Cargando…

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Absolute Lymphocyte Count as Early Diagnostic Tools for Corona Virus Disease 2019

Background and objectives In comparison to real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing, blood-related parameters including absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) carry an indeterminate potential in the assessment of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahid, Muhammad F, Malik, Asma, Siddiqi, Fuad Ahmad, Fazal, Imran, Hammad, Muhammad, Saeed, Asad, Abbas, Naveed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8982500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35399415
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22863
_version_ 1784681824478298112
author Shahid, Muhammad F
Malik, Asma
Siddiqi, Fuad Ahmad
Fazal, Imran
Hammad, Muhammad
Saeed, Asad
Abbas, Naveed
author_facet Shahid, Muhammad F
Malik, Asma
Siddiqi, Fuad Ahmad
Fazal, Imran
Hammad, Muhammad
Saeed, Asad
Abbas, Naveed
author_sort Shahid, Muhammad F
collection PubMed
description Background and objectives In comparison to real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing, blood-related parameters including absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) carry an indeterminate potential in the assessment of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our main objective was to assess their efficacy in timely identification of COVID-19 patients and to determine whether these biomarkers can be employed as an early diagnostic tool in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19. Methodology This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital in Rawalpindi, Pakistan from November 2020 to March 2021. Patients suspected to have COVID-19 on a clinical basis (fever, cough or shortness of breath) were selected by using convenience non-probability sampling. RT-PCR was used to diagnose COVID-19 after evaluating NLR and ALC of the sample population. An NLR = 3.5 and ALC < 1 x 10(3) cells/mm(3) was considered as the cut-off value. Statistical analysis was conducted via SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Chi-square and independent t-tests were used to correlate various data variables, while p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results Out of the 172 subjects included in the study, the mean age was 40.6 ± 10.0 years, while 51% of individuals were males. Fever was found to be the most prevalent complaint (94%). Double RT-PCR testing showed that 51.2% of the population was RT-PCR positive, having a mean ALC of 1.4 ± 0.9 x 10(3)/mm(3), significantly lower than RT-PCR negative cases (p < 0.001). In addition, NLR was drastically elevated for RT-PCR-positive individuals (p < 0.001) while it also had a distinctly high specificity of 91.7% among COVID-19 patients. Additionally, NLR did not correlate with any of the baseline patient-related parameters (presenting complaint, age, and gender). Conclusion NLR and ALC are potentially efficacious measures for an early diagnosis of COVID-19, and can be possibly utilized for an early diagnosis of COVID-19 suspects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8982500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89825002022-04-07 Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Absolute Lymphocyte Count as Early Diagnostic Tools for Corona Virus Disease 2019 Shahid, Muhammad F Malik, Asma Siddiqi, Fuad Ahmad Fazal, Imran Hammad, Muhammad Saeed, Asad Abbas, Naveed Cureus Internal Medicine Background and objectives In comparison to real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing, blood-related parameters including absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) carry an indeterminate potential in the assessment of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our main objective was to assess their efficacy in timely identification of COVID-19 patients and to determine whether these biomarkers can be employed as an early diagnostic tool in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19. Methodology This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital in Rawalpindi, Pakistan from November 2020 to March 2021. Patients suspected to have COVID-19 on a clinical basis (fever, cough or shortness of breath) were selected by using convenience non-probability sampling. RT-PCR was used to diagnose COVID-19 after evaluating NLR and ALC of the sample population. An NLR = 3.5 and ALC < 1 x 10(3) cells/mm(3) was considered as the cut-off value. Statistical analysis was conducted via SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Chi-square and independent t-tests were used to correlate various data variables, while p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results Out of the 172 subjects included in the study, the mean age was 40.6 ± 10.0 years, while 51% of individuals were males. Fever was found to be the most prevalent complaint (94%). Double RT-PCR testing showed that 51.2% of the population was RT-PCR positive, having a mean ALC of 1.4 ± 0.9 x 10(3)/mm(3), significantly lower than RT-PCR negative cases (p < 0.001). In addition, NLR was drastically elevated for RT-PCR-positive individuals (p < 0.001) while it also had a distinctly high specificity of 91.7% among COVID-19 patients. Additionally, NLR did not correlate with any of the baseline patient-related parameters (presenting complaint, age, and gender). Conclusion NLR and ALC are potentially efficacious measures for an early diagnosis of COVID-19, and can be possibly utilized for an early diagnosis of COVID-19 suspects. Cureus 2022-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8982500/ /pubmed/35399415 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22863 Text en Copyright © 2022, Shahid et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Internal Medicine
Shahid, Muhammad F
Malik, Asma
Siddiqi, Fuad Ahmad
Fazal, Imran
Hammad, Muhammad
Saeed, Asad
Abbas, Naveed
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Absolute Lymphocyte Count as Early Diagnostic Tools for Corona Virus Disease 2019
title Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Absolute Lymphocyte Count as Early Diagnostic Tools for Corona Virus Disease 2019
title_full Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Absolute Lymphocyte Count as Early Diagnostic Tools for Corona Virus Disease 2019
title_fullStr Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Absolute Lymphocyte Count as Early Diagnostic Tools for Corona Virus Disease 2019
title_full_unstemmed Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Absolute Lymphocyte Count as Early Diagnostic Tools for Corona Virus Disease 2019
title_short Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Absolute Lymphocyte Count as Early Diagnostic Tools for Corona Virus Disease 2019
title_sort neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and absolute lymphocyte count as early diagnostic tools for corona virus disease 2019
topic Internal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8982500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35399415
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22863
work_keys_str_mv AT shahidmuhammadf neutrophiltolymphocyteratioandabsolutelymphocytecountasearlydiagnostictoolsforcoronavirusdisease2019
AT malikasma neutrophiltolymphocyteratioandabsolutelymphocytecountasearlydiagnostictoolsforcoronavirusdisease2019
AT siddiqifuadahmad neutrophiltolymphocyteratioandabsolutelymphocytecountasearlydiagnostictoolsforcoronavirusdisease2019
AT fazalimran neutrophiltolymphocyteratioandabsolutelymphocytecountasearlydiagnostictoolsforcoronavirusdisease2019
AT hammadmuhammad neutrophiltolymphocyteratioandabsolutelymphocytecountasearlydiagnostictoolsforcoronavirusdisease2019
AT saeedasad neutrophiltolymphocyteratioandabsolutelymphocytecountasearlydiagnostictoolsforcoronavirusdisease2019
AT abbasnaveed neutrophiltolymphocyteratioandabsolutelymphocytecountasearlydiagnostictoolsforcoronavirusdisease2019