Cargando…

CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous

The cocrystallization strategy is considered to be an effective means to adjust the properties of explosives. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanism of the effect of the special cocrystal structure on the decomposition process is not clear enough. The present work compares the response processes of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yan, Yu, Wen-Li, Huang, Huang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8982055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35424606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra09120d
_version_ 1784681727741919232
author Li, Yan
Yu, Wen-Li
Huang, Huang
author_facet Li, Yan
Yu, Wen-Li
Huang, Huang
author_sort Li, Yan
collection PubMed
description The cocrystallization strategy is considered to be an effective means to adjust the properties of explosives. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanism of the effect of the special cocrystal structure on the decomposition process is not clear enough. The present work compares the response processes of a CL-20/TNT cocrystal structure and an amorphous structure under shock waves with different velocities. The thermodynamic evolution, reactant decay, product formation, main initial reactions and cluster evolution are analyzed. As a result, we find that the amorphous structure is easier to compress than the cocrystal structure, achieving higher stress and temperature. These thermodynamic parameters have a strong correlation. For the amorphous structure, the chemical reaction of the system is more intense, the reactants decay faster, the products are more abundant, and the intermediate products can complete the transformation to stable products earlier. Furthermore, NO(2) is the most important intermediate product, and its quantitative change can directly reflect the reaction process. The amorphous structure is more prone to decomposition reaction, and the cocrystal structure is more prone to polymerization reaction. The cluster size in the amorphous structure is smaller and more conducive to decomposition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8982055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89820552022-04-13 CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous Li, Yan Yu, Wen-Li Huang, Huang RSC Adv Chemistry The cocrystallization strategy is considered to be an effective means to adjust the properties of explosives. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanism of the effect of the special cocrystal structure on the decomposition process is not clear enough. The present work compares the response processes of a CL-20/TNT cocrystal structure and an amorphous structure under shock waves with different velocities. The thermodynamic evolution, reactant decay, product formation, main initial reactions and cluster evolution are analyzed. As a result, we find that the amorphous structure is easier to compress than the cocrystal structure, achieving higher stress and temperature. These thermodynamic parameters have a strong correlation. For the amorphous structure, the chemical reaction of the system is more intense, the reactants decay faster, the products are more abundant, and the intermediate products can complete the transformation to stable products earlier. Furthermore, NO(2) is the most important intermediate product, and its quantitative change can directly reflect the reaction process. The amorphous structure is more prone to decomposition reaction, and the cocrystal structure is more prone to polymerization reaction. The cluster size in the amorphous structure is smaller and more conducive to decomposition. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8982055/ /pubmed/35424606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra09120d Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Li, Yan
Yu, Wen-Li
Huang, Huang
CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous
title CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous
title_full CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous
title_fullStr CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous
title_full_unstemmed CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous
title_short CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous
title_sort cl-20/tnt decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8982055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35424606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra09120d
work_keys_str_mv AT liyan cl20tntdecompositionundershockcocrystallineversusamorphous
AT yuwenli cl20tntdecompositionundershockcocrystallineversusamorphous
AT huanghuang cl20tntdecompositionundershockcocrystallineversusamorphous