Cargando…
A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial
BACKGROUND: A negative oral contrast agent (OCA) has been long sought for, to better delineate the bowel and visualise surrounding structures. Lumentin® 44 (L44) is a new OCA formulated to fill the entire small bowel. The aim of this study was to compare L44 with positive and neutral conventional OC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35378633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00267-z |
_version_ | 1784681325095026688 |
---|---|
author | Leander, Peter Stathis, Georgios Casal-Dujat, Lucia Boman, Karolina Adnerhill, Ingvar Marsal, Jan Böök, Olof Fork, Thomas |
author_facet | Leander, Peter Stathis, Georgios Casal-Dujat, Lucia Boman, Karolina Adnerhill, Ingvar Marsal, Jan Böök, Olof Fork, Thomas |
author_sort | Leander, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A negative oral contrast agent (OCA) has been long sought for, to better delineate the bowel and visualise surrounding structures. Lumentin® 44 (L44) is a new OCA formulated to fill the entire small bowel. The aim of this study was to compare L44 with positive and neutral conventional OCA in abdominal computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Forty-five oncologic patients were randomised to receive either L44 or one of the two comparators (MoviPrep® or diluted Omnipaque®). Abdominal CT examinations with intravenous contrast agent were acquired according to standard protocols. The studies were read independently by two senior radiologists. RESULTS: The mean intraluminal Hounsfield units (HU)-values of regions-of-interest (ROIs) for each subsegment of small bowel and treatment group were -404.0 HU for L44, 166.1 HU for Omnipaque®, and 16.7 HU for MoviPrep® (L44 versus Omnipaque, p < 0.001: L44 versus MoviPrep p < 0.001; Omnipaque versus MoviPrep, p = 0.003). Adverse events, only mild, using L44 were numerically fewer than for using conventional oral contrast agents. Visualisation of abdominal structures beyond the small bowel was similar to the comparators. CONCLUSIONS: L44 is a negative OCA with luminal radiodensity at approximately -400 HU creating a unique small bowel appearance on CT scans. The high bowel wall-to-lumen contrast may enable improved visualisation in a range of pathologic conditions. L44 showed a good safety profile and was well accepted by patients studied. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT (2017-002368-42) and in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03326518). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41747-022-00267-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8980139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89801392022-04-22 A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial Leander, Peter Stathis, Georgios Casal-Dujat, Lucia Boman, Karolina Adnerhill, Ingvar Marsal, Jan Böök, Olof Fork, Thomas Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: A negative oral contrast agent (OCA) has been long sought for, to better delineate the bowel and visualise surrounding structures. Lumentin® 44 (L44) is a new OCA formulated to fill the entire small bowel. The aim of this study was to compare L44 with positive and neutral conventional OCA in abdominal computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Forty-five oncologic patients were randomised to receive either L44 or one of the two comparators (MoviPrep® or diluted Omnipaque®). Abdominal CT examinations with intravenous contrast agent were acquired according to standard protocols. The studies were read independently by two senior radiologists. RESULTS: The mean intraluminal Hounsfield units (HU)-values of regions-of-interest (ROIs) for each subsegment of small bowel and treatment group were -404.0 HU for L44, 166.1 HU for Omnipaque®, and 16.7 HU for MoviPrep® (L44 versus Omnipaque, p < 0.001: L44 versus MoviPrep p < 0.001; Omnipaque versus MoviPrep, p = 0.003). Adverse events, only mild, using L44 were numerically fewer than for using conventional oral contrast agents. Visualisation of abdominal structures beyond the small bowel was similar to the comparators. CONCLUSIONS: L44 is a negative OCA with luminal radiodensity at approximately -400 HU creating a unique small bowel appearance on CT scans. The high bowel wall-to-lumen contrast may enable improved visualisation in a range of pathologic conditions. L44 showed a good safety profile and was well accepted by patients studied. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT (2017-002368-42) and in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03326518). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41747-022-00267-z. Springer Vienna 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8980139/ /pubmed/35378633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00267-z Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Leander, Peter Stathis, Georgios Casal-Dujat, Lucia Boman, Karolina Adnerhill, Ingvar Marsal, Jan Böök, Olof Fork, Thomas A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial |
title | A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial |
title_full | A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial |
title_fullStr | A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial |
title_short | A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial |
title_sort | novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal ct: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35378633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00267-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leanderpeter anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT stathisgeorgios anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT casaldujatlucia anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT bomankarolina anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT adnerhillingvar anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT marsaljan anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT bookolof anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT forkthomas anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT leanderpeter novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT stathisgeorgios novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT casaldujatlucia novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT bomankarolina novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT adnerhillingvar novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT marsaljan novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT bookolof novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial AT forkthomas novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial |