Cargando…

Artificial intelligence for older people receiving long-term care: a systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness studies

Artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced interventions show promise for improving the delivery of long-term care (LTC) services for older people. However, the research field is developmental and has yet to be systematically synthesised. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the literature on the a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loveys, Kate, Prina, Matthew, Axford, Chloe, Domènec, Òscar Ristol, Weng, William, Broadbent, Elizabeth, Pujari, Sameer, Jang, Hyobum, Han, Zee A, Thiyagarajan, Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00034-4
_version_ 1784681262680637440
author Loveys, Kate
Prina, Matthew
Axford, Chloe
Domènec, Òscar Ristol
Weng, William
Broadbent, Elizabeth
Pujari, Sameer
Jang, Hyobum
Han, Zee A
Thiyagarajan, Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli
author_facet Loveys, Kate
Prina, Matthew
Axford, Chloe
Domènec, Òscar Ristol
Weng, William
Broadbent, Elizabeth
Pujari, Sameer
Jang, Hyobum
Han, Zee A
Thiyagarajan, Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli
author_sort Loveys, Kate
collection PubMed
description Artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced interventions show promise for improving the delivery of long-term care (LTC) services for older people. However, the research field is developmental and has yet to be systematically synthesised. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the literature on the acceptability and effectiveness of AI-enhanced interventions for older people receiving LTC services. We conducted a systematic search that identified 2720 records from Embase, Ovid, Global Health, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. 31 articles were included in the review that evaluated AI-enhanced social robots (n=22), environmental sensors (n=6), and wearable sensors (n=5) with older people receiving LTC services across 15 controlled and 14 non-controlled trials in high-income countries. Risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB 2, RoB 2 CRT, and ROBINS-I tools. Overall, AI-enhanced interventions were found to be somewhat acceptable to users with mixed evidence for their effectiveness across different health outcomes. The included studies were found to have high risk of bias which reduced confidence in the results. AI-enhanced interventions are promising innovations that could reshape the landscape of LTC globally. However, more trials are required to support their widespread implementation. Pathways are needed to support more high-quality trials, including in low-income and middle-income countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8979827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89798272022-05-03 Artificial intelligence for older people receiving long-term care: a systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness studies Loveys, Kate Prina, Matthew Axford, Chloe Domènec, Òscar Ristol Weng, William Broadbent, Elizabeth Pujari, Sameer Jang, Hyobum Han, Zee A Thiyagarajan, Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Lancet Healthy Longev Review Artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced interventions show promise for improving the delivery of long-term care (LTC) services for older people. However, the research field is developmental and has yet to be systematically synthesised. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the literature on the acceptability and effectiveness of AI-enhanced interventions for older people receiving LTC services. We conducted a systematic search that identified 2720 records from Embase, Ovid, Global Health, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. 31 articles were included in the review that evaluated AI-enhanced social robots (n=22), environmental sensors (n=6), and wearable sensors (n=5) with older people receiving LTC services across 15 controlled and 14 non-controlled trials in high-income countries. Risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB 2, RoB 2 CRT, and ROBINS-I tools. Overall, AI-enhanced interventions were found to be somewhat acceptable to users with mixed evidence for their effectiveness across different health outcomes. The included studies were found to have high risk of bias which reduced confidence in the results. AI-enhanced interventions are promising innovations that could reshape the landscape of LTC globally. However, more trials are required to support their widespread implementation. Pathways are needed to support more high-quality trials, including in low-income and middle-income countries. Elsevier Ltd 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8979827/ /pubmed/35515814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00034-4 Text en © 2022 World Health Organization https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Loveys, Kate
Prina, Matthew
Axford, Chloe
Domènec, Òscar Ristol
Weng, William
Broadbent, Elizabeth
Pujari, Sameer
Jang, Hyobum
Han, Zee A
Thiyagarajan, Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli
Artificial intelligence for older people receiving long-term care: a systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness studies
title Artificial intelligence for older people receiving long-term care: a systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness studies
title_full Artificial intelligence for older people receiving long-term care: a systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness studies
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence for older people receiving long-term care: a systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness studies
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence for older people receiving long-term care: a systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness studies
title_short Artificial intelligence for older people receiving long-term care: a systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness studies
title_sort artificial intelligence for older people receiving long-term care: a systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00034-4
work_keys_str_mv AT loveyskate artificialintelligenceforolderpeoplereceivinglongtermcareasystematicreviewofacceptabilityandeffectivenessstudies
AT prinamatthew artificialintelligenceforolderpeoplereceivinglongtermcareasystematicreviewofacceptabilityandeffectivenessstudies
AT axfordchloe artificialintelligenceforolderpeoplereceivinglongtermcareasystematicreviewofacceptabilityandeffectivenessstudies
AT domenecoscarristol artificialintelligenceforolderpeoplereceivinglongtermcareasystematicreviewofacceptabilityandeffectivenessstudies
AT wengwilliam artificialintelligenceforolderpeoplereceivinglongtermcareasystematicreviewofacceptabilityandeffectivenessstudies
AT broadbentelizabeth artificialintelligenceforolderpeoplereceivinglongtermcareasystematicreviewofacceptabilityandeffectivenessstudies
AT pujarisameer artificialintelligenceforolderpeoplereceivinglongtermcareasystematicreviewofacceptabilityandeffectivenessstudies
AT janghyobum artificialintelligenceforolderpeoplereceivinglongtermcareasystematicreviewofacceptabilityandeffectivenessstudies
AT hanzeea artificialintelligenceforolderpeoplereceivinglongtermcareasystematicreviewofacceptabilityandeffectivenessstudies
AT thiyagarajanjotheeswaranamuthavalli artificialintelligenceforolderpeoplereceivinglongtermcareasystematicreviewofacceptabilityandeffectivenessstudies