Cargando…

Assessment of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human stool supernatant

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are of growing interest due to their potential diagnostic, disease surveillance, and therapeutic applications. While several studies have evaluated EV isolation methods in various biofluids, there are few if any data on these techniques when applied to stool. The latter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Northrop‐Albrecht, Emmalee J., Taylor, William R., Huang, Bing Q., Kisiel, John B., Lucien, Fabrice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jev2.12208
_version_ 1784681471403884544
author Northrop‐Albrecht, Emmalee J.
Taylor, William R.
Huang, Bing Q.
Kisiel, John B.
Lucien, Fabrice
author_facet Northrop‐Albrecht, Emmalee J.
Taylor, William R.
Huang, Bing Q.
Kisiel, John B.
Lucien, Fabrice
author_sort Northrop‐Albrecht, Emmalee J.
collection PubMed
description Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are of growing interest due to their potential diagnostic, disease surveillance, and therapeutic applications. While several studies have evaluated EV isolation methods in various biofluids, there are few if any data on these techniques when applied to stool. The latter is an ideal biospecimen for studying EVs and colorectal cancer (CRC) because the release of tumour markers by luminal exfoliation into stool occurs earlier than vascular invasion. Since EV release is a conserved mechanism, bacteria in stool contribute to the overall EV population. In this study, we assessed five EV separation methods (ultracentrifugation [UC], precipitation [EQ‐O, EQ‐TC], size exclusion chromatography [SEC], and ultrafiltration [UF]) for total recovery, reproducibility, purity, RNA composition, and protein expression in stool supernatant. CD63, TSG101, and ompA proteins were present in EV fractions from all methods except UC. Human (18s) and bacterial (16s) rRNA was detected in stool EV preparations. Enzymatic treatment prior to extraction is necessary to avoid non‐vesicular RNA contamination. Ultrafiltration had the highest recovery, RNA, and protein yield. After assessing purity further, SEC was the isolation method of choice. These findings serve as the groundwork for future studies that use high throughput omics technologies to investigate the potential of stool‐derived EVs as a source for novel biomarkers for early CRC detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8980777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89807772022-04-11 Assessment of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human stool supernatant Northrop‐Albrecht, Emmalee J. Taylor, William R. Huang, Bing Q. Kisiel, John B. Lucien, Fabrice J Extracell Vesicles Research Articles Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are of growing interest due to their potential diagnostic, disease surveillance, and therapeutic applications. While several studies have evaluated EV isolation methods in various biofluids, there are few if any data on these techniques when applied to stool. The latter is an ideal biospecimen for studying EVs and colorectal cancer (CRC) because the release of tumour markers by luminal exfoliation into stool occurs earlier than vascular invasion. Since EV release is a conserved mechanism, bacteria in stool contribute to the overall EV population. In this study, we assessed five EV separation methods (ultracentrifugation [UC], precipitation [EQ‐O, EQ‐TC], size exclusion chromatography [SEC], and ultrafiltration [UF]) for total recovery, reproducibility, purity, RNA composition, and protein expression in stool supernatant. CD63, TSG101, and ompA proteins were present in EV fractions from all methods except UC. Human (18s) and bacterial (16s) rRNA was detected in stool EV preparations. Enzymatic treatment prior to extraction is necessary to avoid non‐vesicular RNA contamination. Ultrafiltration had the highest recovery, RNA, and protein yield. After assessing purity further, SEC was the isolation method of choice. These findings serve as the groundwork for future studies that use high throughput omics technologies to investigate the potential of stool‐derived EVs as a source for novel biomarkers for early CRC detection. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-05 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8980777/ /pubmed/35383410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jev2.12208 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Northrop‐Albrecht, Emmalee J.
Taylor, William R.
Huang, Bing Q.
Kisiel, John B.
Lucien, Fabrice
Assessment of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human stool supernatant
title Assessment of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human stool supernatant
title_full Assessment of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human stool supernatant
title_fullStr Assessment of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human stool supernatant
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human stool supernatant
title_short Assessment of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human stool supernatant
title_sort assessment of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human stool supernatant
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jev2.12208
work_keys_str_mv AT northropalbrechtemmaleej assessmentofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanstoolsupernatant
AT taylorwilliamr assessmentofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanstoolsupernatant
AT huangbingq assessmentofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanstoolsupernatant
AT kisieljohnb assessmentofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanstoolsupernatant
AT lucienfabrice assessmentofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanstoolsupernatant