Cargando…

Attitudes towards priority setting in the norwegian health care system: a general population survey

BACKGROUND: In an ideal world, everyone would receive medical resources in accordance with their needs. In reality, resources are often scarce and have an alternative use. Thus, we are forced to prioritize. Although Norway is one of the leading countries in normative priority setting work, few descr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solberg, Carl Tollef, Tranvåg, Eirik Joakim, Magelssen, Morten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35382816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07806-9
_version_ 1784681410023391232
author Solberg, Carl Tollef
Tranvåg, Eirik Joakim
Magelssen, Morten
author_facet Solberg, Carl Tollef
Tranvåg, Eirik Joakim
Magelssen, Morten
author_sort Solberg, Carl Tollef
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In an ideal world, everyone would receive medical resources in accordance with their needs. In reality, resources are often scarce and have an alternative use. Thus, we are forced to prioritize. Although Norway is one of the leading countries in normative priority setting work, few descriptive studies have been conducted in the country. To increase legitimacy in priority setting, knowledge about laypeople’s attitudes is central. The aim of the study is therefore to assess the general population’s attitudes towards a broad spectrum of issues pertinent to priority setting in the Norwegian publicly financed health care system. METHODS: We developed an electronic questionnaire that was distributed to a representative sample of 2 540 Norwegians regarding their attitudes towards priority setting in Norway. A total of 1 035 responded (response rate 40.7%). Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: A majority (73.0%) of respondents preferred increased funding of publicly financed health services at the expense of other sectors in society. Moreover, a larger share of the respondents suggested either increased taxes (37.0%) or drawing from the Government Pension Fund Global (31.0%) as sources of funding. However, the respondents were divided on whether it was acceptable to say “no” to new cancer drugs when the effect is low and the price is high: 38.6% somewhat or fully disagreed that this was acceptable, while 46.5% somewhat or fully agreed. Lastly, 84.0% of the respondents did not find it acceptable that the Norwegian municipalities have different standards for providing care services. CONCLUSION: Although the survey suggests support for priority setting among Norwegian laypeople, it has also revealed that a significant minority are reluctant to accept it. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07806-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8980508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89805082022-04-05 Attitudes towards priority setting in the norwegian health care system: a general population survey Solberg, Carl Tollef Tranvåg, Eirik Joakim Magelssen, Morten BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: In an ideal world, everyone would receive medical resources in accordance with their needs. In reality, resources are often scarce and have an alternative use. Thus, we are forced to prioritize. Although Norway is one of the leading countries in normative priority setting work, few descriptive studies have been conducted in the country. To increase legitimacy in priority setting, knowledge about laypeople’s attitudes is central. The aim of the study is therefore to assess the general population’s attitudes towards a broad spectrum of issues pertinent to priority setting in the Norwegian publicly financed health care system. METHODS: We developed an electronic questionnaire that was distributed to a representative sample of 2 540 Norwegians regarding their attitudes towards priority setting in Norway. A total of 1 035 responded (response rate 40.7%). Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: A majority (73.0%) of respondents preferred increased funding of publicly financed health services at the expense of other sectors in society. Moreover, a larger share of the respondents suggested either increased taxes (37.0%) or drawing from the Government Pension Fund Global (31.0%) as sources of funding. However, the respondents were divided on whether it was acceptable to say “no” to new cancer drugs when the effect is low and the price is high: 38.6% somewhat or fully disagreed that this was acceptable, while 46.5% somewhat or fully agreed. Lastly, 84.0% of the respondents did not find it acceptable that the Norwegian municipalities have different standards for providing care services. CONCLUSION: Although the survey suggests support for priority setting among Norwegian laypeople, it has also revealed that a significant minority are reluctant to accept it. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07806-9. BioMed Central 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8980508/ /pubmed/35382816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07806-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Solberg, Carl Tollef
Tranvåg, Eirik Joakim
Magelssen, Morten
Attitudes towards priority setting in the norwegian health care system: a general population survey
title Attitudes towards priority setting in the norwegian health care system: a general population survey
title_full Attitudes towards priority setting in the norwegian health care system: a general population survey
title_fullStr Attitudes towards priority setting in the norwegian health care system: a general population survey
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes towards priority setting in the norwegian health care system: a general population survey
title_short Attitudes towards priority setting in the norwegian health care system: a general population survey
title_sort attitudes towards priority setting in the norwegian health care system: a general population survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35382816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07806-9
work_keys_str_mv AT solbergcarltollef attitudestowardsprioritysettinginthenorwegianhealthcaresystemageneralpopulationsurvey
AT tranvageirikjoakim attitudestowardsprioritysettinginthenorwegianhealthcaresystemageneralpopulationsurvey
AT magelssenmorten attitudestowardsprioritysettinginthenorwegianhealthcaresystemageneralpopulationsurvey