Cargando…
Establishment and Validation of a Novel MRI Radiomics Feature-Based Prognostic Model to Predict Distant Metastasis in Endemic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
PURPOSE: We aimed to establish a prognostic model based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics features for individual distant metastasis risk prediction in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: Regression analysis was applied to select radiomics features from T1-weighted (T1...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8983880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402262 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.794975 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: We aimed to establish a prognostic model based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics features for individual distant metastasis risk prediction in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: Regression analysis was applied to select radiomics features from T1-weighted (T1-w), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1C-w), and T2-weighted (T2-w) MRI scans. All prognostic models were established using a primary cohort of 518 patients with NPC. The prognostic ability of the radiomics, clinical (based on clinical factors), and merged prognostic models (integrating clinical factors with radiomics) were identified using a concordance index (C-index). Models were tested using a validation cohort of 260 NPC patients. Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by using the log-rank test. RESULTS: In the primary cohort, seven radiomics prognostic models showed similar discrimination ability for DMFS to the clinical prognostic model (P=0.070-0.708), while seven merged prognostic models displayed better discrimination ability than the clinical prognostic model or corresponding radiomics prognostic models (all P<0.001). In the validation cohort, the C-indices of seven radiomics prognostic models (0.645-0.722) for DMFS prediction were higher than in the clinical prognostic model (0.552) (P=0.016 or <0.001) or in corresponding merged prognostic models (0.605-0.678) (P=0.297 to 0.857), with T1+T1C prognostic model (based on Radscore combinations of T1 and T1C Radiomics models) showing the highest C-index (0.722). In the decision curve analysis of the validation cohort for all prognostic models, the T1+T1C prognostic model displayed the best performance. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics models, especially the T1+T1C prognostic model, provided better prognostic ability for DMFS in patients with NPC. |
---|