Cargando…
Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception
The DRM (Deese–Roediger–McDermott) paradigm produces robust false memories of non-presented critical words. After studying a thematic word list (e.g., bed, rest, and pillow) participants falsely remember the critical item “sleep.” We report two false memory experiments. Study One introduces a novel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.721961 |
_version_ | 1784681144722128896 |
---|---|
author | Toglia, Michael P. Schmuller, Joseph Surprenant, Britni G. Hooper, Katherine C. DeMeo, Natasha N. Wallace, Brett L. |
author_facet | Toglia, Michael P. Schmuller, Joseph Surprenant, Britni G. Hooper, Katherine C. DeMeo, Natasha N. Wallace, Brett L. |
author_sort | Toglia, Michael P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The DRM (Deese–Roediger–McDermott) paradigm produces robust false memories of non-presented critical words. After studying a thematic word list (e.g., bed, rest, and pillow) participants falsely remember the critical item “sleep.” We report two false memory experiments. Study One introduces a novel use of the lexical decision task (LDT) to prime critical words. Participants see two letter-strings and make timed responses indicating whether they are both words. The word pairs Night-Bed and Dream-Thweeb both prime “sleep” but only one pair contains two words. Our primary purpose is to introduce this new methodology via two pilot experiments. The results, considered preliminary, are promising as they indicate that participants were as likely to recognize critical words (false memories) and presented words (true memories) just as when studying thematic lists. Study Two actually employs the standard DRM lists so that semantic priming is in play there as well. The second study, however, uses functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure activity in the prefrontal cortex during a DRM task which includes a deception phase where participants intentionally lie about critical lures. False and true memories occurred at high levels and activated many of the same brain regions but, compared to true memories, cortical activity was higher for false memories and lies. Accuracy findings are accompanied by confidence and reaction time results. Both investigations suggest that it is difficult to distinguish accurate from inaccurate memories. We explain results in terms of activation-monitoring theory and Fuzzy Trace Theory. We provide real world implications and suggest extending the present research to varying age groups and special populations. A nagging question has not been satisfactorily answered: Could neural pathways exist that signal the presence of false memories and lies? Answering this question will require imaging experiments that focus on regions of distinction such as the anterior prefrontal cortex. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8979290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89792902022-04-05 Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception Toglia, Michael P. Schmuller, Joseph Surprenant, Britni G. Hooper, Katherine C. DeMeo, Natasha N. Wallace, Brett L. Front Psychol Psychology The DRM (Deese–Roediger–McDermott) paradigm produces robust false memories of non-presented critical words. After studying a thematic word list (e.g., bed, rest, and pillow) participants falsely remember the critical item “sleep.” We report two false memory experiments. Study One introduces a novel use of the lexical decision task (LDT) to prime critical words. Participants see two letter-strings and make timed responses indicating whether they are both words. The word pairs Night-Bed and Dream-Thweeb both prime “sleep” but only one pair contains two words. Our primary purpose is to introduce this new methodology via two pilot experiments. The results, considered preliminary, are promising as they indicate that participants were as likely to recognize critical words (false memories) and presented words (true memories) just as when studying thematic lists. Study Two actually employs the standard DRM lists so that semantic priming is in play there as well. The second study, however, uses functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure activity in the prefrontal cortex during a DRM task which includes a deception phase where participants intentionally lie about critical lures. False and true memories occurred at high levels and activated many of the same brain regions but, compared to true memories, cortical activity was higher for false memories and lies. Accuracy findings are accompanied by confidence and reaction time results. Both investigations suggest that it is difficult to distinguish accurate from inaccurate memories. We explain results in terms of activation-monitoring theory and Fuzzy Trace Theory. We provide real world implications and suggest extending the present research to varying age groups and special populations. A nagging question has not been satisfactorily answered: Could neural pathways exist that signal the presence of false memories and lies? Answering this question will require imaging experiments that focus on regions of distinction such as the anterior prefrontal cortex. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8979290/ /pubmed/35386904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.721961 Text en Copyright © 2022 Toglia, Schmuller, Surprenant, Hooper, DeMeo and Wallace. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Toglia, Michael P. Schmuller, Joseph Surprenant, Britni G. Hooper, Katherine C. DeMeo, Natasha N. Wallace, Brett L. Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception |
title | Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception |
title_full | Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception |
title_fullStr | Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception |
title_full_unstemmed | Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception |
title_short | Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception |
title_sort | novel approaches and cognitive neuroscience perspectives on false memory and deception |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.721961 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT togliamichaelp novelapproachesandcognitiveneuroscienceperspectivesonfalsememoryanddeception AT schmullerjoseph novelapproachesandcognitiveneuroscienceperspectivesonfalsememoryanddeception AT surprenantbritnig novelapproachesandcognitiveneuroscienceperspectivesonfalsememoryanddeception AT hooperkatherinec novelapproachesandcognitiveneuroscienceperspectivesonfalsememoryanddeception AT demeonatashan novelapproachesandcognitiveneuroscienceperspectivesonfalsememoryanddeception AT wallacebrettl novelapproachesandcognitiveneuroscienceperspectivesonfalsememoryanddeception |