Cargando…

Measuring Hidden Support for Physical Intimate Partner Violence: A List Randomization Experiment in South-Central Ethiopia

Understanding how and why physical intimate partner violence (IPV) persists in high-risk communities has proven difficult. As IPV is both sensitive and illegal, people may be inclined to misreport their views and experiences. By embedding a list randomization experiment (LRE), which increases respon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibson, Mhairi A., Gurmu, Eshetu, Cobo, Beatriz, Rueda, María M., Scott, Isabel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32370582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260520914546
_version_ 1784681396619444224
author Gibson, Mhairi A.
Gurmu, Eshetu
Cobo, Beatriz
Rueda, María M.
Scott, Isabel M.
author_facet Gibson, Mhairi A.
Gurmu, Eshetu
Cobo, Beatriz
Rueda, María M.
Scott, Isabel M.
author_sort Gibson, Mhairi A.
collection PubMed
description Understanding how and why physical intimate partner violence (IPV) persists in high-risk communities has proven difficult. As IPV is both sensitive and illegal, people may be inclined to misreport their views and experiences. By embedding a list randomization experiment (LRE), which increases respondent privacy, in a survey of 809 adult Arsi Oromo men and women in rural south-central Ethiopia, we test the reliability of direct questioning survey methods (e.g., used in the Demographic and Health Surveys) for measuring attitudes that underpin the acceptability of IPV. Participants were randomly assigned versions of the survey in which they were asked either directly or indirectly about the acceptability of wife-beating. By comparing responses across these surveys, we identify the extent to which views are being misreported using direct questioning methods, as well as identifying the “true” predictors of continued support for wife-beating. Indirect questioning reveals that almost one third of the sample believe that wife-beating is acceptable. Adults (particularly men) who are less educated (<3 years schooling) or living in households where women do not participate in economic decision making are among those most likely to identify wife-beating as justifiable (>50% endorsement). These individuals, however, are also more inclined to hide their approval when asked directly by an interviewer. That we find high but underreported support for wife-beating among some members of the community demonstrates a clear need to encourage a more open dialogue, to prevent violence toward women remaining undetected and thus unchanged. This finding also raises questions about the accuracy of traditional direct questioning for capturing information on IPV attitudes and norms. Of relevance to policy, we find that wife-beating is entirely absent only among adults with higher levels of education, living in households where decision making is shared between couples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8980453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89804532022-04-06 Measuring Hidden Support for Physical Intimate Partner Violence: A List Randomization Experiment in South-Central Ethiopia Gibson, Mhairi A. Gurmu, Eshetu Cobo, Beatriz Rueda, María M. Scott, Isabel M. J Interpers Violence Original Research Understanding how and why physical intimate partner violence (IPV) persists in high-risk communities has proven difficult. As IPV is both sensitive and illegal, people may be inclined to misreport their views and experiences. By embedding a list randomization experiment (LRE), which increases respondent privacy, in a survey of 809 adult Arsi Oromo men and women in rural south-central Ethiopia, we test the reliability of direct questioning survey methods (e.g., used in the Demographic and Health Surveys) for measuring attitudes that underpin the acceptability of IPV. Participants were randomly assigned versions of the survey in which they were asked either directly or indirectly about the acceptability of wife-beating. By comparing responses across these surveys, we identify the extent to which views are being misreported using direct questioning methods, as well as identifying the “true” predictors of continued support for wife-beating. Indirect questioning reveals that almost one third of the sample believe that wife-beating is acceptable. Adults (particularly men) who are less educated (<3 years schooling) or living in households where women do not participate in economic decision making are among those most likely to identify wife-beating as justifiable (>50% endorsement). These individuals, however, are also more inclined to hide their approval when asked directly by an interviewer. That we find high but underreported support for wife-beating among some members of the community demonstrates a clear need to encourage a more open dialogue, to prevent violence toward women remaining undetected and thus unchanged. This finding also raises questions about the accuracy of traditional direct questioning for capturing information on IPV attitudes and norms. Of relevance to policy, we find that wife-beating is entirely absent only among adults with higher levels of education, living in households where decision making is shared between couples. SAGE Publications 2020-05-05 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8980453/ /pubmed/32370582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260520914546 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Gibson, Mhairi A.
Gurmu, Eshetu
Cobo, Beatriz
Rueda, María M.
Scott, Isabel M.
Measuring Hidden Support for Physical Intimate Partner Violence: A List Randomization Experiment in South-Central Ethiopia
title Measuring Hidden Support for Physical Intimate Partner Violence: A List Randomization Experiment in South-Central Ethiopia
title_full Measuring Hidden Support for Physical Intimate Partner Violence: A List Randomization Experiment in South-Central Ethiopia
title_fullStr Measuring Hidden Support for Physical Intimate Partner Violence: A List Randomization Experiment in South-Central Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Hidden Support for Physical Intimate Partner Violence: A List Randomization Experiment in South-Central Ethiopia
title_short Measuring Hidden Support for Physical Intimate Partner Violence: A List Randomization Experiment in South-Central Ethiopia
title_sort measuring hidden support for physical intimate partner violence: a list randomization experiment in south-central ethiopia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32370582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260520914546
work_keys_str_mv AT gibsonmhairia measuringhiddensupportforphysicalintimatepartnerviolencealistrandomizationexperimentinsouthcentralethiopia
AT gurmueshetu measuringhiddensupportforphysicalintimatepartnerviolencealistrandomizationexperimentinsouthcentralethiopia
AT cobobeatriz measuringhiddensupportforphysicalintimatepartnerviolencealistrandomizationexperimentinsouthcentralethiopia
AT ruedamariam measuringhiddensupportforphysicalintimatepartnerviolencealistrandomizationexperimentinsouthcentralethiopia
AT scottisabelm measuringhiddensupportforphysicalintimatepartnerviolencealistrandomizationexperimentinsouthcentralethiopia