Cargando…
Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants for single-tooth restorations in the maxillary esthetic zone: a 5-year prospective single-cohort multicenter analysis
OBJECTIVES: This open, single-cohort, multicenter, prospective study investigated the efficacy of immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implant for single-tooth restorations in the anterior and premolar regions of the maxilla after 5 years of function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All imp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34997359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04328-2 |
_version_ | 1784681276657106944 |
---|---|
author | Baer, Russell A. Nölken, Robert Colic, Snjezana Heydecke, Guido Mirzakhanian, Christine Behneke, Alexandra Behneke, Nikolaus Gottesman, Edward Ottria, Liliana Pozzi, Alessandro Fügl, Alexander Zechner, Werner |
author_facet | Baer, Russell A. Nölken, Robert Colic, Snjezana Heydecke, Guido Mirzakhanian, Christine Behneke, Alexandra Behneke, Nikolaus Gottesman, Edward Ottria, Liliana Pozzi, Alessandro Fügl, Alexander Zechner, Werner |
author_sort | Baer, Russell A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This open, single-cohort, multicenter, prospective study investigated the efficacy of immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implant for single-tooth restorations in the anterior and premolar regions of the maxilla after 5 years of function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All implants were placed in healed sites and immediately provisionalized. MBLs, soft-tissue parameters, and oral-health impact profile (OHIP) were evaluated at implant insertion, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used for statistical and implant survival/success analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients (81 implants) completed the 5-year follow-up. The 5-year cumulative survival and success rates were 97.8%, and the mean MBL change from implant insertion to 5 years was − 0.80 ± 1.13 mm. Optimal papilla index scores were observed at 90.1% of sites at 5 years compared with 32.8% of sites at insertion. Pink esthetic score, modified bleeding and plaque indices, and OHIP showed statistically significant improvement at the 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants promote marginal bone stability and excellent esthetic outcomes after 5 years of function. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This treatment is a viable option for patients requiring immediately provisionalized single-tooth restorations in the esthetic zone and shows favorable long-term clinical outcomes, including marginal bone stability and excellent esthetics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8979890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89798902022-04-22 Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants for single-tooth restorations in the maxillary esthetic zone: a 5-year prospective single-cohort multicenter analysis Baer, Russell A. Nölken, Robert Colic, Snjezana Heydecke, Guido Mirzakhanian, Christine Behneke, Alexandra Behneke, Nikolaus Gottesman, Edward Ottria, Liliana Pozzi, Alessandro Fügl, Alexander Zechner, Werner Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: This open, single-cohort, multicenter, prospective study investigated the efficacy of immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implant for single-tooth restorations in the anterior and premolar regions of the maxilla after 5 years of function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All implants were placed in healed sites and immediately provisionalized. MBLs, soft-tissue parameters, and oral-health impact profile (OHIP) were evaluated at implant insertion, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used for statistical and implant survival/success analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients (81 implants) completed the 5-year follow-up. The 5-year cumulative survival and success rates were 97.8%, and the mean MBL change from implant insertion to 5 years was − 0.80 ± 1.13 mm. Optimal papilla index scores were observed at 90.1% of sites at 5 years compared with 32.8% of sites at insertion. Pink esthetic score, modified bleeding and plaque indices, and OHIP showed statistically significant improvement at the 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants promote marginal bone stability and excellent esthetic outcomes after 5 years of function. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This treatment is a viable option for patients requiring immediately provisionalized single-tooth restorations in the esthetic zone and shows favorable long-term clinical outcomes, including marginal bone stability and excellent esthetics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8979890/ /pubmed/34997359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04328-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Baer, Russell A. Nölken, Robert Colic, Snjezana Heydecke, Guido Mirzakhanian, Christine Behneke, Alexandra Behneke, Nikolaus Gottesman, Edward Ottria, Liliana Pozzi, Alessandro Fügl, Alexander Zechner, Werner Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants for single-tooth restorations in the maxillary esthetic zone: a 5-year prospective single-cohort multicenter analysis |
title | Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants for single-tooth restorations in the maxillary esthetic zone: a 5-year prospective single-cohort multicenter analysis |
title_full | Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants for single-tooth restorations in the maxillary esthetic zone: a 5-year prospective single-cohort multicenter analysis |
title_fullStr | Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants for single-tooth restorations in the maxillary esthetic zone: a 5-year prospective single-cohort multicenter analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants for single-tooth restorations in the maxillary esthetic zone: a 5-year prospective single-cohort multicenter analysis |
title_short | Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants for single-tooth restorations in the maxillary esthetic zone: a 5-year prospective single-cohort multicenter analysis |
title_sort | immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants for single-tooth restorations in the maxillary esthetic zone: a 5-year prospective single-cohort multicenter analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34997359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04328-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baerrussella immediatelyprovisionalizedtaperedconicalconnectionimplantsforsingletoothrestorationsinthemaxillaryestheticzonea5yearprospectivesinglecohortmulticenteranalysis AT nolkenrobert immediatelyprovisionalizedtaperedconicalconnectionimplantsforsingletoothrestorationsinthemaxillaryestheticzonea5yearprospectivesinglecohortmulticenteranalysis AT colicsnjezana immediatelyprovisionalizedtaperedconicalconnectionimplantsforsingletoothrestorationsinthemaxillaryestheticzonea5yearprospectivesinglecohortmulticenteranalysis AT heydeckeguido immediatelyprovisionalizedtaperedconicalconnectionimplantsforsingletoothrestorationsinthemaxillaryestheticzonea5yearprospectivesinglecohortmulticenteranalysis AT mirzakhanianchristine immediatelyprovisionalizedtaperedconicalconnectionimplantsforsingletoothrestorationsinthemaxillaryestheticzonea5yearprospectivesinglecohortmulticenteranalysis AT behnekealexandra immediatelyprovisionalizedtaperedconicalconnectionimplantsforsingletoothrestorationsinthemaxillaryestheticzonea5yearprospectivesinglecohortmulticenteranalysis AT behnekenikolaus immediatelyprovisionalizedtaperedconicalconnectionimplantsforsingletoothrestorationsinthemaxillaryestheticzonea5yearprospectivesinglecohortmulticenteranalysis AT gottesmanedward immediatelyprovisionalizedtaperedconicalconnectionimplantsforsingletoothrestorationsinthemaxillaryestheticzonea5yearprospectivesinglecohortmulticenteranalysis AT ottrialiliana immediatelyprovisionalizedtaperedconicalconnectionimplantsforsingletoothrestorationsinthemaxillaryestheticzonea5yearprospectivesinglecohortmulticenteranalysis AT pozzialessandro immediatelyprovisionalizedtaperedconicalconnectionimplantsforsingletoothrestorationsinthemaxillaryestheticzonea5yearprospectivesinglecohortmulticenteranalysis AT fuglalexander immediatelyprovisionalizedtaperedconicalconnectionimplantsforsingletoothrestorationsinthemaxillaryestheticzonea5yearprospectivesinglecohortmulticenteranalysis AT zechnerwerner immediatelyprovisionalizedtaperedconicalconnectionimplantsforsingletoothrestorationsinthemaxillaryestheticzonea5yearprospectivesinglecohortmulticenteranalysis |