Cargando…
Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy
PURPOSE: We designed a modified technique to perform an advanced procedure using conventional instruments and did not employ specialized single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) port equipment. We compared postoperative results for transumbilical, single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA) an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgeons
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601706 http://dx.doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2019.22.1.11 |
_version_ | 1784681267146522624 |
---|---|
author | Chung, Han Sol Jung, Sung Min Lee, Mee-ri Shin, Yong Chan Jun, Heung Man Kim, Jae Il Choi, Pyung Wha |
author_facet | Chung, Han Sol Jung, Sung Min Lee, Mee-ri Shin, Yong Chan Jun, Heung Man Kim, Jae Il Choi, Pyung Wha |
author_sort | Chung, Han Sol |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We designed a modified technique to perform an advanced procedure using conventional instruments and did not employ specialized single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) port equipment. We compared postoperative results for transumbilical, single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA) and single-incision, 2-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SITPLA). METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 77 patients who underwent TUSPLA or SITPLA to provide more minimally invasive surgery between May 2017 and April 2018. TUSPLA was performed in 39 patients and 38 underwent SITPLA. In the SITPLA group, two 5-mm trocars were inserted through the umbilicus and an extra puncture site was used for a left-handed instrument. Demographic characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were collected and compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean total operative time in the SITPLA group was shorter than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.003). The mean laparoscopic instrumental time was also shorter (p<0.001) in the SITPLA. The number of postoperative analgesics in the SITPLA group was less than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.002). The length of hospital day after surgery was shorter in the SITPLA group than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.008). There were no other significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: SITPLA had a shorter operative time, required less pain management, and had a similar cosmetic outcome when compared with TUSPLA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8979846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89798462022-05-19 Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Chung, Han Sol Jung, Sung Min Lee, Mee-ri Shin, Yong Chan Jun, Heung Man Kim, Jae Il Choi, Pyung Wha J Minim Invasive Surg Original Article PURPOSE: We designed a modified technique to perform an advanced procedure using conventional instruments and did not employ specialized single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) port equipment. We compared postoperative results for transumbilical, single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA) and single-incision, 2-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SITPLA). METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 77 patients who underwent TUSPLA or SITPLA to provide more minimally invasive surgery between May 2017 and April 2018. TUSPLA was performed in 39 patients and 38 underwent SITPLA. In the SITPLA group, two 5-mm trocars were inserted through the umbilicus and an extra puncture site was used for a left-handed instrument. Demographic characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were collected and compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean total operative time in the SITPLA group was shorter than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.003). The mean laparoscopic instrumental time was also shorter (p<0.001) in the SITPLA. The number of postoperative analgesics in the SITPLA group was less than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.002). The length of hospital day after surgery was shorter in the SITPLA group than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.008). There were no other significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: SITPLA had a shorter operative time, required less pain management, and had a similar cosmetic outcome when compared with TUSPLA. The Korean Society of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgeons 2019-03 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8979846/ /pubmed/35601706 http://dx.doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2019.22.1.11 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chung, Han Sol Jung, Sung Min Lee, Mee-ri Shin, Yong Chan Jun, Heung Man Kim, Jae Il Choi, Pyung Wha Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy |
title | Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy |
title_full | Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy |
title_fullStr | Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy |
title_short | Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy |
title_sort | single-incision, two-port laparoscopic appendectomy as an alternative to transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601706 http://dx.doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2019.22.1.11 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chunghansol singleincisiontwoportlaparoscopicappendectomyasanalternativetotransumbilicalsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomy AT jungsungmin singleincisiontwoportlaparoscopicappendectomyasanalternativetotransumbilicalsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomy AT leemeeri singleincisiontwoportlaparoscopicappendectomyasanalternativetotransumbilicalsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomy AT shinyongchan singleincisiontwoportlaparoscopicappendectomyasanalternativetotransumbilicalsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomy AT junheungman singleincisiontwoportlaparoscopicappendectomyasanalternativetotransumbilicalsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomy AT kimjaeil singleincisiontwoportlaparoscopicappendectomyasanalternativetotransumbilicalsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomy AT choipyungwha singleincisiontwoportlaparoscopicappendectomyasanalternativetotransumbilicalsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomy |