Cargando…

Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy

PURPOSE: We designed a modified technique to perform an advanced procedure using conventional instruments and did not employ specialized single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) port equipment. We compared postoperative results for transumbilical, single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA) an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Han Sol, Jung, Sung Min, Lee, Mee-ri, Shin, Yong Chan, Jun, Heung Man, Kim, Jae Il, Choi, Pyung Wha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgeons 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601706
http://dx.doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2019.22.1.11
_version_ 1784681267146522624
author Chung, Han Sol
Jung, Sung Min
Lee, Mee-ri
Shin, Yong Chan
Jun, Heung Man
Kim, Jae Il
Choi, Pyung Wha
author_facet Chung, Han Sol
Jung, Sung Min
Lee, Mee-ri
Shin, Yong Chan
Jun, Heung Man
Kim, Jae Il
Choi, Pyung Wha
author_sort Chung, Han Sol
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We designed a modified technique to perform an advanced procedure using conventional instruments and did not employ specialized single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) port equipment. We compared postoperative results for transumbilical, single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA) and single-incision, 2-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SITPLA). METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 77 patients who underwent TUSPLA or SITPLA to provide more minimally invasive surgery between May 2017 and April 2018. TUSPLA was performed in 39 patients and 38 underwent SITPLA. In the SITPLA group, two 5-mm trocars were inserted through the umbilicus and an extra puncture site was used for a left-handed instrument. Demographic characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were collected and compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean total operative time in the SITPLA group was shorter than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.003). The mean laparoscopic instrumental time was also shorter (p<0.001) in the SITPLA. The number of postoperative analgesics in the SITPLA group was less than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.002). The length of hospital day after surgery was shorter in the SITPLA group than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.008). There were no other significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: SITPLA had a shorter operative time, required less pain management, and had a similar cosmetic outcome when compared with TUSPLA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8979846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Society of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89798462022-05-19 Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Chung, Han Sol Jung, Sung Min Lee, Mee-ri Shin, Yong Chan Jun, Heung Man Kim, Jae Il Choi, Pyung Wha J Minim Invasive Surg Original Article PURPOSE: We designed a modified technique to perform an advanced procedure using conventional instruments and did not employ specialized single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) port equipment. We compared postoperative results for transumbilical, single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA) and single-incision, 2-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SITPLA). METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 77 patients who underwent TUSPLA or SITPLA to provide more minimally invasive surgery between May 2017 and April 2018. TUSPLA was performed in 39 patients and 38 underwent SITPLA. In the SITPLA group, two 5-mm trocars were inserted through the umbilicus and an extra puncture site was used for a left-handed instrument. Demographic characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were collected and compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean total operative time in the SITPLA group was shorter than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.003). The mean laparoscopic instrumental time was also shorter (p<0.001) in the SITPLA. The number of postoperative analgesics in the SITPLA group was less than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.002). The length of hospital day after surgery was shorter in the SITPLA group than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.008). There were no other significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: SITPLA had a shorter operative time, required less pain management, and had a similar cosmetic outcome when compared with TUSPLA. The Korean Society of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgeons 2019-03 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8979846/ /pubmed/35601706 http://dx.doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2019.22.1.11 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chung, Han Sol
Jung, Sung Min
Lee, Mee-ri
Shin, Yong Chan
Jun, Heung Man
Kim, Jae Il
Choi, Pyung Wha
Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy
title Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy
title_full Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy
title_fullStr Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy
title_full_unstemmed Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy
title_short Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy
title_sort single-incision, two-port laparoscopic appendectomy as an alternative to transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601706
http://dx.doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2019.22.1.11
work_keys_str_mv AT chunghansol singleincisiontwoportlaparoscopicappendectomyasanalternativetotransumbilicalsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomy
AT jungsungmin singleincisiontwoportlaparoscopicappendectomyasanalternativetotransumbilicalsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomy
AT leemeeri singleincisiontwoportlaparoscopicappendectomyasanalternativetotransumbilicalsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomy
AT shinyongchan singleincisiontwoportlaparoscopicappendectomyasanalternativetotransumbilicalsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomy
AT junheungman singleincisiontwoportlaparoscopicappendectomyasanalternativetotransumbilicalsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomy
AT kimjaeil singleincisiontwoportlaparoscopicappendectomyasanalternativetotransumbilicalsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomy
AT choipyungwha singleincisiontwoportlaparoscopicappendectomyasanalternativetotransumbilicalsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomy