Cargando…

Why both sides of the gender equation matter

Despite efforts to increase gender diversity in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and medicine (STEMM), men continue to hold most tenured and leadership positions. Moreover, the specific population shifts and timelines which may be required to achieve gender parity have not been well del...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Barrett, Lindy E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35377312
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78890
_version_ 1784681206204334080
author Barrett, Lindy E
author_facet Barrett, Lindy E
author_sort Barrett, Lindy E
collection PubMed
description Despite efforts to increase gender diversity in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and medicine (STEMM), men continue to hold most tenured and leadership positions. Moreover, the specific population shifts and timelines which may be required to achieve gender parity have not been well delineated. It is obvious that if women are statistically underrepresented in a field, then men must be statistically overrepresented: however, male overrepresentation and related gender-based advantages are rarely mentioned in conversations about gender equality. It is important that actions to address both overrepresentation and underrepresentation are elements of any strategy that seeks to move STEMM fields closer to gender parity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8979584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89795842022-04-05 Why both sides of the gender equation matter Barrett, Lindy E eLife Medicine Despite efforts to increase gender diversity in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and medicine (STEMM), men continue to hold most tenured and leadership positions. Moreover, the specific population shifts and timelines which may be required to achieve gender parity have not been well delineated. It is obvious that if women are statistically underrepresented in a field, then men must be statistically overrepresented: however, male overrepresentation and related gender-based advantages are rarely mentioned in conversations about gender equality. It is important that actions to address both overrepresentation and underrepresentation are elements of any strategy that seeks to move STEMM fields closer to gender parity. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8979584/ /pubmed/35377312 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78890 Text en © 2022, Barrett https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medicine
Barrett, Lindy E
Why both sides of the gender equation matter
title Why both sides of the gender equation matter
title_full Why both sides of the gender equation matter
title_fullStr Why both sides of the gender equation matter
title_full_unstemmed Why both sides of the gender equation matter
title_short Why both sides of the gender equation matter
title_sort why both sides of the gender equation matter
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35377312
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78890
work_keys_str_mv AT barrettlindye whybothsidesofthegenderequationmatter