Cargando…
Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process
Journal peer review regulates the flow of ideas through an academic discipline and thus has the power to shape what a research community knows, actively investigates, and recommends to policymakers and the wider public. We might assume that editors can identify the ‘best’ experts and rely on them fo...
Autores principales: | Marcoci, Alexandru, Vercammen, Ans, Bush, Martin, Hamilton, Daniel G., Hanea, Anca, Hemming, Victoria, Wintle, Bonnie C., Burgman, Mark, Fidler, Fiona |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8981826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35382867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06016-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with the repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science) process
por: Fraser, Hannah, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Eliciting improved quantitative judgements using the IDEA protocol: A case study in natural resource management
por: Hemming, Victoria, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Pre-screening workers to overcome bias amplification in online labour markets
por: Vercammen, Ans, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Better Together: Reliable Application of the Post-9/11 and Post-Iraq US Intelligence Tradecraft Standards Requires Collective Analysis
por: Marcoci, Alexandru, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Predicting and reasoning about replicability using structured groups
por: Wintle, Bonnie C., et al.
Publicado: (2023)