Cargando…

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review

OBJECTIVES: School closures have been used as a core non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims at identifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission in educational settings during the first waves of the pandemic. METHODS: This literature review assessed studies published...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vardavas, Constantine, Nikitara, Katerina, Mathioudakis, Alexander G, Hilton Boon, Michele, Phalkey, Revati, Leonardi-Bee, Jo, Pharris, Anastasia, Deogan, Charlotte, Suk, Jonathan E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8983413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058308
_version_ 1784681976588926976
author Vardavas, Constantine
Nikitara, Katerina
Mathioudakis, Alexander G
Hilton Boon, Michele
Phalkey, Revati
Leonardi-Bee, Jo
Pharris, Anastasia
Deogan, Charlotte
Suk, Jonathan E
author_facet Vardavas, Constantine
Nikitara, Katerina
Mathioudakis, Alexander G
Hilton Boon, Michele
Phalkey, Revati
Leonardi-Bee, Jo
Pharris, Anastasia
Deogan, Charlotte
Suk, Jonathan E
author_sort Vardavas, Constantine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: School closures have been used as a core non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims at identifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission in educational settings during the first waves of the pandemic. METHODS: This literature review assessed studies published between December 2019 and 1 April 2021 in Medline and Embase, which included studies that assessed educational settings from approximately January 2020 to January 2021. The inclusion criteria were based on the PCC framework (P-Population, C-Concept, C-Context). The study Population was restricted to people 1–17 years old (excluding neonatal transmission), the Concept was to assess child-to-child and child-to-adult transmission, while the Context was to assess specifically educational setting transmission. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, ranging from daycare centres to high schools and summer camps, while eight studies assessed the re-opening of schools in the 2020–2021 school year. In principle, although there is sufficient evidence that children can both be infected by and transmit SARS-CoV-2 in school settings, the SAR remain relatively low—when NPI measures are implemented in parallel. Moreover, although the evidence was limited, there was an indication that younger children may have a lower SAR than adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission in educational settings in 2020 was minimal—when NPI measures were implemented in parallel. However, with an upsurge of cases related to variants of concern, continuous surveillance and assessment of the evidence is warranted to ensure the maximum protection of the health of students and the educational workforce, while also minimising the numerous negative impacts that school closures may have on children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8983413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89834132022-04-06 Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review Vardavas, Constantine Nikitara, Katerina Mathioudakis, Alexander G Hilton Boon, Michele Phalkey, Revati Leonardi-Bee, Jo Pharris, Anastasia Deogan, Charlotte Suk, Jonathan E BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVES: School closures have been used as a core non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims at identifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission in educational settings during the first waves of the pandemic. METHODS: This literature review assessed studies published between December 2019 and 1 April 2021 in Medline and Embase, which included studies that assessed educational settings from approximately January 2020 to January 2021. The inclusion criteria were based on the PCC framework (P-Population, C-Concept, C-Context). The study Population was restricted to people 1–17 years old (excluding neonatal transmission), the Concept was to assess child-to-child and child-to-adult transmission, while the Context was to assess specifically educational setting transmission. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, ranging from daycare centres to high schools and summer camps, while eight studies assessed the re-opening of schools in the 2020–2021 school year. In principle, although there is sufficient evidence that children can both be infected by and transmit SARS-CoV-2 in school settings, the SAR remain relatively low—when NPI measures are implemented in parallel. Moreover, although the evidence was limited, there was an indication that younger children may have a lower SAR than adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission in educational settings in 2020 was minimal—when NPI measures were implemented in parallel. However, with an upsurge of cases related to variants of concern, continuous surveillance and assessment of the evidence is warranted to ensure the maximum protection of the health of students and the educational workforce, while also minimising the numerous negative impacts that school closures may have on children. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8983413/ /pubmed/35383084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058308 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Vardavas, Constantine
Nikitara, Katerina
Mathioudakis, Alexander G
Hilton Boon, Michele
Phalkey, Revati
Leonardi-Bee, Jo
Pharris, Anastasia
Deogan, Charlotte
Suk, Jonathan E
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review
title Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review
title_full Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review
title_fullStr Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review
title_full_unstemmed Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review
title_short Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review
title_sort transmission of sars-cov-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8983413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058308
work_keys_str_mv AT vardavasconstantine transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview
AT nikitarakaterina transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview
AT mathioudakisalexanderg transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview
AT hiltonboonmichele transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview
AT phalkeyrevati transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview
AT leonardibeejo transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview
AT pharrisanastasia transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview
AT deogancharlotte transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview
AT sukjonathane transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview