Cargando…

The in-practice prevention programme: an example of flexible commissioning from Yorkshire and the Humber

Introduction An In-Practice Prevention (IPP) programme was developed by the Local Dental Network in the North Yorkshire and the Humber area in England in response to an oral health needs assessment. The underpinning logic model drew on a flexible commissioning approach and aimed to incentivise denta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandom, Fiona, Hearnshaw, Simon, Grant, Siobhan, Williams, Lynne, Brocklehurst, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8982659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4140-y
_version_ 1784681850510245888
author Sandom, Fiona
Hearnshaw, Simon
Grant, Siobhan
Williams, Lynne
Brocklehurst, Paul
author_facet Sandom, Fiona
Hearnshaw, Simon
Grant, Siobhan
Williams, Lynne
Brocklehurst, Paul
author_sort Sandom, Fiona
collection PubMed
description Introduction An In-Practice Prevention (IPP) programme was developed by the Local Dental Network in the North Yorkshire and the Humber area in England in response to an oral health needs assessment. The underpinning logic model drew on a flexible commissioning approach and aimed to incentivise dental teams with NHS contracts to promote the delivery of prevention. This used care pathways that involved the whole dental team and was cost-neutral. Aim The programme was evaluated using realist methodology to identify 'what works, in which circumstances, how and for who?'. Design Realist evaluations are explanatory in nature and attempt to understand the factors that appear to influence the success (or not) of an intervention, rather than demonstrating causality. Methods and results Following a review of the pertinent literature, semi-structured interviews and focus groups, five theory areas were considered to be critical to the delivery of IPP. In order of stated priority, these were: 1) clinical leadership; 2) 'skill mix'; 3) financial incentives; 4) institutional logic/practice culture; and 5) behaviour change. Conclusion The results appear to show that clinically-led programmes could offer value to dental commissioners within a flexible commissioning model, although this would need to be further tested using an experiment design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8982659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89826592022-04-06 The in-practice prevention programme: an example of flexible commissioning from Yorkshire and the Humber Sandom, Fiona Hearnshaw, Simon Grant, Siobhan Williams, Lynne Brocklehurst, Paul Br Dent J Research Introduction An In-Practice Prevention (IPP) programme was developed by the Local Dental Network in the North Yorkshire and the Humber area in England in response to an oral health needs assessment. The underpinning logic model drew on a flexible commissioning approach and aimed to incentivise dental teams with NHS contracts to promote the delivery of prevention. This used care pathways that involved the whole dental team and was cost-neutral. Aim The programme was evaluated using realist methodology to identify 'what works, in which circumstances, how and for who?'. Design Realist evaluations are explanatory in nature and attempt to understand the factors that appear to influence the success (or not) of an intervention, rather than demonstrating causality. Methods and results Following a review of the pertinent literature, semi-structured interviews and focus groups, five theory areas were considered to be critical to the delivery of IPP. In order of stated priority, these were: 1) clinical leadership; 2) 'skill mix'; 3) financial incentives; 4) institutional logic/practice culture; and 5) behaviour change. Conclusion The results appear to show that clinically-led programmes could offer value to dental commissioners within a flexible commissioning model, although this would need to be further tested using an experiment design. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8982659/ /pubmed/35383286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4140-y Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the British Dental Association 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .© The Author(s) 2022
spellingShingle Research
Sandom, Fiona
Hearnshaw, Simon
Grant, Siobhan
Williams, Lynne
Brocklehurst, Paul
The in-practice prevention programme: an example of flexible commissioning from Yorkshire and the Humber
title The in-practice prevention programme: an example of flexible commissioning from Yorkshire and the Humber
title_full The in-practice prevention programme: an example of flexible commissioning from Yorkshire and the Humber
title_fullStr The in-practice prevention programme: an example of flexible commissioning from Yorkshire and the Humber
title_full_unstemmed The in-practice prevention programme: an example of flexible commissioning from Yorkshire and the Humber
title_short The in-practice prevention programme: an example of flexible commissioning from Yorkshire and the Humber
title_sort in-practice prevention programme: an example of flexible commissioning from yorkshire and the humber
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8982659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4140-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sandomfiona theinpracticepreventionprogrammeanexampleofflexiblecommissioningfromyorkshireandthehumber
AT hearnshawsimon theinpracticepreventionprogrammeanexampleofflexiblecommissioningfromyorkshireandthehumber
AT grantsiobhan theinpracticepreventionprogrammeanexampleofflexiblecommissioningfromyorkshireandthehumber
AT williamslynne theinpracticepreventionprogrammeanexampleofflexiblecommissioningfromyorkshireandthehumber
AT brocklehurstpaul theinpracticepreventionprogrammeanexampleofflexiblecommissioningfromyorkshireandthehumber
AT sandomfiona inpracticepreventionprogrammeanexampleofflexiblecommissioningfromyorkshireandthehumber
AT hearnshawsimon inpracticepreventionprogrammeanexampleofflexiblecommissioningfromyorkshireandthehumber
AT grantsiobhan inpracticepreventionprogrammeanexampleofflexiblecommissioningfromyorkshireandthehumber
AT williamslynne inpracticepreventionprogrammeanexampleofflexiblecommissioningfromyorkshireandthehumber
AT brocklehurstpaul inpracticepreventionprogrammeanexampleofflexiblecommissioningfromyorkshireandthehumber