Cargando…

Robot-assisted radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: A review

BACKGROUND: Radical cholecystectomy (RC) is recommended for Gallbladder cancer (GbC) patients with resectable T1b or higher stage. Traditionally, open RC is preferred over minimally invasive approach. Robotic surgery is increasingly gaining popularity and there are reports of robotic RC (RRC) for Gb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiayi, Weng, Shelat, Vishal G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8983392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35392126
_version_ 1784681972858093568
author Jiayi, Weng
Shelat, Vishal G.
author_facet Jiayi, Weng
Shelat, Vishal G.
author_sort Jiayi, Weng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radical cholecystectomy (RC) is recommended for Gallbladder cancer (GbC) patients with resectable T1b or higher stage. Traditionally, open RC is preferred over minimally invasive approach. Robotic surgery is increasingly gaining popularity and there are reports of robotic RC (RRC) for GbC. RRC is still new and mostly performed in high-volume centers with access to robotic technology. AIM: This study aims to review the current literature on the safety and feasibility of RRC for GbC. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of RRC for GbC using PubMed and Embase until December 2020. The primary endpoint was major complications, while the secondary endpoints were conversion to open, R0 resection, and early recurrence. RESULTS: Seven studies with 74 patients were included in the study. Overall, four patients (5.41%) required open conversion. Five out of 74 patients (6.76%) experienced post-operative complications. There was no post-operative mortality. Among the patients with surgical margins reported (n = 63), 61 patients had negative margins (96.8%) and only two patients had positive margins. Two-year survival outcomes were reported as 60.5–100%. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: This is the first review that summarizes the current evidence on RRC for GbC. The endpoints suggest that RRC is feasible and safe in selected patients and when done in experienced centers. Understanding the strengths and limitations of RRC compared to other established therapeutic options may potentially aid surgeons in formulating the optimal treatment plan for GbC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8983392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89833922022-04-06 Robot-assisted radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: A review Jiayi, Weng Shelat, Vishal G. J Clin Transl Res Review Article BACKGROUND: Radical cholecystectomy (RC) is recommended for Gallbladder cancer (GbC) patients with resectable T1b or higher stage. Traditionally, open RC is preferred over minimally invasive approach. Robotic surgery is increasingly gaining popularity and there are reports of robotic RC (RRC) for GbC. RRC is still new and mostly performed in high-volume centers with access to robotic technology. AIM: This study aims to review the current literature on the safety and feasibility of RRC for GbC. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of RRC for GbC using PubMed and Embase until December 2020. The primary endpoint was major complications, while the secondary endpoints were conversion to open, R0 resection, and early recurrence. RESULTS: Seven studies with 74 patients were included in the study. Overall, four patients (5.41%) required open conversion. Five out of 74 patients (6.76%) experienced post-operative complications. There was no post-operative mortality. Among the patients with surgical margins reported (n = 63), 61 patients had negative margins (96.8%) and only two patients had positive margins. Two-year survival outcomes were reported as 60.5–100%. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: This is the first review that summarizes the current evidence on RRC for GbC. The endpoints suggest that RRC is feasible and safe in selected patients and when done in experienced centers. Understanding the strengths and limitations of RRC compared to other established therapeutic options may potentially aid surgeons in formulating the optimal treatment plan for GbC patients. Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8983392/ /pubmed/35392126 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, permitting all noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Jiayi, Weng
Shelat, Vishal G.
Robot-assisted radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: A review
title Robot-assisted radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: A review
title_full Robot-assisted radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: A review
title_fullStr Robot-assisted radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: A review
title_full_unstemmed Robot-assisted radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: A review
title_short Robot-assisted radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: A review
title_sort robot-assisted radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: a review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8983392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35392126
work_keys_str_mv AT jiayiweng robotassistedradicalcholecystectomyforgallbladdercancerareview
AT shelatvishalg robotassistedradicalcholecystectomyforgallbladdercancerareview