Cargando…

Alternative management of proximal aortic dissection: concept and application

Open surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for acute type A aortic dissection and should be offered to most patients. However, there are elderly patients in which surgical treatment may be deemed extremely high risk or futile. Endovascular treatment approaches have been applied to a small number...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Xun, Mitsis, Andreas, Mozalbat, David, Nienaber, Christoph A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35463707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12055-021-01281-3
_version_ 1784681508096704512
author Yuan, Xun
Mitsis, Andreas
Mozalbat, David
Nienaber, Christoph A.
author_facet Yuan, Xun
Mitsis, Andreas
Mozalbat, David
Nienaber, Christoph A.
author_sort Yuan, Xun
collection PubMed
description Open surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for acute type A aortic dissection and should be offered to most patients. However, there are elderly patients in which surgical treatment may be deemed extremely high risk or futile. Endovascular treatment approaches have been applied to a small number of these patients and data are limited to case reports and small series. The application of endovascular therapies to ascending aorta is currently limited by anatomical and technical challenges posed by the dynamic motion of the ascending aorta and the proximity of vital structures to intended landing zones (aortic valve, coronary arteries, and supra-aortic branches) and lack of specially designed endografts to address these issues. While thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has replaced open aortic repair for a suitable lesion in distal aortic dissection, some selected patients with type A aortic dissection at high surgical may be candidates. Hence, there is potential because, in proximal (Stanford type A) dissections, 10–30% of patients are not accepted for surgery, and 30–50% are technically amenable for TEVAR. Recent experience has shown that carefully selected patients with favorable anatomical characteristics may be subject to endovascular stent-graft treatment as a last resort with mixed results. Technical improvement is necessary to offer. satisfactory endovascular options in non-surgical candidates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8980987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89809872022-04-22 Alternative management of proximal aortic dissection: concept and application Yuan, Xun Mitsis, Andreas Mozalbat, David Nienaber, Christoph A. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Review Article Open surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for acute type A aortic dissection and should be offered to most patients. However, there are elderly patients in which surgical treatment may be deemed extremely high risk or futile. Endovascular treatment approaches have been applied to a small number of these patients and data are limited to case reports and small series. The application of endovascular therapies to ascending aorta is currently limited by anatomical and technical challenges posed by the dynamic motion of the ascending aorta and the proximity of vital structures to intended landing zones (aortic valve, coronary arteries, and supra-aortic branches) and lack of specially designed endografts to address these issues. While thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has replaced open aortic repair for a suitable lesion in distal aortic dissection, some selected patients with type A aortic dissection at high surgical may be candidates. Hence, there is potential because, in proximal (Stanford type A) dissections, 10–30% of patients are not accepted for surgery, and 30–50% are technically amenable for TEVAR. Recent experience has shown that carefully selected patients with favorable anatomical characteristics may be subject to endovascular stent-graft treatment as a last resort with mixed results. Technical improvement is necessary to offer. satisfactory endovascular options in non-surgical candidates. Springer Singapore 2021-12-13 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8980987/ /pubmed/35463707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12055-021-01281-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Yuan, Xun
Mitsis, Andreas
Mozalbat, David
Nienaber, Christoph A.
Alternative management of proximal aortic dissection: concept and application
title Alternative management of proximal aortic dissection: concept and application
title_full Alternative management of proximal aortic dissection: concept and application
title_fullStr Alternative management of proximal aortic dissection: concept and application
title_full_unstemmed Alternative management of proximal aortic dissection: concept and application
title_short Alternative management of proximal aortic dissection: concept and application
title_sort alternative management of proximal aortic dissection: concept and application
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35463707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12055-021-01281-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanxun alternativemanagementofproximalaorticdissectionconceptandapplication
AT mitsisandreas alternativemanagementofproximalaorticdissectionconceptandapplication
AT mozalbatdavid alternativemanagementofproximalaorticdissectionconceptandapplication
AT nienaberchristopha alternativemanagementofproximalaorticdissectionconceptandapplication