Cargando…
Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19
PURPOSE: To characterize alterations in pupillary light reflex responses in subjects following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially those with long-COVID. METHODS: Thirty-five subjects with previous COVID-19 and 30 healthy control participants were enrolled in this cross-sectional compara...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35380318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02275-9 |
_version_ | 1784681473860698112 |
---|---|
author | Bitirgen, Gulfidan Korkmaz, Celalettin Zamani, Adil Iyisoy, Mehmet Sinan Kerimoglu, Hurkan Malik, Rayaz A. |
author_facet | Bitirgen, Gulfidan Korkmaz, Celalettin Zamani, Adil Iyisoy, Mehmet Sinan Kerimoglu, Hurkan Malik, Rayaz A. |
author_sort | Bitirgen, Gulfidan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To characterize alterations in pupillary light reflex responses in subjects following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially those with long-COVID. METHODS: Thirty-five subjects with previous COVID-19 and 30 healthy control participants were enrolled in this cross-sectional comparative study. An infrared dynamic pupillometry system (MonPack One; Metrovision, France) was used to quantify pupillary light responses. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) long-COVID questionnaire was used to identify persisting symptoms at least 4 weeks after acute COVID-19. RESULTS: The median time after the diagnosis of acute COVID-19 was 4.0 (2.0–5.0) months. There was an increase in the latency of pupil contraction (P = 0.001) and a reduction in the duration of pupil contraction (P = 0.039) in post-COVID-19 subjects compared to healthy controls. No significant differences were observed in the initial pupil diameter, amplitude and velocity of pupil contraction or latency, velocity and duration of pupil dilation. Long-COVID was present in 25/35 (71%) subjects and their duration of pupil contraction was reduced compared to subjects without long-COVID (P = 0.009). The NICE long-COVID questionnaire total score (ρ = − 0.507; P = 0.002) and neurological score (ρ = − 0.412; P = 0.014) correlated with the duration of pupil contraction and the total score correlated with the latency of dilation (ρ = − 0.352; P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Dynamic pupillometry reveals significant alterations in contractile pupillary light responses, indicative of parasympathetic dysfunction after COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8980787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89807872022-04-05 Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19 Bitirgen, Gulfidan Korkmaz, Celalettin Zamani, Adil Iyisoy, Mehmet Sinan Kerimoglu, Hurkan Malik, Rayaz A. Int Ophthalmol Original Paper PURPOSE: To characterize alterations in pupillary light reflex responses in subjects following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially those with long-COVID. METHODS: Thirty-five subjects with previous COVID-19 and 30 healthy control participants were enrolled in this cross-sectional comparative study. An infrared dynamic pupillometry system (MonPack One; Metrovision, France) was used to quantify pupillary light responses. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) long-COVID questionnaire was used to identify persisting symptoms at least 4 weeks after acute COVID-19. RESULTS: The median time after the diagnosis of acute COVID-19 was 4.0 (2.0–5.0) months. There was an increase in the latency of pupil contraction (P = 0.001) and a reduction in the duration of pupil contraction (P = 0.039) in post-COVID-19 subjects compared to healthy controls. No significant differences were observed in the initial pupil diameter, amplitude and velocity of pupil contraction or latency, velocity and duration of pupil dilation. Long-COVID was present in 25/35 (71%) subjects and their duration of pupil contraction was reduced compared to subjects without long-COVID (P = 0.009). The NICE long-COVID questionnaire total score (ρ = − 0.507; P = 0.002) and neurological score (ρ = − 0.412; P = 0.014) correlated with the duration of pupil contraction and the total score correlated with the latency of dilation (ρ = − 0.352; P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Dynamic pupillometry reveals significant alterations in contractile pupillary light responses, indicative of parasympathetic dysfunction after COVID-19. Springer Netherlands 2022-04-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8980787/ /pubmed/35380318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02275-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Bitirgen, Gulfidan Korkmaz, Celalettin Zamani, Adil Iyisoy, Mehmet Sinan Kerimoglu, Hurkan Malik, Rayaz A. Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19 |
title | Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19 |
title_full | Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19 |
title_short | Abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following COVID-19 |
title_sort | abnormal quantitative pupillary light responses following covid-19 |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35380318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02275-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bitirgengulfidan abnormalquantitativepupillarylightresponsesfollowingcovid19 AT korkmazcelalettin abnormalquantitativepupillarylightresponsesfollowingcovid19 AT zamaniadil abnormalquantitativepupillarylightresponsesfollowingcovid19 AT iyisoymehmetsinan abnormalquantitativepupillarylightresponsesfollowingcovid19 AT kerimogluhurkan abnormalquantitativepupillarylightresponsesfollowingcovid19 AT malikrayaza abnormalquantitativepupillarylightresponsesfollowingcovid19 |