Cargando…

Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19

PURPOSE: To characterize alterations in pupillary light reflex responses in subjects following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially those with long-COVID. METHODS: Thirty-five subjects with previous COVID-19 and 30 healthy control participants were enrolled in this cross-sectional compara...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bitirgen, Gulfidan, Korkmaz, Celalettin, Zamani, Adil, Iyisoy, Mehmet Sinan, Kerimoglu, Hurkan, Malik, Rayaz A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35380318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02275-9
_version_ 1784681473860698112
author Bitirgen, Gulfidan
Korkmaz, Celalettin
Zamani, Adil
Iyisoy, Mehmet Sinan
Kerimoglu, Hurkan
Malik, Rayaz A.
author_facet Bitirgen, Gulfidan
Korkmaz, Celalettin
Zamani, Adil
Iyisoy, Mehmet Sinan
Kerimoglu, Hurkan
Malik, Rayaz A.
author_sort Bitirgen, Gulfidan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To characterize alterations in pupillary light reflex responses in subjects following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially those with long-COVID. METHODS: Thirty-five subjects with previous COVID-19 and 30 healthy control participants were enrolled in this cross-sectional comparative study. An infrared dynamic pupillometry system (MonPack One; Metrovision, France) was used to quantify pupillary light responses. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) long-COVID questionnaire was used to identify persisting symptoms at least 4 weeks after acute COVID-19. RESULTS: The median time after the diagnosis of acute COVID-19 was 4.0 (2.0–5.0) months. There was an increase in the latency of pupil contraction (P = 0.001) and a reduction in the duration of pupil contraction (P = 0.039) in post-COVID-19 subjects compared to healthy controls. No significant differences were observed in the initial pupil diameter, amplitude and velocity of pupil contraction or latency, velocity and duration of pupil dilation. Long-COVID was present in 25/35 (71%) subjects and their duration of pupil contraction was reduced compared to subjects without long-COVID (P = 0.009). The NICE long-COVID questionnaire total score (ρ = − 0.507; P = 0.002) and neurological score (ρ = − 0.412; P = 0.014) correlated with the duration of pupil contraction and the total score correlated with the latency of dilation (ρ = − 0.352; P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Dynamic pupillometry reveals significant alterations in contractile pupillary light responses, indicative of parasympathetic dysfunction after COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8980787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89807872022-04-05 Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19 Bitirgen, Gulfidan Korkmaz, Celalettin Zamani, Adil Iyisoy, Mehmet Sinan Kerimoglu, Hurkan Malik, Rayaz A. Int Ophthalmol Original Paper PURPOSE: To characterize alterations in pupillary light reflex responses in subjects following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially those with long-COVID. METHODS: Thirty-five subjects with previous COVID-19 and 30 healthy control participants were enrolled in this cross-sectional comparative study. An infrared dynamic pupillometry system (MonPack One; Metrovision, France) was used to quantify pupillary light responses. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) long-COVID questionnaire was used to identify persisting symptoms at least 4 weeks after acute COVID-19. RESULTS: The median time after the diagnosis of acute COVID-19 was 4.0 (2.0–5.0) months. There was an increase in the latency of pupil contraction (P = 0.001) and a reduction in the duration of pupil contraction (P = 0.039) in post-COVID-19 subjects compared to healthy controls. No significant differences were observed in the initial pupil diameter, amplitude and velocity of pupil contraction or latency, velocity and duration of pupil dilation. Long-COVID was present in 25/35 (71%) subjects and their duration of pupil contraction was reduced compared to subjects without long-COVID (P = 0.009). The NICE long-COVID questionnaire total score (ρ = − 0.507; P = 0.002) and neurological score (ρ = − 0.412; P = 0.014) correlated with the duration of pupil contraction and the total score correlated with the latency of dilation (ρ = − 0.352; P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Dynamic pupillometry reveals significant alterations in contractile pupillary light responses, indicative of parasympathetic dysfunction after COVID-19. Springer Netherlands 2022-04-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8980787/ /pubmed/35380318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02275-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Bitirgen, Gulfidan
Korkmaz, Celalettin
Zamani, Adil
Iyisoy, Mehmet Sinan
Kerimoglu, Hurkan
Malik, Rayaz A.
Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19
title Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19
title_full Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19
title_fullStr Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19
title_short Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19
title_sort abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following covid-19
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35380318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02275-9
work_keys_str_mv AT bitirgengulfidan abnormalquantitativepupillarylightresponsesfollowingcovid19
AT korkmazcelalettin abnormalquantitativepupillarylightresponsesfollowingcovid19
AT zamaniadil abnormalquantitativepupillarylightresponsesfollowingcovid19
AT iyisoymehmetsinan abnormalquantitativepupillarylightresponsesfollowingcovid19
AT kerimogluhurkan abnormalquantitativepupillarylightresponsesfollowingcovid19
AT malikrayaza abnormalquantitativepupillarylightresponsesfollowingcovid19