Cargando…

New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach

Quality cost framework (QCF), as a measurement tool and research method, has played a significant role on quality improvement procedure (QIP) and recognition on economics of quality. The four general QCFs are usually conceptually employed assist quality managers to measure the quality cost (QC/COQ)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Qiong, Xuan, Jing, Zhou, Fuli, Mei, Yuanfei, Su, Jiafu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6416989
_version_ 1784681234896519168
author Wu, Qiong
Xuan, Jing
Zhou, Fuli
Mei, Yuanfei
Su, Jiafu
author_facet Wu, Qiong
Xuan, Jing
Zhou, Fuli
Mei, Yuanfei
Su, Jiafu
author_sort Wu, Qiong
collection PubMed
description Quality cost framework (QCF), as a measurement tool and research method, has played a significant role on quality improvement procedure (QIP) and recognition on economics of quality. The four general QCFs are usually conceptually employed assist quality managers to measure the quality cost (QC/COQ) including PAF, intangible loss, process cost, and ABC framework. The question of how to select an appropriate quality cost framework for individual organization is of great significance for implementing quality improvement activities. Considering the effectiveness and feasibility of the alternative solution, a novel hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach integrating fuzzy DMEATEL, an antientropy weighting technique and FVIKOR method are employed to study the quality cost models and assist managers to select a best QCF for an auto factory. The combined weight from subjectivity and objectivity is embedded into fuzzy VIKOR procedure to obtain alternatives' ranking order. The case study in a Chinese automaker enterprise shows high robustness of the hybrid MCDM approach, and it assists quality mangers to perform quality cost practice. Different from the previous study, the preferred solution is the ABC quality cost framework when feasibility dimension dominates, while the intangible loss framework shows first priority when the organization focuses on effectiveness principle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8979713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89797132022-04-05 New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach Wu, Qiong Xuan, Jing Zhou, Fuli Mei, Yuanfei Su, Jiafu Comput Intell Neurosci Research Article Quality cost framework (QCF), as a measurement tool and research method, has played a significant role on quality improvement procedure (QIP) and recognition on economics of quality. The four general QCFs are usually conceptually employed assist quality managers to measure the quality cost (QC/COQ) including PAF, intangible loss, process cost, and ABC framework. The question of how to select an appropriate quality cost framework for individual organization is of great significance for implementing quality improvement activities. Considering the effectiveness and feasibility of the alternative solution, a novel hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach integrating fuzzy DMEATEL, an antientropy weighting technique and FVIKOR method are employed to study the quality cost models and assist managers to select a best QCF for an auto factory. The combined weight from subjectivity and objectivity is embedded into fuzzy VIKOR procedure to obtain alternatives' ranking order. The case study in a Chinese automaker enterprise shows high robustness of the hybrid MCDM approach, and it assists quality mangers to perform quality cost practice. Different from the previous study, the preferred solution is the ABC quality cost framework when feasibility dimension dominates, while the intangible loss framework shows first priority when the organization focuses on effectiveness principle. Hindawi 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8979713/ /pubmed/35387247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6416989 Text en Copyright © 2022 Qiong Wu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Qiong
Xuan, Jing
Zhou, Fuli
Mei, Yuanfei
Su, Jiafu
New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach
title New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach
title_full New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach
title_fullStr New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach
title_full_unstemmed New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach
title_short New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach
title_sort new quality cost framework (qcf) based on the hybrid fuzzy mcdm approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6416989
work_keys_str_mv AT wuqiong newqualitycostframeworkqcfbasedonthehybridfuzzymcdmapproach
AT xuanjing newqualitycostframeworkqcfbasedonthehybridfuzzymcdmapproach
AT zhoufuli newqualitycostframeworkqcfbasedonthehybridfuzzymcdmapproach
AT meiyuanfei newqualitycostframeworkqcfbasedonthehybridfuzzymcdmapproach
AT sujiafu newqualitycostframeworkqcfbasedonthehybridfuzzymcdmapproach