Cargando…

Instruments for measuring patient safety competencies in nursing: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Patient safety competencies in nursing are essential for the quality of healthcare. To develop practices and collaboration in nursing care, valid instruments that measure competencies in patient safety are needed. OBJECTIVE: To identify instruments that measure the patient safety compete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mortensen, Michael, Naustdal, Kristin Igland, Uibu, Ere, Mägi, Liisi, Kangasniemi, Mari, Põlluste, Kaja, Moi, Asgjerd L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8981364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001751
_version_ 1784681588036993024
author Mortensen, Michael
Naustdal, Kristin Igland
Uibu, Ere
Mägi, Liisi
Kangasniemi, Mari
Põlluste, Kaja
Moi, Asgjerd L
author_facet Mortensen, Michael
Naustdal, Kristin Igland
Uibu, Ere
Mägi, Liisi
Kangasniemi, Mari
Põlluste, Kaja
Moi, Asgjerd L
author_sort Mortensen, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient safety competencies in nursing are essential for the quality of healthcare. To develop practices and collaboration in nursing care, valid instruments that measure competencies in patient safety are needed. OBJECTIVE: To identify instruments that measure the patient safety competencies of nurses. DESIGN: A scoping review. DATA SOURCES: The Cochran Library, Epistemonikos, Eric, Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched for articles reporting on instruments measuring patient safety competence in nursing. The search was limited to English peer-reviewed scientific papers published from January 2010 to April 2021. REVIEW METHOD: A blinded selection of articles fulfilling the inclusion criteria was performed by two researchers based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Data were then extracted, synthesised and presented in tables and text. RESULTS: Our search identified 1,426 papers, of which 32 met the inclusion criteria. The selected papers described nine instruments, of which the ‘Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey’ was the most used instrument. The identified instruments comprised domains for patient safety skills, attitudes, knowledge, communication, teamwork and errors. The instruments had been tested for content (face) and construct validity as well as for reliability. However, sensitivity and responsiveness were rarely assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Over the last decade, there has been a growing body of instruments aimed at measuring patient safety competencies among nurses. The future development of new instruments should consider including the important dimension of ethics in patient safety as well as evaluating the instrument’s responsiveness to be able to track changes over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8981364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89813642022-04-22 Instruments for measuring patient safety competencies in nursing: a scoping review Mortensen, Michael Naustdal, Kristin Igland Uibu, Ere Mägi, Liisi Kangasniemi, Mari Põlluste, Kaja Moi, Asgjerd L BMJ Open Qual Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Patient safety competencies in nursing are essential for the quality of healthcare. To develop practices and collaboration in nursing care, valid instruments that measure competencies in patient safety are needed. OBJECTIVE: To identify instruments that measure the patient safety competencies of nurses. DESIGN: A scoping review. DATA SOURCES: The Cochran Library, Epistemonikos, Eric, Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched for articles reporting on instruments measuring patient safety competence in nursing. The search was limited to English peer-reviewed scientific papers published from January 2010 to April 2021. REVIEW METHOD: A blinded selection of articles fulfilling the inclusion criteria was performed by two researchers based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Data were then extracted, synthesised and presented in tables and text. RESULTS: Our search identified 1,426 papers, of which 32 met the inclusion criteria. The selected papers described nine instruments, of which the ‘Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey’ was the most used instrument. The identified instruments comprised domains for patient safety skills, attitudes, knowledge, communication, teamwork and errors. The instruments had been tested for content (face) and construct validity as well as for reliability. However, sensitivity and responsiveness were rarely assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Over the last decade, there has been a growing body of instruments aimed at measuring patient safety competencies among nurses. The future development of new instruments should consider including the important dimension of ethics in patient safety as well as evaluating the instrument’s responsiveness to be able to track changes over time. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8981364/ /pubmed/35379672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001751 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Mortensen, Michael
Naustdal, Kristin Igland
Uibu, Ere
Mägi, Liisi
Kangasniemi, Mari
Põlluste, Kaja
Moi, Asgjerd L
Instruments for measuring patient safety competencies in nursing: a scoping review
title Instruments for measuring patient safety competencies in nursing: a scoping review
title_full Instruments for measuring patient safety competencies in nursing: a scoping review
title_fullStr Instruments for measuring patient safety competencies in nursing: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Instruments for measuring patient safety competencies in nursing: a scoping review
title_short Instruments for measuring patient safety competencies in nursing: a scoping review
title_sort instruments for measuring patient safety competencies in nursing: a scoping review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8981364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001751
work_keys_str_mv AT mortensenmichael instrumentsformeasuringpatientsafetycompetenciesinnursingascopingreview
AT naustdalkristinigland instrumentsformeasuringpatientsafetycompetenciesinnursingascopingreview
AT uibuere instrumentsformeasuringpatientsafetycompetenciesinnursingascopingreview
AT magiliisi instrumentsformeasuringpatientsafetycompetenciesinnursingascopingreview
AT kangasniemimari instrumentsformeasuringpatientsafetycompetenciesinnursingascopingreview
AT pollustekaja instrumentsformeasuringpatientsafetycompetenciesinnursingascopingreview
AT moiasgjerdl instrumentsformeasuringpatientsafetycompetenciesinnursingascopingreview