Cargando…
New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach
Quality cost framework (QCF), as a measurement tool and research method, has played a significant role on quality improvement procedure (QIP) and recognition on economics of quality. The four general QCFs are usually conceptually employed assist quality managers to measure the quality cost (QC/COQ)...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6416989 |
_version_ | 1784681234896519168 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Qiong Xuan, Jing Zhou, Fuli Mei, Yuanfei Su, Jiafu |
author_facet | Wu, Qiong Xuan, Jing Zhou, Fuli Mei, Yuanfei Su, Jiafu |
author_sort | Wu, Qiong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quality cost framework (QCF), as a measurement tool and research method, has played a significant role on quality improvement procedure (QIP) and recognition on economics of quality. The four general QCFs are usually conceptually employed assist quality managers to measure the quality cost (QC/COQ) including PAF, intangible loss, process cost, and ABC framework. The question of how to select an appropriate quality cost framework for individual organization is of great significance for implementing quality improvement activities. Considering the effectiveness and feasibility of the alternative solution, a novel hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach integrating fuzzy DMEATEL, an antientropy weighting technique and FVIKOR method are employed to study the quality cost models and assist managers to select a best QCF for an auto factory. The combined weight from subjectivity and objectivity is embedded into fuzzy VIKOR procedure to obtain alternatives' ranking order. The case study in a Chinese automaker enterprise shows high robustness of the hybrid MCDM approach, and it assists quality mangers to perform quality cost practice. Different from the previous study, the preferred solution is the ABC quality cost framework when feasibility dimension dominates, while the intangible loss framework shows first priority when the organization focuses on effectiveness principle. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8979713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89797132022-04-05 New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach Wu, Qiong Xuan, Jing Zhou, Fuli Mei, Yuanfei Su, Jiafu Comput Intell Neurosci Research Article Quality cost framework (QCF), as a measurement tool and research method, has played a significant role on quality improvement procedure (QIP) and recognition on economics of quality. The four general QCFs are usually conceptually employed assist quality managers to measure the quality cost (QC/COQ) including PAF, intangible loss, process cost, and ABC framework. The question of how to select an appropriate quality cost framework for individual organization is of great significance for implementing quality improvement activities. Considering the effectiveness and feasibility of the alternative solution, a novel hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach integrating fuzzy DMEATEL, an antientropy weighting technique and FVIKOR method are employed to study the quality cost models and assist managers to select a best QCF for an auto factory. The combined weight from subjectivity and objectivity is embedded into fuzzy VIKOR procedure to obtain alternatives' ranking order. The case study in a Chinese automaker enterprise shows high robustness of the hybrid MCDM approach, and it assists quality mangers to perform quality cost practice. Different from the previous study, the preferred solution is the ABC quality cost framework when feasibility dimension dominates, while the intangible loss framework shows first priority when the organization focuses on effectiveness principle. Hindawi 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8979713/ /pubmed/35387247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6416989 Text en Copyright © 2022 Qiong Wu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wu, Qiong Xuan, Jing Zhou, Fuli Mei, Yuanfei Su, Jiafu New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach |
title | New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach |
title_full | New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach |
title_fullStr | New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach |
title_short | New Quality Cost Framework (QCF) Based on the Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach |
title_sort | new quality cost framework (qcf) based on the hybrid fuzzy mcdm approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6416989 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuqiong newqualitycostframeworkqcfbasedonthehybridfuzzymcdmapproach AT xuanjing newqualitycostframeworkqcfbasedonthehybridfuzzymcdmapproach AT zhoufuli newqualitycostframeworkqcfbasedonthehybridfuzzymcdmapproach AT meiyuanfei newqualitycostframeworkqcfbasedonthehybridfuzzymcdmapproach AT sujiafu newqualitycostframeworkqcfbasedonthehybridfuzzymcdmapproach |