Cargando…

Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization

Chemical risk assessments follow a long-standing paradigm that integrates hazard, dose–response, and exposure information to facilitate quantitative risk characterization. Targeted analytical measurement data directly support risk assessment activities, as well as downstream risk management and comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCord, James P., Groff, Louis C., Sobus, Jon R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.107011
_version_ 1784681147642413056
author McCord, James P.
Groff, Louis C.
Sobus, Jon R.
author_facet McCord, James P.
Groff, Louis C.
Sobus, Jon R.
author_sort McCord, James P.
collection PubMed
description Chemical risk assessments follow a long-standing paradigm that integrates hazard, dose–response, and exposure information to facilitate quantitative risk characterization. Targeted analytical measurement data directly support risk assessment activities, as well as downstream risk management and compliance monitoring efforts. Yet, targeted methods have struggled to keep pace with the demands for data regarding the vast, and growing, number of known chemicals. Many contemporary monitoring studies therefore utilize non-targeted analysis (NTA) methods to screen for known chemicals with limited risk information. Qualitative NTA data has enabled identification of previously unknown compounds and characterization of data-poor compounds in support of hazard identification and exposure assessment efforts. In spite of this, NTA data have seen limited use in risk-based decision making due to uncertainties surrounding their quantitative interpretation. Significant efforts have been made in recent years to bridge this quantitative gap. Based on these advancements, quantitative NTA data, when coupled with other high-throughput data streams and predictive models, are poised to directly support 21st-century risk-based decisions. This article highlights components of the chemical risk assessment process that are influenced by NTA data, surveys the existing literature for approaches to derive quantitative estimates of chemicals from NTA measurements, and presents a conceptual framework for incorporating NTA data into contemporary risk assessment frameworks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8979303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89793032023-01-01 Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization McCord, James P. Groff, Louis C. Sobus, Jon R. Environ Int Article Chemical risk assessments follow a long-standing paradigm that integrates hazard, dose–response, and exposure information to facilitate quantitative risk characterization. Targeted analytical measurement data directly support risk assessment activities, as well as downstream risk management and compliance monitoring efforts. Yet, targeted methods have struggled to keep pace with the demands for data regarding the vast, and growing, number of known chemicals. Many contemporary monitoring studies therefore utilize non-targeted analysis (NTA) methods to screen for known chemicals with limited risk information. Qualitative NTA data has enabled identification of previously unknown compounds and characterization of data-poor compounds in support of hazard identification and exposure assessment efforts. In spite of this, NTA data have seen limited use in risk-based decision making due to uncertainties surrounding their quantitative interpretation. Significant efforts have been made in recent years to bridge this quantitative gap. Based on these advancements, quantitative NTA data, when coupled with other high-throughput data streams and predictive models, are poised to directly support 21st-century risk-based decisions. This article highlights components of the chemical risk assessment process that are influenced by NTA data, surveys the existing literature for approaches to derive quantitative estimates of chemicals from NTA measurements, and presents a conceptual framework for incorporating NTA data into contemporary risk assessment frameworks. 2022-01 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8979303/ /pubmed/35386928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.107011 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
McCord, James P.
Groff, Louis C.
Sobus, Jon R.
Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization
title Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization
title_full Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization
title_fullStr Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization
title_short Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization
title_sort quantitative non-targeted analysis: bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.107011
work_keys_str_mv AT mccordjamesp quantitativenontargetedanalysisbridgingthegapbetweencontaminantdiscoveryandriskcharacterization
AT grofflouisc quantitativenontargetedanalysisbridgingthegapbetweencontaminantdiscoveryandriskcharacterization
AT sobusjonr quantitativenontargetedanalysisbridgingthegapbetweencontaminantdiscoveryandriskcharacterization