Cargando…

Unimpaired groupitizing in children and adolescents with dyscalculia

When asked to estimate the number of items in the visual field, neurotypical adults are more precise and rapid if the items are clustered into subgroups compared to when they are randomly distributed. It has been suggested that this phenomenon, termed “groupitizing”, relies on the recruitment of ari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anobile, Giovanni, Marazzi, Moreno, Federici, Stefano, Napoletti, Agnese, Cecconi, Lucia, Arrighi, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09709-5
_version_ 1784681314816884736
author Anobile, Giovanni
Marazzi, Moreno
Federici, Stefano
Napoletti, Agnese
Cecconi, Lucia
Arrighi, Roberto
author_facet Anobile, Giovanni
Marazzi, Moreno
Federici, Stefano
Napoletti, Agnese
Cecconi, Lucia
Arrighi, Roberto
author_sort Anobile, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description When asked to estimate the number of items in the visual field, neurotypical adults are more precise and rapid if the items are clustered into subgroups compared to when they are randomly distributed. It has been suggested that this phenomenon, termed “groupitizing”, relies on the recruitment of arithmetical calculation strategies and subitizing. Here the role of arithmetical skills in groupitizing was investigated by measuring the groupitizing effect (or advantage) in a sample of children and adolescents with and without math learning disability (dyscalculia). The results showed that when items were grouped, both groups of participants showed a similar advantage on sensory precision and response time in numerosity estimates. Correlational analyses confirmed a lack of covariation between groupitizing advantage and math scores. Bayesian statistics on sensory precision sustained the frequentist analyses providing decisive evidence in favor of no groups difference on groupitizing advantage magnitude (LBF = − 0.44) and no correlation with math scores (LBF = − 0.57). The results on response times, although less decisive, were again in favor of the null hypothesis. Overall, the results suggest that the link between groupitizing and mathematical abilities cannot be taken for granted, calling for further investigations on the factors underlying this perceptual phenomenon.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8980065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89800652022-04-06 Unimpaired groupitizing in children and adolescents with dyscalculia Anobile, Giovanni Marazzi, Moreno Federici, Stefano Napoletti, Agnese Cecconi, Lucia Arrighi, Roberto Sci Rep Article When asked to estimate the number of items in the visual field, neurotypical adults are more precise and rapid if the items are clustered into subgroups compared to when they are randomly distributed. It has been suggested that this phenomenon, termed “groupitizing”, relies on the recruitment of arithmetical calculation strategies and subitizing. Here the role of arithmetical skills in groupitizing was investigated by measuring the groupitizing effect (or advantage) in a sample of children and adolescents with and without math learning disability (dyscalculia). The results showed that when items were grouped, both groups of participants showed a similar advantage on sensory precision and response time in numerosity estimates. Correlational analyses confirmed a lack of covariation between groupitizing advantage and math scores. Bayesian statistics on sensory precision sustained the frequentist analyses providing decisive evidence in favor of no groups difference on groupitizing advantage magnitude (LBF = − 0.44) and no correlation with math scores (LBF = − 0.57). The results on response times, although less decisive, were again in favor of the null hypothesis. Overall, the results suggest that the link between groupitizing and mathematical abilities cannot be taken for granted, calling for further investigations on the factors underlying this perceptual phenomenon. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8980065/ /pubmed/35379895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09709-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Anobile, Giovanni
Marazzi, Moreno
Federici, Stefano
Napoletti, Agnese
Cecconi, Lucia
Arrighi, Roberto
Unimpaired groupitizing in children and adolescents with dyscalculia
title Unimpaired groupitizing in children and adolescents with dyscalculia
title_full Unimpaired groupitizing in children and adolescents with dyscalculia
title_fullStr Unimpaired groupitizing in children and adolescents with dyscalculia
title_full_unstemmed Unimpaired groupitizing in children and adolescents with dyscalculia
title_short Unimpaired groupitizing in children and adolescents with dyscalculia
title_sort unimpaired groupitizing in children and adolescents with dyscalculia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09709-5
work_keys_str_mv AT anobilegiovanni unimpairedgroupitizinginchildrenandadolescentswithdyscalculia
AT marazzimoreno unimpairedgroupitizinginchildrenandadolescentswithdyscalculia
AT federicistefano unimpairedgroupitizinginchildrenandadolescentswithdyscalculia
AT napolettiagnese unimpairedgroupitizinginchildrenandadolescentswithdyscalculia
AT cecconilucia unimpairedgroupitizinginchildrenandadolescentswithdyscalculia
AT arrighiroberto unimpairedgroupitizinginchildrenandadolescentswithdyscalculia