Cargando…

The role of activation of two different sGC binding sites by NO‐dependent and NO‐independent mechanisms in the regulation of SACs in rat ventricular cardiomyocytes

The mechanoelectrical feedback (MEF) mechanism in the heart that plays a significant role in the occurrence of arrhythmias, involves cation flux through cation nonselective stretch‐activated channels (SACs). It is well known that nitric oxide (NO) can act as a regulator of MEF. Here we addressed the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamkin, Andre G., Kamkina, Olga V., Shim, Andrey L., Bilichenko, Andrey, Mitrokhin, Vadim M., Kazansky, Viktor E., Filatova, Tatiana S., Abramochkin, Denis V., Mladenov, Mitko I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8981922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35384354
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15246
_version_ 1784681703159103488
author Kamkin, Andre G.
Kamkina, Olga V.
Shim, Andrey L.
Bilichenko, Andrey
Mitrokhin, Vadim M.
Kazansky, Viktor E.
Filatova, Tatiana S.
Abramochkin, Denis V.
Mladenov, Mitko I.
author_facet Kamkin, Andre G.
Kamkina, Olga V.
Shim, Andrey L.
Bilichenko, Andrey
Mitrokhin, Vadim M.
Kazansky, Viktor E.
Filatova, Tatiana S.
Abramochkin, Denis V.
Mladenov, Mitko I.
author_sort Kamkin, Andre G.
collection PubMed
description The mechanoelectrical feedback (MEF) mechanism in the heart that plays a significant role in the occurrence of arrhythmias, involves cation flux through cation nonselective stretch‐activated channels (SACs). It is well known that nitric oxide (NO) can act as a regulator of MEF. Here we addressed the possibility of SAC’s regulation along NO‐dependent and NO‐independent pathways, as well as the possibility of S‐nitrosylation of SACs. In freshly isolated rat ventricular cardiomyocytes, using the patch‐clamp method in whole‐cell configuration, inward nonselective stretch‐activated cation current I(SAC) was recorded through SACs, which occurs during dosed cell stretching. NO donor SNAP, α1‐subunit of sGC activator BAY41‐2272, sGC blocker ODQ, PKG blocker KT5823, PKG activator 8Br‐cGMP, and S‐nitrosylation blocker ascorbic acid, were employed. We concluded that the physiological concentration of NO in the cell is a necessary condition for the functioning of SACs. An increase in NO due to SNAP in an unstretched cell causes the appearance of a Gd(3+)‐sensitive nonselective cation current, an analog of I(SAC) , while in a stretched cell it eliminates I(SAC) . The NO‐independent pathway of sGC activation of α subunit, triggered by BAY41‐2272, is also important for the regulation of SACs. Since S‐nitrosylation inhibitor completely abolishes I(SAC) , this mechanism occurs. The application of BAY41‐2272 cannot induce I(SAC) in a nonstretched cell; however, the addition of SNAP on its background activates SACs, rather due to S‐nitrosylation. ODQ eliminates I(SAC) , but SNAP added on the background of stretch increases I(SAC) in addition to ODQ. This may be a result of the lack of NO as a result of inhibition of NOS by metabolically modified ODQ. KT5823 reduces PKG activity and reduces SACs phosphorylation, leading to an increase in I(SAC) . 8Br‐cGMP reduces I(SAC) by activating PKG and its phosphorylation. These results demonstrate a significant contribution of S‐nitrosylation to the regulation of SACs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8981922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89819222022-04-11 The role of activation of two different sGC binding sites by NO‐dependent and NO‐independent mechanisms in the regulation of SACs in rat ventricular cardiomyocytes Kamkin, Andre G. Kamkina, Olga V. Shim, Andrey L. Bilichenko, Andrey Mitrokhin, Vadim M. Kazansky, Viktor E. Filatova, Tatiana S. Abramochkin, Denis V. Mladenov, Mitko I. Physiol Rep Original Articles The mechanoelectrical feedback (MEF) mechanism in the heart that plays a significant role in the occurrence of arrhythmias, involves cation flux through cation nonselective stretch‐activated channels (SACs). It is well known that nitric oxide (NO) can act as a regulator of MEF. Here we addressed the possibility of SAC’s regulation along NO‐dependent and NO‐independent pathways, as well as the possibility of S‐nitrosylation of SACs. In freshly isolated rat ventricular cardiomyocytes, using the patch‐clamp method in whole‐cell configuration, inward nonselective stretch‐activated cation current I(SAC) was recorded through SACs, which occurs during dosed cell stretching. NO donor SNAP, α1‐subunit of sGC activator BAY41‐2272, sGC blocker ODQ, PKG blocker KT5823, PKG activator 8Br‐cGMP, and S‐nitrosylation blocker ascorbic acid, were employed. We concluded that the physiological concentration of NO in the cell is a necessary condition for the functioning of SACs. An increase in NO due to SNAP in an unstretched cell causes the appearance of a Gd(3+)‐sensitive nonselective cation current, an analog of I(SAC) , while in a stretched cell it eliminates I(SAC) . The NO‐independent pathway of sGC activation of α subunit, triggered by BAY41‐2272, is also important for the regulation of SACs. Since S‐nitrosylation inhibitor completely abolishes I(SAC) , this mechanism occurs. The application of BAY41‐2272 cannot induce I(SAC) in a nonstretched cell; however, the addition of SNAP on its background activates SACs, rather due to S‐nitrosylation. ODQ eliminates I(SAC) , but SNAP added on the background of stretch increases I(SAC) in addition to ODQ. This may be a result of the lack of NO as a result of inhibition of NOS by metabolically modified ODQ. KT5823 reduces PKG activity and reduces SACs phosphorylation, leading to an increase in I(SAC) . 8Br‐cGMP reduces I(SAC) by activating PKG and its phosphorylation. These results demonstrate a significant contribution of S‐nitrosylation to the regulation of SACs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8981922/ /pubmed/35384354 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15246 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kamkin, Andre G.
Kamkina, Olga V.
Shim, Andrey L.
Bilichenko, Andrey
Mitrokhin, Vadim M.
Kazansky, Viktor E.
Filatova, Tatiana S.
Abramochkin, Denis V.
Mladenov, Mitko I.
The role of activation of two different sGC binding sites by NO‐dependent and NO‐independent mechanisms in the regulation of SACs in rat ventricular cardiomyocytes
title The role of activation of two different sGC binding sites by NO‐dependent and NO‐independent mechanisms in the regulation of SACs in rat ventricular cardiomyocytes
title_full The role of activation of two different sGC binding sites by NO‐dependent and NO‐independent mechanisms in the regulation of SACs in rat ventricular cardiomyocytes
title_fullStr The role of activation of two different sGC binding sites by NO‐dependent and NO‐independent mechanisms in the regulation of SACs in rat ventricular cardiomyocytes
title_full_unstemmed The role of activation of two different sGC binding sites by NO‐dependent and NO‐independent mechanisms in the regulation of SACs in rat ventricular cardiomyocytes
title_short The role of activation of two different sGC binding sites by NO‐dependent and NO‐independent mechanisms in the regulation of SACs in rat ventricular cardiomyocytes
title_sort role of activation of two different sgc binding sites by no‐dependent and no‐independent mechanisms in the regulation of sacs in rat ventricular cardiomyocytes
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8981922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35384354
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15246
work_keys_str_mv AT kamkinandreg theroleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT kamkinaolgav theroleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT shimandreyl theroleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT bilichenkoandrey theroleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT mitrokhinvadimm theroleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT kazanskyviktore theroleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT filatovatatianas theroleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT abramochkindenisv theroleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT mladenovmitkoi theroleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT kamkinandreg roleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT kamkinaolgav roleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT shimandreyl roleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT bilichenkoandrey roleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT mitrokhinvadimm roleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT kazanskyviktore roleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT filatovatatianas roleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT abramochkindenisv roleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes
AT mladenovmitkoi roleofactivationoftwodifferentsgcbindingsitesbynodependentandnoindependentmechanismsintheregulationofsacsinratventricularcardiomyocytes