Cargando…
Do first and last letters carry more weight in the mechanism behind word familiarity?
Previous research has suggested a role of letter location information in familiarity-detection that occurs with word stimuli, but no studies have yet investigated whether certain letter positions are weighted more heavily in the feature-based mechanism behind word familiarity-detection. Based on psy...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8982651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381911 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02093-1 |
_version_ | 1784681848584011776 |
---|---|
author | Huebert, Andrew M. Cleary, Anne M. |
author_facet | Huebert, Andrew M. Cleary, Anne M. |
author_sort | Huebert, Andrew M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous research has suggested a role of letter location information in familiarity-detection that occurs with word stimuli, but no studies have yet investigated whether certain letter positions are weighted more heavily in the feature-based mechanism behind word familiarity-detection. Based on psycholinguistic research suggesting that first and last letters are weighted more heavily than interior letters when it comes to reading words, we investigated whether first and last letters carry more weight in the mechanism behind word familiarity that results from feature familiarization in a list-learning paradigm. In two experiments, participants studied word fragments (e.g., RA_ _ _ _OP) and later rated the familiarity of complete words (e.g., RAINDROP). We varied whether the first and last or only interior letters were present at study. Participants consistently rated test words whose fragments went unidentified at study as more familiar when the first and last letters had been studied than when only interior letters had been studied. This suggests that first and last letters contribute more strongly to the word familiarity signal than interior letters. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13423-022-02093-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8982651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89826512022-04-06 Do first and last letters carry more weight in the mechanism behind word familiarity? Huebert, Andrew M. Cleary, Anne M. Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report Previous research has suggested a role of letter location information in familiarity-detection that occurs with word stimuli, but no studies have yet investigated whether certain letter positions are weighted more heavily in the feature-based mechanism behind word familiarity-detection. Based on psycholinguistic research suggesting that first and last letters are weighted more heavily than interior letters when it comes to reading words, we investigated whether first and last letters carry more weight in the mechanism behind word familiarity that results from feature familiarization in a list-learning paradigm. In two experiments, participants studied word fragments (e.g., RA_ _ _ _OP) and later rated the familiarity of complete words (e.g., RAINDROP). We varied whether the first and last or only interior letters were present at study. Participants consistently rated test words whose fragments went unidentified at study as more familiar when the first and last letters had been studied than when only interior letters had been studied. This suggests that first and last letters contribute more strongly to the word familiarity signal than interior letters. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13423-022-02093-1. Springer US 2022-04-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8982651/ /pubmed/35381911 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02093-1 Text en © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Huebert, Andrew M. Cleary, Anne M. Do first and last letters carry more weight in the mechanism behind word familiarity? |
title | Do first and last letters carry more weight in the mechanism behind word familiarity? |
title_full | Do first and last letters carry more weight in the mechanism behind word familiarity? |
title_fullStr | Do first and last letters carry more weight in the mechanism behind word familiarity? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do first and last letters carry more weight in the mechanism behind word familiarity? |
title_short | Do first and last letters carry more weight in the mechanism behind word familiarity? |
title_sort | do first and last letters carry more weight in the mechanism behind word familiarity? |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8982651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381911 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02093-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huebertandrewm dofirstandlastletterscarrymoreweightinthemechanismbehindwordfamiliarity AT clearyannem dofirstandlastletterscarrymoreweightinthemechanismbehindwordfamiliarity |