Cargando…
Assessment of hyperprogression versus the natural course of disease development with nivolumab with or without ipilimumab versus placebo in phase III, randomized, controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies have suggested a potential risk of hyperprogressive disease (HPD) in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We compared the incidence of HPD during treatment with nivolumab±ipilimumab versus natural tumor progression with placebo in post hoc analyse...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8983994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-004273 |
_version_ | 1784682082475180032 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Yoon-Koo Reck, Martin Nghiem, Paul Feng, Yan Plautz, Gregory Kim, Hye Ryun Owonikoko, Taofeek K Boku, Narikazu Chen, Li-Tzong Lei, Ming Chang, Han Lin, Wen Hong Roy, Amit Bello, Akintunde Sheng, Jennifer |
author_facet | Kang, Yoon-Koo Reck, Martin Nghiem, Paul Feng, Yan Plautz, Gregory Kim, Hye Ryun Owonikoko, Taofeek K Boku, Narikazu Chen, Li-Tzong Lei, Ming Chang, Han Lin, Wen Hong Roy, Amit Bello, Akintunde Sheng, Jennifer |
author_sort | Kang, Yoon-Koo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies have suggested a potential risk of hyperprogressive disease (HPD) in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We compared the incidence of HPD during treatment with nivolumab±ipilimumab versus natural tumor progression with placebo in post hoc analyses of two randomized, double-blind clinical trials. METHODS: ATTRACTION-2 randomized patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) and progression on ≥2 prior regimens to nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W or placebo. CheckMate 451 randomized patients with extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (ED SCLC) and ongoing complete/partial response or stable disease after first-line chemotherapy to nivolumab 240 mg Q2W, nivolumab 1 mg/kg+ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Q3W for four doses then nivolumab 240 mg Q2W, or placebo. Patients receiving ≥1 dose of study drug and with tumor scans at baseline and the first on-treatment evaluation were included in the HPD analyses. HPD definitions were ≥20%, ≥50%, and ≥100% increase in target lesion sum of the longest diameters (SLD) at the first on-treatment assessment. RESULTS: In the ATTRACTION-2 HPD-evaluable population, 243 patients received nivolumab and 115 placebo. Fewer patients receiving nivolumab versus placebo had increases in SLD ≥20% (33.7% vs 46.1%) and ≥50% (6.2% vs 11.3%); similar proportions had increases in SLD ≥100% (1.6% vs 1.7%). In the CheckMate 451 HPD-evaluable population, 177 patients received nivolumab, 179 nivolumab+ipilimumab, and 175 placebo. Fewer patients receiving nivolumab or nivolumab+ipilimumab versus placebo had increases in SLD ≥20% (27.1%, 27.4% vs 45.7%), ≥50% (10.2%, 11.2% vs 22.3%), and ≥100% (2.8%, 2.8% vs 6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab±ipilimumab was not associated with an increased rate of progression versus placebo in patients with GC, GEJC, or ED SCLC, suggesting that previous reports of HPD may reflect the natural disease course in some patients rather than ICI-mediated progression. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02538666; NCT02267343. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8983994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89839942022-04-22 Assessment of hyperprogression versus the natural course of disease development with nivolumab with or without ipilimumab versus placebo in phase III, randomized, controlled trials Kang, Yoon-Koo Reck, Martin Nghiem, Paul Feng, Yan Plautz, Gregory Kim, Hye Ryun Owonikoko, Taofeek K Boku, Narikazu Chen, Li-Tzong Lei, Ming Chang, Han Lin, Wen Hong Roy, Amit Bello, Akintunde Sheng, Jennifer J Immunother Cancer Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies have suggested a potential risk of hyperprogressive disease (HPD) in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We compared the incidence of HPD during treatment with nivolumab±ipilimumab versus natural tumor progression with placebo in post hoc analyses of two randomized, double-blind clinical trials. METHODS: ATTRACTION-2 randomized patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) and progression on ≥2 prior regimens to nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W or placebo. CheckMate 451 randomized patients with extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (ED SCLC) and ongoing complete/partial response or stable disease after first-line chemotherapy to nivolumab 240 mg Q2W, nivolumab 1 mg/kg+ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Q3W for four doses then nivolumab 240 mg Q2W, or placebo. Patients receiving ≥1 dose of study drug and with tumor scans at baseline and the first on-treatment evaluation were included in the HPD analyses. HPD definitions were ≥20%, ≥50%, and ≥100% increase in target lesion sum of the longest diameters (SLD) at the first on-treatment assessment. RESULTS: In the ATTRACTION-2 HPD-evaluable population, 243 patients received nivolumab and 115 placebo. Fewer patients receiving nivolumab versus placebo had increases in SLD ≥20% (33.7% vs 46.1%) and ≥50% (6.2% vs 11.3%); similar proportions had increases in SLD ≥100% (1.6% vs 1.7%). In the CheckMate 451 HPD-evaluable population, 177 patients received nivolumab, 179 nivolumab+ipilimumab, and 175 placebo. Fewer patients receiving nivolumab or nivolumab+ipilimumab versus placebo had increases in SLD ≥20% (27.1%, 27.4% vs 45.7%), ≥50% (10.2%, 11.2% vs 22.3%), and ≥100% (2.8%, 2.8% vs 6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab±ipilimumab was not associated with an increased rate of progression versus placebo in patients with GC, GEJC, or ED SCLC, suggesting that previous reports of HPD may reflect the natural disease course in some patients rather than ICI-mediated progression. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02538666; NCT02267343. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8983994/ /pubmed/35383114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-004273 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy Kang, Yoon-Koo Reck, Martin Nghiem, Paul Feng, Yan Plautz, Gregory Kim, Hye Ryun Owonikoko, Taofeek K Boku, Narikazu Chen, Li-Tzong Lei, Ming Chang, Han Lin, Wen Hong Roy, Amit Bello, Akintunde Sheng, Jennifer Assessment of hyperprogression versus the natural course of disease development with nivolumab with or without ipilimumab versus placebo in phase III, randomized, controlled trials |
title | Assessment of hyperprogression versus the natural course of disease development with nivolumab with or without ipilimumab versus placebo in phase III, randomized, controlled trials |
title_full | Assessment of hyperprogression versus the natural course of disease development with nivolumab with or without ipilimumab versus placebo in phase III, randomized, controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Assessment of hyperprogression versus the natural course of disease development with nivolumab with or without ipilimumab versus placebo in phase III, randomized, controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of hyperprogression versus the natural course of disease development with nivolumab with or without ipilimumab versus placebo in phase III, randomized, controlled trials |
title_short | Assessment of hyperprogression versus the natural course of disease development with nivolumab with or without ipilimumab versus placebo in phase III, randomized, controlled trials |
title_sort | assessment of hyperprogression versus the natural course of disease development with nivolumab with or without ipilimumab versus placebo in phase iii, randomized, controlled trials |
topic | Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8983994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-004273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangyoonkoo assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials AT reckmartin assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials AT nghiempaul assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials AT fengyan assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials AT plautzgregory assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials AT kimhyeryun assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials AT owonikokotaofeekk assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials AT bokunarikazu assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chenlitzong assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials AT leiming assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials AT changhan assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials AT linwenhong assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials AT royamit assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials AT belloakintunde assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials AT shengjennifer assessmentofhyperprogressionversusthenaturalcourseofdiseasedevelopmentwithnivolumabwithorwithoutipilimumabversusplaceboinphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrials |