5). The ammonia oxidation rate (AOR) in R1 reached the highest level of 0.174 g-N L(−1) d(−1) in phase II, which was 1.4-fold higher than the control reactor (R4). To guarantee a stable supply of nitrite for anammox process, the nitrite accumulation efficiency (NAE) was always higher than 77%, even though the free ammonia (FA) decreases to 0.08 mg-N/L, and the pH decreases to 6.8 ± 0.3. In phase V, the AOR in R1 reached 0.206 g-N L(−1) d(−1) after the DO content increase from 0.7 ± 0.3 mg/L to 1.7 ± 0.3 mg/L. The NAE in R1 was consistently higher than 68.6%, which was much higher than the other reactor systems (R2: 43.8%, R3: 46.6%, R4: 23.7%, R5: 22.7%). Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed that the relative abundance of Nitrobacter and Nitrospira in R1 was significantly lower than other reactors, indicating that the sepiolite carrier plays an important role in the inhibition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. These results indicate that the sepiolite nonwoven composite carrier can effectively improve the nitritation process, which is highly beneficial for the application of partial nitritation–anammox for mainstream wastewater treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8979113/ /pubmed/35387301 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.851565 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhang, Li, Ni and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Zhang, Kuo
Li, Xinjue
Ni, Shou-Qing
Liu, Sitong
Comparison of Different Carriers to Maintain a Stable Partial Nitrification Process for Low-Strength Wastewater Treatment
title Comparison of Different Carriers to Maintain a Stable Partial Nitrification Process for Low-Strength Wastewater Treatment
title_full Comparison of Different Carriers to Maintain a Stable Partial Nitrification Process for Low-Strength Wastewater Treatment
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Carriers to Maintain a Stable Partial Nitrification Process for Low-Strength Wastewater Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Carriers to Maintain a Stable Partial Nitrification Process for Low-Strength Wastewater Treatment
title_short Comparison of Different Carriers to Maintain a Stable Partial Nitrification Process for Low-Strength Wastewater Treatment
title_sort comparison of different carriers to maintain a stable partial nitrification process for low-strength wastewater treatment
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387301
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.851565
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangkuo comparisonofdifferentcarrierstomaintainastablepartialnitrificationprocessforlowstrengthwastewatertreatment
AT lixinjue comparisonofdifferentcarrierstomaintainastablepartialnitrificationprocessforlowstrengthwastewatertreatment
AT nishouqing comparisonofdifferentcarrierstomaintainastablepartialnitrificationprocessforlowstrengthwastewatertreatment
AT liusitong comparisonofdifferentcarrierstomaintainastablepartialnitrificationprocessforlowstrengthwastewatertreatment