Cargando…

The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study

BACKGROUND: The national health care response to coronavirus (COVID-19) has varied between countries. The United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) have comparable maternity and neonatal care systems, and experienced similar numbers of COVID-19 infections, but had different organisational respons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Berg, Lauri M.M., Balaam, Marie-Clare, Nowland, Rebecca, Moncrieff, Gill, Topalidou, Anastasia, Thompson, Suzanne, Thomson, Gill, de Jonge, Ank, Downe, Soo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian College of Midwives. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.010
_version_ 1784681254104334336
author van den Berg, Lauri M.M.
Balaam, Marie-Clare
Nowland, Rebecca
Moncrieff, Gill
Topalidou, Anastasia
Thompson, Suzanne
Thomson, Gill
de Jonge, Ank
Downe, Soo
author_facet van den Berg, Lauri M.M.
Balaam, Marie-Clare
Nowland, Rebecca
Moncrieff, Gill
Topalidou, Anastasia
Thompson, Suzanne
Thomson, Gill
de Jonge, Ank
Downe, Soo
author_sort van den Berg, Lauri M.M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The national health care response to coronavirus (COVID-19) has varied between countries. The United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) have comparable maternity and neonatal care systems, and experienced similar numbers of COVID-19 infections, but had different organisational responses to the pandemic. Understanding why and how similarities and differences occurred in these two contexts could inform optimal care in normal circumstances, and during future crises. AIM: To compare the UK and Dutch COVID-19 maternity and neonatal care responses in three key domains: choice of birthplace, companionship, and families in vulnerable situations. METHOD: A multi-method study, including documentary analysis of national organisation policy and guidance on COVID-19, and interviews with national and regional stakeholders. FINDINGS: Both countries had an infection control focus, with less emphasis on the impact of restrictions, especially for families in vulnerable situations. Differences included care providers’ fear of contracting COVID-19; the extent to which community- and personalised care was embedded in the care system before the pandemic; and how far multidisciplinary collaboration and service-user involvement were prioritised. CONCLUSION: We recommend that countries should 1) make a systematic plan for crisis decision-making before a serious event occurs, and that this must include authentic service-user involvement, multidisciplinary collaboration, and protection of staff wellbeing 2) integrate women’s and families’ values into the maternity and neonatal care system, ensuring equitable inclusion of the most vulnerable and 3) strengthen community provision to ensure system wide resilience to future shocks from pandemics, or other unexpected large-scale events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8979792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian College of Midwives.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89797922022-04-05 The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study van den Berg, Lauri M.M. Balaam, Marie-Clare Nowland, Rebecca Moncrieff, Gill Topalidou, Anastasia Thompson, Suzanne Thomson, Gill de Jonge, Ank Downe, Soo Women Birth Article BACKGROUND: The national health care response to coronavirus (COVID-19) has varied between countries. The United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) have comparable maternity and neonatal care systems, and experienced similar numbers of COVID-19 infections, but had different organisational responses to the pandemic. Understanding why and how similarities and differences occurred in these two contexts could inform optimal care in normal circumstances, and during future crises. AIM: To compare the UK and Dutch COVID-19 maternity and neonatal care responses in three key domains: choice of birthplace, companionship, and families in vulnerable situations. METHOD: A multi-method study, including documentary analysis of national organisation policy and guidance on COVID-19, and interviews with national and regional stakeholders. FINDINGS: Both countries had an infection control focus, with less emphasis on the impact of restrictions, especially for families in vulnerable situations. Differences included care providers’ fear of contracting COVID-19; the extent to which community- and personalised care was embedded in the care system before the pandemic; and how far multidisciplinary collaboration and service-user involvement were prioritised. CONCLUSION: We recommend that countries should 1) make a systematic plan for crisis decision-making before a serious event occurs, and that this must include authentic service-user involvement, multidisciplinary collaboration, and protection of staff wellbeing 2) integrate women’s and families’ values into the maternity and neonatal care system, ensuring equitable inclusion of the most vulnerable and 3) strengthen community provision to ensure system wide resilience to future shocks from pandemics, or other unexpected large-scale events. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian College of Midwives. 2023-02 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8979792/ /pubmed/35422406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.010 Text en © 2023 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
van den Berg, Lauri M.M.
Balaam, Marie-Clare
Nowland, Rebecca
Moncrieff, Gill
Topalidou, Anastasia
Thompson, Suzanne
Thomson, Gill
de Jonge, Ank
Downe, Soo
The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study
title The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study
title_full The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study
title_fullStr The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study
title_short The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study
title_sort united kingdom and the netherlands maternity care responses to covid-19: a comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.010
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenberglaurimm theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT balaammarieclare theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT nowlandrebecca theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT moncrieffgill theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT topalidouanastasia theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT thompsonsuzanne theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT thomsongill theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT dejongeank theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT downesoo theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT vandenberglaurimm unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT balaammarieclare unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT nowlandrebecca unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT moncrieffgill unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT topalidouanastasia unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT thompsonsuzanne unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT thomsongill unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT dejongeank unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT downesoo unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy
AT unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy