Cargando…

A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial

BACKGROUND: A negative oral contrast agent (OCA) has been long sought for, to better delineate the bowel and visualise surrounding structures. Lumentin® 44 (L44) is a new OCA formulated to fill the entire small bowel. The aim of this study was to compare L44 with positive and neutral conventional OC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leander, Peter, Stathis, Georgios, Casal-Dujat, Lucia, Boman, Karolina, Adnerhill, Ingvar, Marsal, Jan, Böök, Olof, Fork, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35378633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00267-z
_version_ 1784681325095026688
author Leander, Peter
Stathis, Georgios
Casal-Dujat, Lucia
Boman, Karolina
Adnerhill, Ingvar
Marsal, Jan
Böök, Olof
Fork, Thomas
author_facet Leander, Peter
Stathis, Georgios
Casal-Dujat, Lucia
Boman, Karolina
Adnerhill, Ingvar
Marsal, Jan
Böök, Olof
Fork, Thomas
author_sort Leander, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A negative oral contrast agent (OCA) has been long sought for, to better delineate the bowel and visualise surrounding structures. Lumentin® 44 (L44) is a new OCA formulated to fill the entire small bowel. The aim of this study was to compare L44 with positive and neutral conventional OCA in abdominal computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Forty-five oncologic patients were randomised to receive either L44 or one of the two comparators (MoviPrep® or diluted Omnipaque®). Abdominal CT examinations with intravenous contrast agent were acquired according to standard protocols. The studies were read independently by two senior radiologists. RESULTS: The mean intraluminal Hounsfield units (HU)-values of regions-of-interest (ROIs) for each subsegment of small bowel and treatment group were -404.0 HU for L44, 166.1 HU for Omnipaque®, and 16.7 HU for MoviPrep® (L44 versus Omnipaque, p < 0.001: L44 versus MoviPrep p < 0.001; Omnipaque versus MoviPrep, p = 0.003). Adverse events, only mild, using L44 were numerically fewer than for using conventional oral contrast agents. Visualisation of abdominal structures beyond the small bowel was similar to the comparators. CONCLUSIONS: L44 is a negative OCA with luminal radiodensity at approximately -400 HU creating a unique small bowel appearance on CT scans. The high bowel wall-to-lumen contrast may enable improved visualisation in a range of pathologic conditions. L44 showed a good safety profile and was well accepted by patients studied. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT (2017-002368-42) and in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03326518). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41747-022-00267-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8980139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89801392022-04-22 A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial Leander, Peter Stathis, Georgios Casal-Dujat, Lucia Boman, Karolina Adnerhill, Ingvar Marsal, Jan Böök, Olof Fork, Thomas Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: A negative oral contrast agent (OCA) has been long sought for, to better delineate the bowel and visualise surrounding structures. Lumentin® 44 (L44) is a new OCA formulated to fill the entire small bowel. The aim of this study was to compare L44 with positive and neutral conventional OCA in abdominal computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Forty-five oncologic patients were randomised to receive either L44 or one of the two comparators (MoviPrep® or diluted Omnipaque®). Abdominal CT examinations with intravenous contrast agent were acquired according to standard protocols. The studies were read independently by two senior radiologists. RESULTS: The mean intraluminal Hounsfield units (HU)-values of regions-of-interest (ROIs) for each subsegment of small bowel and treatment group were -404.0 HU for L44, 166.1 HU for Omnipaque®, and 16.7 HU for MoviPrep® (L44 versus Omnipaque, p < 0.001: L44 versus MoviPrep p < 0.001; Omnipaque versus MoviPrep, p = 0.003). Adverse events, only mild, using L44 were numerically fewer than for using conventional oral contrast agents. Visualisation of abdominal structures beyond the small bowel was similar to the comparators. CONCLUSIONS: L44 is a negative OCA with luminal radiodensity at approximately -400 HU creating a unique small bowel appearance on CT scans. The high bowel wall-to-lumen contrast may enable improved visualisation in a range of pathologic conditions. L44 showed a good safety profile and was well accepted by patients studied. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT (2017-002368-42) and in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03326518). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41747-022-00267-z. Springer Vienna 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8980139/ /pubmed/35378633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00267-z Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Leander, Peter
Stathis, Georgios
Casal-Dujat, Lucia
Boman, Karolina
Adnerhill, Ingvar
Marsal, Jan
Böök, Olof
Fork, Thomas
A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial
title A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial
title_full A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial
title_fullStr A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial
title_full_unstemmed A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial
title_short A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial
title_sort novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal ct: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35378633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00267-z
work_keys_str_mv AT leanderpeter anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT stathisgeorgios anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT casaldujatlucia anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT bomankarolina anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT adnerhillingvar anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT marsaljan anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT bookolof anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT forkthomas anovelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT leanderpeter novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT stathisgeorgios novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT casaldujatlucia novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT bomankarolina novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT adnerhillingvar novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT marsaljan novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT bookolof novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial
AT forkthomas novelfoodbasednegativeoralcontrastagentcomparedwithtwoconventionaloralcontrastagentsinabdominalctathreearmparallelblindedrandomisedcontrolledsinglecentretrial