Cargando…
Enhanced Recovery Care vs. Traditional Care in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery care could alleviate surgical stress and accelerate the recovery rates of patients. Previous studies showed the benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery program in liver surgery, but the exact role in laparoscopic hepatectomy is still unclear. AIM: We aimed to perfor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35392058 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.850844 |
_version_ | 1784681388711084032 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Xueyin Zhou, Xueyi Cao, Jiasheng Hu, Jiahao Topatana, Win Li, Shijie Juengpanich, Sarun Lu, Ziyi Zhang, Bin Feng, Xu Shen, Jiliang Chen, Mingyu |
author_facet | Zhou, Xueyin Zhou, Xueyi Cao, Jiasheng Hu, Jiahao Topatana, Win Li, Shijie Juengpanich, Sarun Lu, Ziyi Zhang, Bin Feng, Xu Shen, Jiliang Chen, Mingyu |
author_sort | Zhou, Xueyin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery care could alleviate surgical stress and accelerate the recovery rates of patients. Previous studies showed the benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery program in liver surgery, but the exact role in laparoscopic hepatectomy is still unclear. AIM: We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after a surgery program in laparoscopic hepatectomy. METHODS: The relative studies from a specific search of PUBMED, EMBASE, OVID, and Cochrane database from June 2008 to February 2022 were selected and included in this meta-analysis. The primary outcomes included length of hospital stay, duration to functional recovery, and overall postoperative complication rate. The secondary outcomes included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, cost of hospitalization, readmission rate, Grade I complication rate, and Grade II–V complication rate. RESULTS: A total of six studies with 643 patients [enhanced recovery care (n = 274) vs. traditional care (n = 369)] were eligible for analysis. These comprised three randomized controlled trials and three retrospective studies. Enhanced recovery care group was associated with decreased hospital stay [standard mean difference (SMD) = −0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.83~−0.28, p < 0.0001], shorter duration to functional recovery (SMD = −1.14, 95% CI = −1.92~−0.37, p = 0.004), and lower cost of hospitalization Mean Difference (MD) = −1,539.62, 95% CI = −1992.85~−1086.39, p < 0.00001). Moreover, a lower overall postoperative complication rate was observed in enhanced recovery care group [Risk ratio (RR) = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.51~0.80, p < 0.0001] as well as lower Grade II–V complication rate (RR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.38~0.80, p = 0.002), while there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (MD = −65.75, 95% CI = −158.47~26.97, p = 0.16), operative time (MD = −5.44, 95% CI = −43.46~32.58, p = 0.78), intraoperative blood transfusion rate [Odds ratio (OR) = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.41~1.22, p = 0.22], and Grade I complication rate (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.53~1.03, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Enhanced recovery care in laparoscopic hepatectomy should be recommended, because it is not only safe and effective, but also can accelerate the postoperative recovery and lighten the financial burden of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8980421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89804212022-04-06 Enhanced Recovery Care vs. Traditional Care in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhou, Xueyin Zhou, Xueyi Cao, Jiasheng Hu, Jiahao Topatana, Win Li, Shijie Juengpanich, Sarun Lu, Ziyi Zhang, Bin Feng, Xu Shen, Jiliang Chen, Mingyu Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery care could alleviate surgical stress and accelerate the recovery rates of patients. Previous studies showed the benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery program in liver surgery, but the exact role in laparoscopic hepatectomy is still unclear. AIM: We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after a surgery program in laparoscopic hepatectomy. METHODS: The relative studies from a specific search of PUBMED, EMBASE, OVID, and Cochrane database from June 2008 to February 2022 were selected and included in this meta-analysis. The primary outcomes included length of hospital stay, duration to functional recovery, and overall postoperative complication rate. The secondary outcomes included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, cost of hospitalization, readmission rate, Grade I complication rate, and Grade II–V complication rate. RESULTS: A total of six studies with 643 patients [enhanced recovery care (n = 274) vs. traditional care (n = 369)] were eligible for analysis. These comprised three randomized controlled trials and three retrospective studies. Enhanced recovery care group was associated with decreased hospital stay [standard mean difference (SMD) = −0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.83~−0.28, p < 0.0001], shorter duration to functional recovery (SMD = −1.14, 95% CI = −1.92~−0.37, p = 0.004), and lower cost of hospitalization Mean Difference (MD) = −1,539.62, 95% CI = −1992.85~−1086.39, p < 0.00001). Moreover, a lower overall postoperative complication rate was observed in enhanced recovery care group [Risk ratio (RR) = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.51~0.80, p < 0.0001] as well as lower Grade II–V complication rate (RR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.38~0.80, p = 0.002), while there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (MD = −65.75, 95% CI = −158.47~26.97, p = 0.16), operative time (MD = −5.44, 95% CI = −43.46~32.58, p = 0.78), intraoperative blood transfusion rate [Odds ratio (OR) = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.41~1.22, p = 0.22], and Grade I complication rate (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.53~1.03, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Enhanced recovery care in laparoscopic hepatectomy should be recommended, because it is not only safe and effective, but also can accelerate the postoperative recovery and lighten the financial burden of patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8980421/ /pubmed/35392058 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.850844 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhou, Zhou, Cao, Hu, Topatana, Li, Juengpanich, Lu, Zhang, Feng, Shen and Chen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Zhou, Xueyin Zhou, Xueyi Cao, Jiasheng Hu, Jiahao Topatana, Win Li, Shijie Juengpanich, Sarun Lu, Ziyi Zhang, Bin Feng, Xu Shen, Jiliang Chen, Mingyu Enhanced Recovery Care vs. Traditional Care in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Enhanced Recovery Care vs. Traditional Care in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Enhanced Recovery Care vs. Traditional Care in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Enhanced Recovery Care vs. Traditional Care in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhanced Recovery Care vs. Traditional Care in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Enhanced Recovery Care vs. Traditional Care in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | enhanced recovery care vs. traditional care in laparoscopic hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35392058 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.850844 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouxueyin enhancedrecoverycarevstraditionalcareinlaparoscopichepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhouxueyi enhancedrecoverycarevstraditionalcareinlaparoscopichepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT caojiasheng enhancedrecoverycarevstraditionalcareinlaparoscopichepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hujiahao enhancedrecoverycarevstraditionalcareinlaparoscopichepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT topatanawin enhancedrecoverycarevstraditionalcareinlaparoscopichepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lishijie enhancedrecoverycarevstraditionalcareinlaparoscopichepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT juengpanichsarun enhancedrecoverycarevstraditionalcareinlaparoscopichepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luziyi enhancedrecoverycarevstraditionalcareinlaparoscopichepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangbin enhancedrecoverycarevstraditionalcareinlaparoscopichepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fengxu enhancedrecoverycarevstraditionalcareinlaparoscopichepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shenjiliang enhancedrecoverycarevstraditionalcareinlaparoscopichepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenmingyu enhancedrecoverycarevstraditionalcareinlaparoscopichepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |