Cargando…

Scales for assessing therapeutic adherence and competence in dialectical behaviour therapy for PTSD: development and analysis of psychometric properties

BACKGROUND: The assessment of therapeutic adherence and competence is essential to understand mechanisms that contribute to treatment outcome. Nevertheless, their assessment is often neglected in psychotherapy research. AIMS/OBJECTIVE: To develop an adherence and a treatment-specific competence rati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steil, Regina, Müller-Engelmann, Meike, Stangier, Ulrich, Priebe, Kathlen, Fydrich, Thomas, Weiß, Judith, Dittmann, Clara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2022.2055293
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The assessment of therapeutic adherence and competence is essential to understand mechanisms that contribute to treatment outcome. Nevertheless, their assessment is often neglected in psychotherapy research. AIMS/OBJECTIVE: To develop an adherence and a treatment-specific competence rating scale for Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (DBT-PTSD), and to examine their psychometric properties. Global cognitive behavioural therapeutic competence and disorder-specific therapeutic competence were assessed using already existing scales to confirm their psychometric properties in our sample of patients with PTSD and emotion regulation difficulties. METHOD: Two rating scales were developed using an inductive procedure. 155 videotaped therapy sessions from a multicenter randomised controlled trial were rated by trained raters using these scales, 40 randomly chosen videotapes involving eleven therapists and fourteen patients were doubly rated by two raters. RESULTS: Both the adherence scale (Patient-level ICC = .98; α(s )= .65; α(p)( )= .75) and the treatment-specific competence scale (Patient-level ICC = .98; α(s )= .78; α(p)( )= .82) for DBT-PTSD showed excellent interrater – and good reliability on the patient level. Content validity, including relevance and appropriateness of all items, was confirmed by experts in DBT-PTSD for the new treatment-specific competence scale. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that both scales are reliable instruments. They will be useful to examine possible effects of adherence and treatment-specific competence on DBT-PTSD treatment outcome.