Cargando…
Impact of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on team performance and perceived task load: a prospective randomised simulator-based trial
OBJECTIVES: Guidelines recommend family presence to be offered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Data on the effects of family presence on the quality of CPR and rescuers’ workload and stress levels are sparse and conflicting. This randomised trial investigated the effects of family presen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8983997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056798 |
_version_ | 1784682083292020736 |
---|---|
author | Willmes, Mareike Sellmann, Timur Semmer, Norbert Tschan, Franziska Wetzchewald, Dietmar Schwager, Heidrun Russo, S G Marsch, Stephan |
author_facet | Willmes, Mareike Sellmann, Timur Semmer, Norbert Tschan, Franziska Wetzchewald, Dietmar Schwager, Heidrun Russo, S G Marsch, Stephan |
author_sort | Willmes, Mareike |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Guidelines recommend family presence to be offered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Data on the effects of family presence on the quality of CPR and rescuers’ workload and stress levels are sparse and conflicting. This randomised trial investigated the effects of family presence on quality of CPR, and rescuers’ perceived stress. DESIGN: Prospective randomised single-blind trial. SETTING: Voluntary workshops of educational courses. PARTICIPANTS: 1085 physicians (565 men) randomised to 325 teams entered the trial. 318 teams completed the trial without protocol violation. INTERVENTIONS: Teams were randomised to a family presence group (n=160) or a control group (n=158) and to three versions of leadership: (a) designated at random, (b) designated by the team or (c) left open. Thereafter, teams were confronted with a simulated cardiac arrest which was video-recorded. Trained actors played a family member according a scripted role. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was hands-on time. Secondary outcomes included interaction time, rescuers’ perceived task load and adherence to CPR algorithms. RESULTS: Teams interacted with the family member during 24 (17–36) % of the time spent for resuscitation. Family presence had no effect on hands-on time (88% (84%–91%) vs 89% (85%–91%); p=0.18). Family presence increased frustration (60 (30–75) vs 45 (30–70); p<0.001) and perceived temporal (75 (55–85) vs 70 (50–80); p=0.001) and mental demands (75 (60–85) vs 70 (55–80); p=0.009), but had no relevant effect on CPR performance markers. Leadership condition had no effects. CONCLUSIONS: Interacting with a family member occupied about a quarter of the time spent for CPR. While this additional task was associated with an increase in frustration and perceived temporal and mental demands, family presence had no relevant negative effect on the quality of CPR. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00024759. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8983997 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89839972022-04-22 Impact of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on team performance and perceived task load: a prospective randomised simulator-based trial Willmes, Mareike Sellmann, Timur Semmer, Norbert Tschan, Franziska Wetzchewald, Dietmar Schwager, Heidrun Russo, S G Marsch, Stephan BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: Guidelines recommend family presence to be offered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Data on the effects of family presence on the quality of CPR and rescuers’ workload and stress levels are sparse and conflicting. This randomised trial investigated the effects of family presence on quality of CPR, and rescuers’ perceived stress. DESIGN: Prospective randomised single-blind trial. SETTING: Voluntary workshops of educational courses. PARTICIPANTS: 1085 physicians (565 men) randomised to 325 teams entered the trial. 318 teams completed the trial without protocol violation. INTERVENTIONS: Teams were randomised to a family presence group (n=160) or a control group (n=158) and to three versions of leadership: (a) designated at random, (b) designated by the team or (c) left open. Thereafter, teams were confronted with a simulated cardiac arrest which was video-recorded. Trained actors played a family member according a scripted role. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was hands-on time. Secondary outcomes included interaction time, rescuers’ perceived task load and adherence to CPR algorithms. RESULTS: Teams interacted with the family member during 24 (17–36) % of the time spent for resuscitation. Family presence had no effect on hands-on time (88% (84%–91%) vs 89% (85%–91%); p=0.18). Family presence increased frustration (60 (30–75) vs 45 (30–70); p<0.001) and perceived temporal (75 (55–85) vs 70 (50–80); p=0.001) and mental demands (75 (60–85) vs 70 (55–80); p=0.009), but had no relevant effect on CPR performance markers. Leadership condition had no effects. CONCLUSIONS: Interacting with a family member occupied about a quarter of the time spent for CPR. While this additional task was associated with an increase in frustration and perceived temporal and mental demands, family presence had no relevant negative effect on the quality of CPR. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00024759. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8983997/ /pubmed/35383074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056798 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Policy Willmes, Mareike Sellmann, Timur Semmer, Norbert Tschan, Franziska Wetzchewald, Dietmar Schwager, Heidrun Russo, S G Marsch, Stephan Impact of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on team performance and perceived task load: a prospective randomised simulator-based trial |
title | Impact of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on team performance and perceived task load: a prospective randomised simulator-based trial |
title_full | Impact of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on team performance and perceived task load: a prospective randomised simulator-based trial |
title_fullStr | Impact of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on team performance and perceived task load: a prospective randomised simulator-based trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on team performance and perceived task load: a prospective randomised simulator-based trial |
title_short | Impact of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on team performance and perceived task load: a prospective randomised simulator-based trial |
title_sort | impact of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on team performance and perceived task load: a prospective randomised simulator-based trial |
topic | Health Policy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8983997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056798 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT willmesmareike impactoffamilypresenceduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationonteamperformanceandperceivedtaskloadaprospectiverandomisedsimulatorbasedtrial AT sellmanntimur impactoffamilypresenceduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationonteamperformanceandperceivedtaskloadaprospectiverandomisedsimulatorbasedtrial AT semmernorbert impactoffamilypresenceduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationonteamperformanceandperceivedtaskloadaprospectiverandomisedsimulatorbasedtrial AT tschanfranziska impactoffamilypresenceduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationonteamperformanceandperceivedtaskloadaprospectiverandomisedsimulatorbasedtrial AT wetzchewalddietmar impactoffamilypresenceduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationonteamperformanceandperceivedtaskloadaprospectiverandomisedsimulatorbasedtrial AT schwagerheidrun impactoffamilypresenceduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationonteamperformanceandperceivedtaskloadaprospectiverandomisedsimulatorbasedtrial AT russosg impactoffamilypresenceduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationonteamperformanceandperceivedtaskloadaprospectiverandomisedsimulatorbasedtrial AT marschstephan impactoffamilypresenceduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationonteamperformanceandperceivedtaskloadaprospectiverandomisedsimulatorbasedtrial |