Cargando…

Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning

Implicit motor recalibration allows us to flexibly move in novel and changing environments. Conventionally, implicit recalibration is thought to be driven by errors in predicting the sensory outcome of movement (i.e., sensory prediction errors). However, recent studies have shown that implicit recal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsay, Jonathan S., Haith, Adrian M., Ivry, Richard B., Kim, Hyosub E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010005
_version_ 1784681178244055040
author Tsay, Jonathan S.
Haith, Adrian M.
Ivry, Richard B.
Kim, Hyosub E.
author_facet Tsay, Jonathan S.
Haith, Adrian M.
Ivry, Richard B.
Kim, Hyosub E.
author_sort Tsay, Jonathan S.
collection PubMed
description Implicit motor recalibration allows us to flexibly move in novel and changing environments. Conventionally, implicit recalibration is thought to be driven by errors in predicting the sensory outcome of movement (i.e., sensory prediction errors). However, recent studies have shown that implicit recalibration is also influenced by errors in achieving the movement goal (i.e., task errors). Exactly how sensory prediction errors and task errors interact to drive implicit recalibration and, in particular, whether task errors alone might be sufficient to drive implicit recalibration remain unknown. To test this, we induced task errors in the absence of sensory prediction errors by displacing the target mid-movement. We found that task errors alone failed to induce implicit recalibration. In additional experiments, we simultaneously varied the size of sensory prediction errors and task errors. We found that implicit recalibration driven by sensory prediction errors could be continuously modulated by task errors, revealing an unappreciated dependency between these two sources of error. Moreover, implicit recalibration was attenuated when the target was simply flickered in its original location, even though this manipulation did not affect task error – an effect likely attributed to attention being directed away from the feedback cursor. Taken as a whole, the results were accounted for by a computational model in which sensory prediction errors and task errors, modulated by attention, interact to determine the extent of implicit recalibration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8979451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89794512022-04-05 Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning Tsay, Jonathan S. Haith, Adrian M. Ivry, Richard B. Kim, Hyosub E. PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Implicit motor recalibration allows us to flexibly move in novel and changing environments. Conventionally, implicit recalibration is thought to be driven by errors in predicting the sensory outcome of movement (i.e., sensory prediction errors). However, recent studies have shown that implicit recalibration is also influenced by errors in achieving the movement goal (i.e., task errors). Exactly how sensory prediction errors and task errors interact to drive implicit recalibration and, in particular, whether task errors alone might be sufficient to drive implicit recalibration remain unknown. To test this, we induced task errors in the absence of sensory prediction errors by displacing the target mid-movement. We found that task errors alone failed to induce implicit recalibration. In additional experiments, we simultaneously varied the size of sensory prediction errors and task errors. We found that implicit recalibration driven by sensory prediction errors could be continuously modulated by task errors, revealing an unappreciated dependency between these two sources of error. Moreover, implicit recalibration was attenuated when the target was simply flickered in its original location, even though this manipulation did not affect task error – an effect likely attributed to attention being directed away from the feedback cursor. Taken as a whole, the results were accounted for by a computational model in which sensory prediction errors and task errors, modulated by attention, interact to determine the extent of implicit recalibration. Public Library of Science 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8979451/ /pubmed/35320276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010005 Text en © 2022 Tsay et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tsay, Jonathan S.
Haith, Adrian M.
Ivry, Richard B.
Kim, Hyosub E.
Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning
title Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning
title_full Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning
title_fullStr Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning
title_full_unstemmed Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning
title_short Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning
title_sort interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010005
work_keys_str_mv AT tsayjonathans interactionsbetweensensorypredictionerrorandtaskerrorduringimplicitmotorlearning
AT haithadrianm interactionsbetweensensorypredictionerrorandtaskerrorduringimplicitmotorlearning
AT ivryrichardb interactionsbetweensensorypredictionerrorandtaskerrorduringimplicitmotorlearning
AT kimhyosube interactionsbetweensensorypredictionerrorandtaskerrorduringimplicitmotorlearning