Cargando…

Performance evaluation of a dead-end hollowfiber ultrafiltration method for enumeration of somatic and F+ coliphage from recreational waters

Dead-end hollow fiber ultrafiltration combined with a single agar layer assay (D-HFUF-SAL) has potential use in the assessment of sanitary quality of recreational waters through enumeration of coliphage counts as measures of fecal contamination. However, information on applicability across a broad r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korajkic, Asja, McMinn, Brian R., Herrmann, Michael P., Pemberton, Adin C., Kelleher, Julie, Oshima, Kevin, Villegas, Eric N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8982549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34310974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114245
_version_ 1784681833524363264
author Korajkic, Asja
McMinn, Brian R.
Herrmann, Michael P.
Pemberton, Adin C.
Kelleher, Julie
Oshima, Kevin
Villegas, Eric N.
author_facet Korajkic, Asja
McMinn, Brian R.
Herrmann, Michael P.
Pemberton, Adin C.
Kelleher, Julie
Oshima, Kevin
Villegas, Eric N.
author_sort Korajkic, Asja
collection PubMed
description Dead-end hollow fiber ultrafiltration combined with a single agar layer assay (D-HFUF-SAL) has potential use in the assessment of sanitary quality of recreational waters through enumeration of coliphage counts as measures of fecal contamination. However, information on applicability across a broad range of sites and water types is limited. Here, we tested the performance of D-HFUF-SAL on 49 marine and freshwater samples. Effect of method used to titer the spiking suspension (SAL versus double agar layer [DAL]) on percent recovery was also evaluated. Average somatic coliphage recovery (72 % ± 27) was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) compared to F+ (53 % ± 19). This was more pronounced for marine (p ≤ 0.0001) compared to freshwaters (p = 0.0134). Neither method affected somatic coliphage, but DAL (28 % ± 12) significantly (p < 0.0001) underestimated F + coliphage recoveries compared to SAL (53 % ± 19). Overall, results indicate that, while D-HFUF-SAL performed well over a wide variety of water types, F + coliphage recoveries were significantly reduced for marine waters suggesting that some components unique to this habitat may interfere with the assay performance. More importantly, our findings indicate that choice of spike titer method merits careful consideration since it may under-estimate method percent recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8982549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89825492022-04-05 Performance evaluation of a dead-end hollowfiber ultrafiltration method for enumeration of somatic and F+ coliphage from recreational waters Korajkic, Asja McMinn, Brian R. Herrmann, Michael P. Pemberton, Adin C. Kelleher, Julie Oshima, Kevin Villegas, Eric N. J Virol Methods Article Dead-end hollow fiber ultrafiltration combined with a single agar layer assay (D-HFUF-SAL) has potential use in the assessment of sanitary quality of recreational waters through enumeration of coliphage counts as measures of fecal contamination. However, information on applicability across a broad range of sites and water types is limited. Here, we tested the performance of D-HFUF-SAL on 49 marine and freshwater samples. Effect of method used to titer the spiking suspension (SAL versus double agar layer [DAL]) on percent recovery was also evaluated. Average somatic coliphage recovery (72 % ± 27) was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) compared to F+ (53 % ± 19). This was more pronounced for marine (p ≤ 0.0001) compared to freshwaters (p = 0.0134). Neither method affected somatic coliphage, but DAL (28 % ± 12) significantly (p < 0.0001) underestimated F + coliphage recoveries compared to SAL (53 % ± 19). Overall, results indicate that, while D-HFUF-SAL performed well over a wide variety of water types, F + coliphage recoveries were significantly reduced for marine waters suggesting that some components unique to this habitat may interfere with the assay performance. More importantly, our findings indicate that choice of spike titer method merits careful consideration since it may under-estimate method percent recovery. 2021-10 2021-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8982549/ /pubmed/34310974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114245 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Korajkic, Asja
McMinn, Brian R.
Herrmann, Michael P.
Pemberton, Adin C.
Kelleher, Julie
Oshima, Kevin
Villegas, Eric N.
Performance evaluation of a dead-end hollowfiber ultrafiltration method for enumeration of somatic and F+ coliphage from recreational waters
title Performance evaluation of a dead-end hollowfiber ultrafiltration method for enumeration of somatic and F+ coliphage from recreational waters
title_full Performance evaluation of a dead-end hollowfiber ultrafiltration method for enumeration of somatic and F+ coliphage from recreational waters
title_fullStr Performance evaluation of a dead-end hollowfiber ultrafiltration method for enumeration of somatic and F+ coliphage from recreational waters
title_full_unstemmed Performance evaluation of a dead-end hollowfiber ultrafiltration method for enumeration of somatic and F+ coliphage from recreational waters
title_short Performance evaluation of a dead-end hollowfiber ultrafiltration method for enumeration of somatic and F+ coliphage from recreational waters
title_sort performance evaluation of a dead-end hollowfiber ultrafiltration method for enumeration of somatic and f+ coliphage from recreational waters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8982549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34310974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114245
work_keys_str_mv AT korajkicasja performanceevaluationofadeadendhollowfiberultrafiltrationmethodforenumerationofsomaticandfcoliphagefromrecreationalwaters
AT mcminnbrianr performanceevaluationofadeadendhollowfiberultrafiltrationmethodforenumerationofsomaticandfcoliphagefromrecreationalwaters
AT herrmannmichaelp performanceevaluationofadeadendhollowfiberultrafiltrationmethodforenumerationofsomaticandfcoliphagefromrecreationalwaters
AT pembertonadinc performanceevaluationofadeadendhollowfiberultrafiltrationmethodforenumerationofsomaticandfcoliphagefromrecreationalwaters
AT kelleherjulie performanceevaluationofadeadendhollowfiberultrafiltrationmethodforenumerationofsomaticandfcoliphagefromrecreationalwaters
AT oshimakevin performanceevaluationofadeadendhollowfiberultrafiltrationmethodforenumerationofsomaticandfcoliphagefromrecreationalwaters
AT villegasericn performanceevaluationofadeadendhollowfiberultrafiltrationmethodforenumerationofsomaticandfcoliphagefromrecreationalwaters