Cargando…
CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous
The cocrystallization strategy is considered to be an effective means to adjust the properties of explosives. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanism of the effect of the special cocrystal structure on the decomposition process is not clear enough. The present work compares the response processes of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society of Chemistry
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8982055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35424606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra09120d |
_version_ | 1784681727741919232 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yan Yu, Wen-Li Huang, Huang |
author_facet | Li, Yan Yu, Wen-Li Huang, Huang |
author_sort | Li, Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The cocrystallization strategy is considered to be an effective means to adjust the properties of explosives. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanism of the effect of the special cocrystal structure on the decomposition process is not clear enough. The present work compares the response processes of a CL-20/TNT cocrystal structure and an amorphous structure under shock waves with different velocities. The thermodynamic evolution, reactant decay, product formation, main initial reactions and cluster evolution are analyzed. As a result, we find that the amorphous structure is easier to compress than the cocrystal structure, achieving higher stress and temperature. These thermodynamic parameters have a strong correlation. For the amorphous structure, the chemical reaction of the system is more intense, the reactants decay faster, the products are more abundant, and the intermediate products can complete the transformation to stable products earlier. Furthermore, NO(2) is the most important intermediate product, and its quantitative change can directly reflect the reaction process. The amorphous structure is more prone to decomposition reaction, and the cocrystal structure is more prone to polymerization reaction. The cluster size in the amorphous structure is smaller and more conducive to decomposition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8982055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society of Chemistry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89820552022-04-13 CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous Li, Yan Yu, Wen-Li Huang, Huang RSC Adv Chemistry The cocrystallization strategy is considered to be an effective means to adjust the properties of explosives. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanism of the effect of the special cocrystal structure on the decomposition process is not clear enough. The present work compares the response processes of a CL-20/TNT cocrystal structure and an amorphous structure under shock waves with different velocities. The thermodynamic evolution, reactant decay, product formation, main initial reactions and cluster evolution are analyzed. As a result, we find that the amorphous structure is easier to compress than the cocrystal structure, achieving higher stress and temperature. These thermodynamic parameters have a strong correlation. For the amorphous structure, the chemical reaction of the system is more intense, the reactants decay faster, the products are more abundant, and the intermediate products can complete the transformation to stable products earlier. Furthermore, NO(2) is the most important intermediate product, and its quantitative change can directly reflect the reaction process. The amorphous structure is more prone to decomposition reaction, and the cocrystal structure is more prone to polymerization reaction. The cluster size in the amorphous structure is smaller and more conducive to decomposition. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8982055/ /pubmed/35424606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra09120d Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Chemistry Li, Yan Yu, Wen-Li Huang, Huang CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous |
title | CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous |
title_full | CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous |
title_fullStr | CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous |
title_full_unstemmed | CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous |
title_short | CL-20/TNT decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous |
title_sort | cl-20/tnt decomposition under shock: cocrystalline versus amorphous |
topic | Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8982055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35424606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra09120d |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyan cl20tntdecompositionundershockcocrystallineversusamorphous AT yuwenli cl20tntdecompositionundershockcocrystallineversusamorphous AT huanghuang cl20tntdecompositionundershockcocrystallineversusamorphous |