Cargando…
Comparison of growth features and cancer stem cell prevalence in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cell lines
AIM OF THE STUDY: Intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (I-CCA and E-CCA respectively) exhibit different growth features that contribute to different clinical outcomes. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) influence tumor growth and thereby may be responsible for these differences. The aim of this study wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8984799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35415255 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ceh.2022.114192 |
_version_ | 1784682259049086976 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Jiaqi Sontag, David P. Burczynski, Frank J. Xi, Shengyan Gong, Yuewen Minuk, Gerald Y. |
author_facet | Yang, Jiaqi Sontag, David P. Burczynski, Frank J. Xi, Shengyan Gong, Yuewen Minuk, Gerald Y. |
author_sort | Yang, Jiaqi |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM OF THE STUDY: Intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (I-CCA and E-CCA respectively) exhibit different growth features that contribute to different clinical outcomes. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) influence tumor growth and thereby may be responsible for these differences. The aim of this study was to document and compare the growth features of human I-CCA and E-CCA cell lines and determine whether any differences observed could be explained by differences in the prevalence and/or stem cell surface marker (SCSM) expression profiles of CSCs within the tumor cell lines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six CCA cells lines, three I-CCA and three E-CCA, were studied. Tumor cell growth features including cell proliferation, colony/spheroid formation, migration and invasion were documented. CSC prevalence and SCSM expression profiles were examined by flow cytometry. RESULTS: I-CCA cells had significantly increased proliferative activity, shorter doubling times and were more invasive than E-CCA cells, while colony/spheroid formation and migration were similar in the two cell populations. There were no significant differences in CSC prevalence rates or SCSM expression profiles. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that I-CCA cells proliferate at a more rapid rate and are more invasive than E-CCA cells but the differences cannot be explained by differences in the prevalence or SCSM expression profiles of CSCs within the tumor cell population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8984799 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89847992022-04-11 Comparison of growth features and cancer stem cell prevalence in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cell lines Yang, Jiaqi Sontag, David P. Burczynski, Frank J. Xi, Shengyan Gong, Yuewen Minuk, Gerald Y. Clin Exp Hepatol Original Paper AIM OF THE STUDY: Intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (I-CCA and E-CCA respectively) exhibit different growth features that contribute to different clinical outcomes. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) influence tumor growth and thereby may be responsible for these differences. The aim of this study was to document and compare the growth features of human I-CCA and E-CCA cell lines and determine whether any differences observed could be explained by differences in the prevalence and/or stem cell surface marker (SCSM) expression profiles of CSCs within the tumor cell lines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six CCA cells lines, three I-CCA and three E-CCA, were studied. Tumor cell growth features including cell proliferation, colony/spheroid formation, migration and invasion were documented. CSC prevalence and SCSM expression profiles were examined by flow cytometry. RESULTS: I-CCA cells had significantly increased proliferative activity, shorter doubling times and were more invasive than E-CCA cells, while colony/spheroid formation and migration were similar in the two cell populations. There were no significant differences in CSC prevalence rates or SCSM expression profiles. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that I-CCA cells proliferate at a more rapid rate and are more invasive than E-CCA cells but the differences cannot be explained by differences in the prevalence or SCSM expression profiles of CSCs within the tumor cell population. Termedia Publishing House 2022-03-23 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8984799/ /pubmed/35415255 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ceh.2022.114192 Text en Copyright © 2022 Clinical and Experimental Hepatology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Yang, Jiaqi Sontag, David P. Burczynski, Frank J. Xi, Shengyan Gong, Yuewen Minuk, Gerald Y. Comparison of growth features and cancer stem cell prevalence in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cell lines |
title | Comparison of growth features and cancer stem cell prevalence in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cell lines |
title_full | Comparison of growth features and cancer stem cell prevalence in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cell lines |
title_fullStr | Comparison of growth features and cancer stem cell prevalence in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cell lines |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of growth features and cancer stem cell prevalence in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cell lines |
title_short | Comparison of growth features and cancer stem cell prevalence in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cell lines |
title_sort | comparison of growth features and cancer stem cell prevalence in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cell lines |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8984799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35415255 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ceh.2022.114192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangjiaqi comparisonofgrowthfeaturesandcancerstemcellprevalenceinintrahepaticandextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomacelllines AT sontagdavidp comparisonofgrowthfeaturesandcancerstemcellprevalenceinintrahepaticandextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomacelllines AT burczynskifrankj comparisonofgrowthfeaturesandcancerstemcellprevalenceinintrahepaticandextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomacelllines AT xishengyan comparisonofgrowthfeaturesandcancerstemcellprevalenceinintrahepaticandextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomacelllines AT gongyuewen comparisonofgrowthfeaturesandcancerstemcellprevalenceinintrahepaticandextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomacelllines AT minukgeraldy comparisonofgrowthfeaturesandcancerstemcellprevalenceinintrahepaticandextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomacelllines |