Cargando…
Optical aberrations in three different intraocular lens designs of a same platform
PURPOSE: To compare internal optical aberrations between three different intraocular lenses (IOL) of the same Tecnis platform: monofocal ZCB00, multifocal ZMB00, and enlarged depth-of-focus (EDoF) Symfony ZXR00. METHODS: We included in this study 236 eyes of 118 patients who had been bilaterally imp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8982946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35391809 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.337865 |
_version_ | 1784681892880056320 |
---|---|
author | A. Bartol-Puyal, Francisco d. Giménez, Galadriel Altemir, Irene Larrosa, José M. Polo, Vicente Pablo, Luis |
author_facet | A. Bartol-Puyal, Francisco d. Giménez, Galadriel Altemir, Irene Larrosa, José M. Polo, Vicente Pablo, Luis |
author_sort | A. Bartol-Puyal, Francisco d. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare internal optical aberrations between three different intraocular lenses (IOL) of the same Tecnis platform: monofocal ZCB00, multifocal ZMB00, and enlarged depth-of-focus (EDoF) Symfony ZXR00. METHODS: We included in this study 236 eyes of 118 patients who had been bilaterally implanted either with the monofocal, the multifocal, or the EDoF IOL. They were examined with the K1-RW wavefront analyzer (Topcon Medical Systems) 2 months after surgery. Patients with any ocular pathology were excluded from the study. Only high-order aberrations (HOA) of the third and fourth orders of the Zernike polynomials were considered. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (86 eyes) were implanted with the monofocal IOL, 45 patients (90 eyes) with the ZMB00 IOL, and 30 patients (60 eyes) with the EDoF Symfony IOL. Mean age was 62.42 ± 7.38, 63.60 ± 6.01, and 64.74 ± 5.84 years, respectively. Mean axial length was 23.37 ± 1.00, 23.49 ± 1.00, and 23.54 ± 0.73 mm, respectively. For a 6-mm pupil, internal total HOA in the monofocal group was 1.01 ± 1.75 μm; in the bifocal group was 1.35 ± 2.12 μm; and in the Symfony group was 0.72 ± 0.63 μm. No optical aberration differences were found among the three groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There are no differences regarding internal optical aberrations between these three IOLs when analyzing them with optical aberrometry. Patients’ pupil size should be considered for the selection of the most appropriate IOL to be implanted, because despite a same optical platform, every IOL implies a different increase of HOA with larger pupil sizes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8982946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89829462022-04-06 Optical aberrations in three different intraocular lens designs of a same platform A. Bartol-Puyal, Francisco d. Giménez, Galadriel Altemir, Irene Larrosa, José M. Polo, Vicente Pablo, Luis Saudi J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare internal optical aberrations between three different intraocular lenses (IOL) of the same Tecnis platform: monofocal ZCB00, multifocal ZMB00, and enlarged depth-of-focus (EDoF) Symfony ZXR00. METHODS: We included in this study 236 eyes of 118 patients who had been bilaterally implanted either with the monofocal, the multifocal, or the EDoF IOL. They were examined with the K1-RW wavefront analyzer (Topcon Medical Systems) 2 months after surgery. Patients with any ocular pathology were excluded from the study. Only high-order aberrations (HOA) of the third and fourth orders of the Zernike polynomials were considered. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (86 eyes) were implanted with the monofocal IOL, 45 patients (90 eyes) with the ZMB00 IOL, and 30 patients (60 eyes) with the EDoF Symfony IOL. Mean age was 62.42 ± 7.38, 63.60 ± 6.01, and 64.74 ± 5.84 years, respectively. Mean axial length was 23.37 ± 1.00, 23.49 ± 1.00, and 23.54 ± 0.73 mm, respectively. For a 6-mm pupil, internal total HOA in the monofocal group was 1.01 ± 1.75 μm; in the bifocal group was 1.35 ± 2.12 μm; and in the Symfony group was 0.72 ± 0.63 μm. No optical aberration differences were found among the three groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There are no differences regarding internal optical aberrations between these three IOLs when analyzing them with optical aberrometry. Patients’ pupil size should be considered for the selection of the most appropriate IOL to be implanted, because despite a same optical platform, every IOL implies a different increase of HOA with larger pupil sizes. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8982946/ /pubmed/35391809 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.337865 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article A. Bartol-Puyal, Francisco d. Giménez, Galadriel Altemir, Irene Larrosa, José M. Polo, Vicente Pablo, Luis Optical aberrations in three different intraocular lens designs of a same platform |
title | Optical aberrations in three different intraocular lens designs of a same platform |
title_full | Optical aberrations in three different intraocular lens designs of a same platform |
title_fullStr | Optical aberrations in three different intraocular lens designs of a same platform |
title_full_unstemmed | Optical aberrations in three different intraocular lens designs of a same platform |
title_short | Optical aberrations in three different intraocular lens designs of a same platform |
title_sort | optical aberrations in three different intraocular lens designs of a same platform |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8982946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35391809 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.337865 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abartolpuyalfranciscod opticalaberrationsinthreedifferentintraocularlensdesignsofasameplatform AT gimenezgaladriel opticalaberrationsinthreedifferentintraocularlensdesignsofasameplatform AT altemirirene opticalaberrationsinthreedifferentintraocularlensdesignsofasameplatform AT larrosajosem opticalaberrationsinthreedifferentintraocularlensdesignsofasameplatform AT polovicente opticalaberrationsinthreedifferentintraocularlensdesignsofasameplatform AT pabloluis opticalaberrationsinthreedifferentintraocularlensdesignsofasameplatform |