Cargando…

Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe

Equine herpesvirus‐1 (EHV‐1) can affect the entire equine sector in EU, and the large outbreak reported in 2021 in Spain drew attention to the needs of the European Commission for scientific advice for the assessment of EHV‐1 infection within the framework of Animal Health Law. EHV‐1 is considered e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carvelli, Andrea, Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, Paillot, Romain, Broglia, Alessandro, Kohnle, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35414834
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7230
_version_ 1784682293142487040
author Carvelli, Andrea
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Paillot, Romain
Broglia, Alessandro
Kohnle, Lisa
author_facet Carvelli, Andrea
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Paillot, Romain
Broglia, Alessandro
Kohnle, Lisa
collection PubMed
description Equine herpesvirus‐1 (EHV‐1) can affect the entire equine sector in EU, and the large outbreak reported in 2021 in Spain drew attention to the needs of the European Commission for scientific advice for the assessment of EHV‐1 infection within the framework of Animal Health Law. EHV‐1 is considered endemic in the EU; its main risk is linked to the characteristic of producing latent life‐long infections. These can reactivate producing clinical disease, which can include respiratory, abortive and possibly fatal neurological forms. From the epidemiological and genomic viewpoint, there are no specific neuropathogenic EHV‐1 strains; the respiratory, reproductive and neurological signs are not found to be strain‐specific. This was also the case of the virus that caused the outbreak in Valencia (Spain) in 2021, which was genetically closely related to other viruses circulating before in Europe, and did not present the so‐called neuropathogenic genotype. The outbreak reported in Valencia was followed by wide geographic spread of the virus possibly due to a delay in diagnosis and late application of biosecurity measures. The recommended and most sensitive diagnostic test for detecting EHV‐1 is PCR performed on swabs collected according to the type of clinical signs. Serological assays on paired blood samples can help to detect a recent infection, while no diagnostic methods are available to detect EHV‐1 latent infections. Safe movements of horses can be ensured at premovement phase by testing and issuing health certificates, and by isolating animals upon arrival at new premises with regular health monitoring. In case of suspicion, movements should be forbidden and EHV‐1 infection early detected/confirmed by validated diagnostic tools. During outbreaks, no movements should be allowed until 21 days after the detection of the last case. In general, vaccination against EHV‐1 should be promoted, although this offers limited protection against the neurological form of the disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8985062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89850622022-04-11 Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe Carvelli, Andrea Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Paillot, Romain Broglia, Alessandro Kohnle, Lisa EFSA J Scientific Report Equine herpesvirus‐1 (EHV‐1) can affect the entire equine sector in EU, and the large outbreak reported in 2021 in Spain drew attention to the needs of the European Commission for scientific advice for the assessment of EHV‐1 infection within the framework of Animal Health Law. EHV‐1 is considered endemic in the EU; its main risk is linked to the characteristic of producing latent life‐long infections. These can reactivate producing clinical disease, which can include respiratory, abortive and possibly fatal neurological forms. From the epidemiological and genomic viewpoint, there are no specific neuropathogenic EHV‐1 strains; the respiratory, reproductive and neurological signs are not found to be strain‐specific. This was also the case of the virus that caused the outbreak in Valencia (Spain) in 2021, which was genetically closely related to other viruses circulating before in Europe, and did not present the so‐called neuropathogenic genotype. The outbreak reported in Valencia was followed by wide geographic spread of the virus possibly due to a delay in diagnosis and late application of biosecurity measures. The recommended and most sensitive diagnostic test for detecting EHV‐1 is PCR performed on swabs collected according to the type of clinical signs. Serological assays on paired blood samples can help to detect a recent infection, while no diagnostic methods are available to detect EHV‐1 latent infections. Safe movements of horses can be ensured at premovement phase by testing and issuing health certificates, and by isolating animals upon arrival at new premises with regular health monitoring. In case of suspicion, movements should be forbidden and EHV‐1 infection early detected/confirmed by validated diagnostic tools. During outbreaks, no movements should be allowed until 21 days after the detection of the last case. In general, vaccination against EHV‐1 should be promoted, although this offers limited protection against the neurological form of the disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8985062/ /pubmed/35414834 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7230 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Report
Carvelli, Andrea
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Paillot, Romain
Broglia, Alessandro
Kohnle, Lisa
Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe
title Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe
title_full Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe
title_fullStr Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe
title_short Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe
title_sort clinical impact, diagnosis and control of equine herpesvirus‐1 infection in europe
topic Scientific Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35414834
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7230
work_keys_str_mv AT clinicalimpactdiagnosisandcontrolofequineherpesvirus1infectionineurope
AT carvelliandrea clinicalimpactdiagnosisandcontrolofequineherpesvirus1infectionineurope
AT nielsensørensaxmose clinicalimpactdiagnosisandcontrolofequineherpesvirus1infectionineurope
AT paillotromain clinicalimpactdiagnosisandcontrolofequineherpesvirus1infectionineurope
AT brogliaalessandro clinicalimpactdiagnosisandcontrolofequineherpesvirus1infectionineurope
AT kohnlelisa clinicalimpactdiagnosisandcontrolofequineherpesvirus1infectionineurope