Cargando…

A Dose-Response Relationship Study of Prophylactic Nalbuphine to Reduce Pain During the Awakening Period in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study

PURPOSE: Prophylactic intravenous nalbuphine was administered to observe its median effective dose (ED(50)) in reducing pain after undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy. To investigate the effect of different doses of nalbuphine on postoperative analgesia and adverse reactions in patients. PATI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Min, Wang, Dongyue, Zuo, Jingzhi, Liu, Tianyu, Niu, Zheng, Xie, Juan, Qi, Dunyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386854
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S356582
_version_ 1784681202891882496
author Wang, Min
Wang, Dongyue
Zuo, Jingzhi
Liu, Tianyu
Niu, Zheng
Xie, Juan
Qi, Dunyi
author_facet Wang, Min
Wang, Dongyue
Zuo, Jingzhi
Liu, Tianyu
Niu, Zheng
Xie, Juan
Qi, Dunyi
author_sort Wang, Min
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Prophylactic intravenous nalbuphine was administered to observe its median effective dose (ED(50)) in reducing pain after undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy. To investigate the effect of different doses of nalbuphine on postoperative analgesia and adverse reactions in patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 120 patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy were divided into 6 groups: group C (control) and group P (5 different doses of nalbuphine) with 20 patients per group. The doses of nalbuphine in group P were in an equally proportional series (groups P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5 received doses of 0.280, 0.200, 0.140, 0.100, and 0.070 mg/kg, respectively), diluted to 20 mL with saline and administered 5 min before the induction of anesthesia. A similar volume (20 mL) of saline was administered to group C 5 min before the induction of anesthesia. The numeric rating scale (NRS) of patients during awakening and after surgery, the number of postoperative salvage analgesia, and the occurrence of postoperative adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: The ED(50) (95% confidence interval (CI)) of nalbuphine in preventing pain during the awakening period in patients calculated using the point-slope method was 0.125 (0.108, 0.145) mg/kg. NRS scores differed among the 6 groups at 30 min and 1 h after extubation (P < 0.001; P < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons between groups revealed that, at 30 min after extubation, compared with group P1, the NRS scores of groups P4, P5, and C were higher (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001); compared with group P2, groups P5 and C had higher NRS scores (P = 0.011, P = 0.001). At 1 h after extubation, the NRS scores of groups P1 and P2 were lower than that of group P4 (P = 0.046, P = 0.036). Compared with the control, only the group P1 had a lower cough score (P = 0.009) and there were no differences in the other groups. There were no differences in sedation score at 10 min after extubation, the incidence of adverse events at 24 h postoperatively, or the number of remedial analgesics at 24 h postoperatively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The ED(50) (95% CI) of nalbuphine as a prophylactic in reducing pain during recovery was 0.125 (0.108, 0.145) mg/kg. Compared with the control, nalbuphine at doses of 0.140, 0.200, and 0.280 mg/kg prevented pain during the awakening period. Among these doses, 0.280 mg/kg was determined to be the best, the occurrence of cough was less during extubation and the postoperative analgesic effect was good. However, it is necessary to pay attention to the occurrence of adverse reactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8979566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89795662022-04-05 A Dose-Response Relationship Study of Prophylactic Nalbuphine to Reduce Pain During the Awakening Period in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study Wang, Min Wang, Dongyue Zuo, Jingzhi Liu, Tianyu Niu, Zheng Xie, Juan Qi, Dunyi Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research PURPOSE: Prophylactic intravenous nalbuphine was administered to observe its median effective dose (ED(50)) in reducing pain after undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy. To investigate the effect of different doses of nalbuphine on postoperative analgesia and adverse reactions in patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 120 patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy were divided into 6 groups: group C (control) and group P (5 different doses of nalbuphine) with 20 patients per group. The doses of nalbuphine in group P were in an equally proportional series (groups P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5 received doses of 0.280, 0.200, 0.140, 0.100, and 0.070 mg/kg, respectively), diluted to 20 mL with saline and administered 5 min before the induction of anesthesia. A similar volume (20 mL) of saline was administered to group C 5 min before the induction of anesthesia. The numeric rating scale (NRS) of patients during awakening and after surgery, the number of postoperative salvage analgesia, and the occurrence of postoperative adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: The ED(50) (95% confidence interval (CI)) of nalbuphine in preventing pain during the awakening period in patients calculated using the point-slope method was 0.125 (0.108, 0.145) mg/kg. NRS scores differed among the 6 groups at 30 min and 1 h after extubation (P < 0.001; P < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons between groups revealed that, at 30 min after extubation, compared with group P1, the NRS scores of groups P4, P5, and C were higher (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001); compared with group P2, groups P5 and C had higher NRS scores (P = 0.011, P = 0.001). At 1 h after extubation, the NRS scores of groups P1 and P2 were lower than that of group P4 (P = 0.046, P = 0.036). Compared with the control, only the group P1 had a lower cough score (P = 0.009) and there were no differences in the other groups. There were no differences in sedation score at 10 min after extubation, the incidence of adverse events at 24 h postoperatively, or the number of remedial analgesics at 24 h postoperatively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The ED(50) (95% CI) of nalbuphine as a prophylactic in reducing pain during recovery was 0.125 (0.108, 0.145) mg/kg. Compared with the control, nalbuphine at doses of 0.140, 0.200, and 0.280 mg/kg prevented pain during the awakening period. Among these doses, 0.280 mg/kg was determined to be the best, the occurrence of cough was less during extubation and the postoperative analgesic effect was good. However, it is necessary to pay attention to the occurrence of adverse reactions. Dove 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8979566/ /pubmed/35386854 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S356582 Text en © 2022 Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Wang, Min
Wang, Dongyue
Zuo, Jingzhi
Liu, Tianyu
Niu, Zheng
Xie, Juan
Qi, Dunyi
A Dose-Response Relationship Study of Prophylactic Nalbuphine to Reduce Pain During the Awakening Period in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study
title A Dose-Response Relationship Study of Prophylactic Nalbuphine to Reduce Pain During the Awakening Period in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study
title_full A Dose-Response Relationship Study of Prophylactic Nalbuphine to Reduce Pain During the Awakening Period in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study
title_fullStr A Dose-Response Relationship Study of Prophylactic Nalbuphine to Reduce Pain During the Awakening Period in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed A Dose-Response Relationship Study of Prophylactic Nalbuphine to Reduce Pain During the Awakening Period in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study
title_short A Dose-Response Relationship Study of Prophylactic Nalbuphine to Reduce Pain During the Awakening Period in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study
title_sort dose-response relationship study of prophylactic nalbuphine to reduce pain during the awakening period in patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386854
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S356582
work_keys_str_mv AT wangmin adoseresponserelationshipstudyofprophylacticnalbuphinetoreducepainduringtheawakeningperiodinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopictotalhysterectomyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT wangdongyue adoseresponserelationshipstudyofprophylacticnalbuphinetoreducepainduringtheawakeningperiodinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopictotalhysterectomyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT zuojingzhi adoseresponserelationshipstudyofprophylacticnalbuphinetoreducepainduringtheawakeningperiodinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopictotalhysterectomyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT liutianyu adoseresponserelationshipstudyofprophylacticnalbuphinetoreducepainduringtheawakeningperiodinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopictotalhysterectomyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT niuzheng adoseresponserelationshipstudyofprophylacticnalbuphinetoreducepainduringtheawakeningperiodinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopictotalhysterectomyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT xiejuan adoseresponserelationshipstudyofprophylacticnalbuphinetoreducepainduringtheawakeningperiodinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopictotalhysterectomyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT qidunyi adoseresponserelationshipstudyofprophylacticnalbuphinetoreducepainduringtheawakeningperiodinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopictotalhysterectomyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT wangmin doseresponserelationshipstudyofprophylacticnalbuphinetoreducepainduringtheawakeningperiodinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopictotalhysterectomyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT wangdongyue doseresponserelationshipstudyofprophylacticnalbuphinetoreducepainduringtheawakeningperiodinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopictotalhysterectomyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT zuojingzhi doseresponserelationshipstudyofprophylacticnalbuphinetoreducepainduringtheawakeningperiodinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopictotalhysterectomyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT liutianyu doseresponserelationshipstudyofprophylacticnalbuphinetoreducepainduringtheawakeningperiodinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopictotalhysterectomyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT niuzheng doseresponserelationshipstudyofprophylacticnalbuphinetoreducepainduringtheawakeningperiodinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopictotalhysterectomyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT xiejuan doseresponserelationshipstudyofprophylacticnalbuphinetoreducepainduringtheawakeningperiodinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopictotalhysterectomyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT qidunyi doseresponserelationshipstudyofprophylacticnalbuphinetoreducepainduringtheawakeningperiodinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopictotalhysterectomyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicalstudy