Cargando…
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review
OBJECTIVES: School closures have been used as a core non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims at identifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission in educational settings during the first waves of the pandemic. METHODS: This literature review assessed studies published...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8983413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058308 |
_version_ | 1784681976588926976 |
---|---|
author | Vardavas, Constantine Nikitara, Katerina Mathioudakis, Alexander G Hilton Boon, Michele Phalkey, Revati Leonardi-Bee, Jo Pharris, Anastasia Deogan, Charlotte Suk, Jonathan E |
author_facet | Vardavas, Constantine Nikitara, Katerina Mathioudakis, Alexander G Hilton Boon, Michele Phalkey, Revati Leonardi-Bee, Jo Pharris, Anastasia Deogan, Charlotte Suk, Jonathan E |
author_sort | Vardavas, Constantine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: School closures have been used as a core non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims at identifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission in educational settings during the first waves of the pandemic. METHODS: This literature review assessed studies published between December 2019 and 1 April 2021 in Medline and Embase, which included studies that assessed educational settings from approximately January 2020 to January 2021. The inclusion criteria were based on the PCC framework (P-Population, C-Concept, C-Context). The study Population was restricted to people 1–17 years old (excluding neonatal transmission), the Concept was to assess child-to-child and child-to-adult transmission, while the Context was to assess specifically educational setting transmission. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, ranging from daycare centres to high schools and summer camps, while eight studies assessed the re-opening of schools in the 2020–2021 school year. In principle, although there is sufficient evidence that children can both be infected by and transmit SARS-CoV-2 in school settings, the SAR remain relatively low—when NPI measures are implemented in parallel. Moreover, although the evidence was limited, there was an indication that younger children may have a lower SAR than adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission in educational settings in 2020 was minimal—when NPI measures were implemented in parallel. However, with an upsurge of cases related to variants of concern, continuous surveillance and assessment of the evidence is warranted to ensure the maximum protection of the health of students and the educational workforce, while also minimising the numerous negative impacts that school closures may have on children. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8983413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89834132022-04-06 Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review Vardavas, Constantine Nikitara, Katerina Mathioudakis, Alexander G Hilton Boon, Michele Phalkey, Revati Leonardi-Bee, Jo Pharris, Anastasia Deogan, Charlotte Suk, Jonathan E BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVES: School closures have been used as a core non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims at identifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission in educational settings during the first waves of the pandemic. METHODS: This literature review assessed studies published between December 2019 and 1 April 2021 in Medline and Embase, which included studies that assessed educational settings from approximately January 2020 to January 2021. The inclusion criteria were based on the PCC framework (P-Population, C-Concept, C-Context). The study Population was restricted to people 1–17 years old (excluding neonatal transmission), the Concept was to assess child-to-child and child-to-adult transmission, while the Context was to assess specifically educational setting transmission. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, ranging from daycare centres to high schools and summer camps, while eight studies assessed the re-opening of schools in the 2020–2021 school year. In principle, although there is sufficient evidence that children can both be infected by and transmit SARS-CoV-2 in school settings, the SAR remain relatively low—when NPI measures are implemented in parallel. Moreover, although the evidence was limited, there was an indication that younger children may have a lower SAR than adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission in educational settings in 2020 was minimal—when NPI measures were implemented in parallel. However, with an upsurge of cases related to variants of concern, continuous surveillance and assessment of the evidence is warranted to ensure the maximum protection of the health of students and the educational workforce, while also minimising the numerous negative impacts that school closures may have on children. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8983413/ /pubmed/35383084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058308 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Vardavas, Constantine Nikitara, Katerina Mathioudakis, Alexander G Hilton Boon, Michele Phalkey, Revati Leonardi-Bee, Jo Pharris, Anastasia Deogan, Charlotte Suk, Jonathan E Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review |
title | Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review |
title_full | Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review |
title_fullStr | Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review |
title_full_unstemmed | Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review |
title_short | Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review |
title_sort | transmission of sars-cov-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8983413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058308 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vardavasconstantine transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview AT nikitarakaterina transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview AT mathioudakisalexanderg transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview AT hiltonboonmichele transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview AT phalkeyrevati transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview AT leonardibeejo transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview AT pharrisanastasia transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview AT deogancharlotte transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview AT sukjonathane transmissionofsarscov2ineducationalsettingsin2020areview |