Cargando…
Why both sides of the gender equation matter
Despite efforts to increase gender diversity in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and medicine (STEMM), men continue to hold most tenured and leadership positions. Moreover, the specific population shifts and timelines which may be required to achieve gender parity have not been well del...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35377312 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78890 |
_version_ | 1784681206204334080 |
---|---|
author | Barrett, Lindy E |
author_facet | Barrett, Lindy E |
author_sort | Barrett, Lindy E |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite efforts to increase gender diversity in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and medicine (STEMM), men continue to hold most tenured and leadership positions. Moreover, the specific population shifts and timelines which may be required to achieve gender parity have not been well delineated. It is obvious that if women are statistically underrepresented in a field, then men must be statistically overrepresented: however, male overrepresentation and related gender-based advantages are rarely mentioned in conversations about gender equality. It is important that actions to address both overrepresentation and underrepresentation are elements of any strategy that seeks to move STEMM fields closer to gender parity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8979584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89795842022-04-05 Why both sides of the gender equation matter Barrett, Lindy E eLife Medicine Despite efforts to increase gender diversity in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and medicine (STEMM), men continue to hold most tenured and leadership positions. Moreover, the specific population shifts and timelines which may be required to achieve gender parity have not been well delineated. It is obvious that if women are statistically underrepresented in a field, then men must be statistically overrepresented: however, male overrepresentation and related gender-based advantages are rarely mentioned in conversations about gender equality. It is important that actions to address both overrepresentation and underrepresentation are elements of any strategy that seeks to move STEMM fields closer to gender parity. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8979584/ /pubmed/35377312 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78890 Text en © 2022, Barrett https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Barrett, Lindy E Why both sides of the gender equation matter |
title | Why both sides of the gender equation matter |
title_full | Why both sides of the gender equation matter |
title_fullStr | Why both sides of the gender equation matter |
title_full_unstemmed | Why both sides of the gender equation matter |
title_short | Why both sides of the gender equation matter |
title_sort | why both sides of the gender equation matter |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35377312 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78890 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barrettlindye whybothsidesofthegenderequationmatter |