Cargando…
The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study
BACKGROUND: The national health care response to coronavirus (COVID-19) has varied between countries. The United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) have comparable maternity and neonatal care systems, and experienced similar numbers of COVID-19 infections, but had different organisational respons...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian College of Midwives.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.010 |
_version_ | 1784681254104334336 |
---|---|
author | van den Berg, Lauri M.M. Balaam, Marie-Clare Nowland, Rebecca Moncrieff, Gill Topalidou, Anastasia Thompson, Suzanne Thomson, Gill de Jonge, Ank Downe, Soo |
author_facet | van den Berg, Lauri M.M. Balaam, Marie-Clare Nowland, Rebecca Moncrieff, Gill Topalidou, Anastasia Thompson, Suzanne Thomson, Gill de Jonge, Ank Downe, Soo |
author_sort | van den Berg, Lauri M.M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The national health care response to coronavirus (COVID-19) has varied between countries. The United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) have comparable maternity and neonatal care systems, and experienced similar numbers of COVID-19 infections, but had different organisational responses to the pandemic. Understanding why and how similarities and differences occurred in these two contexts could inform optimal care in normal circumstances, and during future crises. AIM: To compare the UK and Dutch COVID-19 maternity and neonatal care responses in three key domains: choice of birthplace, companionship, and families in vulnerable situations. METHOD: A multi-method study, including documentary analysis of national organisation policy and guidance on COVID-19, and interviews with national and regional stakeholders. FINDINGS: Both countries had an infection control focus, with less emphasis on the impact of restrictions, especially for families in vulnerable situations. Differences included care providers’ fear of contracting COVID-19; the extent to which community- and personalised care was embedded in the care system before the pandemic; and how far multidisciplinary collaboration and service-user involvement were prioritised. CONCLUSION: We recommend that countries should 1) make a systematic plan for crisis decision-making before a serious event occurs, and that this must include authentic service-user involvement, multidisciplinary collaboration, and protection of staff wellbeing 2) integrate women’s and families’ values into the maternity and neonatal care system, ensuring equitable inclusion of the most vulnerable and 3) strengthen community provision to ensure system wide resilience to future shocks from pandemics, or other unexpected large-scale events. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8979792 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian College of Midwives. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89797922022-04-05 The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study van den Berg, Lauri M.M. Balaam, Marie-Clare Nowland, Rebecca Moncrieff, Gill Topalidou, Anastasia Thompson, Suzanne Thomson, Gill de Jonge, Ank Downe, Soo Women Birth Article BACKGROUND: The national health care response to coronavirus (COVID-19) has varied between countries. The United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) have comparable maternity and neonatal care systems, and experienced similar numbers of COVID-19 infections, but had different organisational responses to the pandemic. Understanding why and how similarities and differences occurred in these two contexts could inform optimal care in normal circumstances, and during future crises. AIM: To compare the UK and Dutch COVID-19 maternity and neonatal care responses in three key domains: choice of birthplace, companionship, and families in vulnerable situations. METHOD: A multi-method study, including documentary analysis of national organisation policy and guidance on COVID-19, and interviews with national and regional stakeholders. FINDINGS: Both countries had an infection control focus, with less emphasis on the impact of restrictions, especially for families in vulnerable situations. Differences included care providers’ fear of contracting COVID-19; the extent to which community- and personalised care was embedded in the care system before the pandemic; and how far multidisciplinary collaboration and service-user involvement were prioritised. CONCLUSION: We recommend that countries should 1) make a systematic plan for crisis decision-making before a serious event occurs, and that this must include authentic service-user involvement, multidisciplinary collaboration, and protection of staff wellbeing 2) integrate women’s and families’ values into the maternity and neonatal care system, ensuring equitable inclusion of the most vulnerable and 3) strengthen community provision to ensure system wide resilience to future shocks from pandemics, or other unexpected large-scale events. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian College of Midwives. 2023-02 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8979792/ /pubmed/35422406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.010 Text en © 2023 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article van den Berg, Lauri M.M. Balaam, Marie-Clare Nowland, Rebecca Moncrieff, Gill Topalidou, Anastasia Thompson, Suzanne Thomson, Gill de Jonge, Ank Downe, Soo The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study |
title | The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study |
title_full | The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study |
title_fullStr | The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study |
title_short | The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study |
title_sort | united kingdom and the netherlands maternity care responses to covid-19: a comparative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenberglaurimm theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT balaammarieclare theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT nowlandrebecca theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT moncrieffgill theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT topalidouanastasia theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT thompsonsuzanne theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT thomsongill theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT dejongeank theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT downesoo theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT theunitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT vandenberglaurimm unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT balaammarieclare unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT nowlandrebecca unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT moncrieffgill unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT topalidouanastasia unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT thompsonsuzanne unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT thomsongill unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT dejongeank unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT downesoo unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy AT unitedkingdomandthenetherlandsmaternitycareresponsestocovid19acomparativestudy |