Cargando…
Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe
Equine herpesvirus‐1 (EHV‐1) can affect the entire equine sector in EU, and the large outbreak reported in 2021 in Spain drew attention to the needs of the European Commission for scientific advice for the assessment of EHV‐1 infection within the framework of Animal Health Law. EHV‐1 is considered e...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35414834 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7230 |
_version_ | 1784682293142487040 |
---|---|
author | Carvelli, Andrea Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Paillot, Romain Broglia, Alessandro Kohnle, Lisa |
author_facet | Carvelli, Andrea Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Paillot, Romain Broglia, Alessandro Kohnle, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Equine herpesvirus‐1 (EHV‐1) can affect the entire equine sector in EU, and the large outbreak reported in 2021 in Spain drew attention to the needs of the European Commission for scientific advice for the assessment of EHV‐1 infection within the framework of Animal Health Law. EHV‐1 is considered endemic in the EU; its main risk is linked to the characteristic of producing latent life‐long infections. These can reactivate producing clinical disease, which can include respiratory, abortive and possibly fatal neurological forms. From the epidemiological and genomic viewpoint, there are no specific neuropathogenic EHV‐1 strains; the respiratory, reproductive and neurological signs are not found to be strain‐specific. This was also the case of the virus that caused the outbreak in Valencia (Spain) in 2021, which was genetically closely related to other viruses circulating before in Europe, and did not present the so‐called neuropathogenic genotype. The outbreak reported in Valencia was followed by wide geographic spread of the virus possibly due to a delay in diagnosis and late application of biosecurity measures. The recommended and most sensitive diagnostic test for detecting EHV‐1 is PCR performed on swabs collected according to the type of clinical signs. Serological assays on paired blood samples can help to detect a recent infection, while no diagnostic methods are available to detect EHV‐1 latent infections. Safe movements of horses can be ensured at premovement phase by testing and issuing health certificates, and by isolating animals upon arrival at new premises with regular health monitoring. In case of suspicion, movements should be forbidden and EHV‐1 infection early detected/confirmed by validated diagnostic tools. During outbreaks, no movements should be allowed until 21 days after the detection of the last case. In general, vaccination against EHV‐1 should be promoted, although this offers limited protection against the neurological form of the disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8985062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89850622022-04-11 Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe Carvelli, Andrea Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Paillot, Romain Broglia, Alessandro Kohnle, Lisa EFSA J Scientific Report Equine herpesvirus‐1 (EHV‐1) can affect the entire equine sector in EU, and the large outbreak reported in 2021 in Spain drew attention to the needs of the European Commission for scientific advice for the assessment of EHV‐1 infection within the framework of Animal Health Law. EHV‐1 is considered endemic in the EU; its main risk is linked to the characteristic of producing latent life‐long infections. These can reactivate producing clinical disease, which can include respiratory, abortive and possibly fatal neurological forms. From the epidemiological and genomic viewpoint, there are no specific neuropathogenic EHV‐1 strains; the respiratory, reproductive and neurological signs are not found to be strain‐specific. This was also the case of the virus that caused the outbreak in Valencia (Spain) in 2021, which was genetically closely related to other viruses circulating before in Europe, and did not present the so‐called neuropathogenic genotype. The outbreak reported in Valencia was followed by wide geographic spread of the virus possibly due to a delay in diagnosis and late application of biosecurity measures. The recommended and most sensitive diagnostic test for detecting EHV‐1 is PCR performed on swabs collected according to the type of clinical signs. Serological assays on paired blood samples can help to detect a recent infection, while no diagnostic methods are available to detect EHV‐1 latent infections. Safe movements of horses can be ensured at premovement phase by testing and issuing health certificates, and by isolating animals upon arrival at new premises with regular health monitoring. In case of suspicion, movements should be forbidden and EHV‐1 infection early detected/confirmed by validated diagnostic tools. During outbreaks, no movements should be allowed until 21 days after the detection of the last case. In general, vaccination against EHV‐1 should be promoted, although this offers limited protection against the neurological form of the disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8985062/ /pubmed/35414834 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7230 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Report Carvelli, Andrea Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Paillot, Romain Broglia, Alessandro Kohnle, Lisa Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe |
title | Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe |
title_full | Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe |
title_fullStr | Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe |
title_short | Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus‐1 infection in Europe |
title_sort | clinical impact, diagnosis and control of equine herpesvirus‐1 infection in europe |
topic | Scientific Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35414834 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7230 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clinicalimpactdiagnosisandcontrolofequineherpesvirus1infectionineurope AT carvelliandrea clinicalimpactdiagnosisandcontrolofequineherpesvirus1infectionineurope AT nielsensørensaxmose clinicalimpactdiagnosisandcontrolofequineherpesvirus1infectionineurope AT paillotromain clinicalimpactdiagnosisandcontrolofequineherpesvirus1infectionineurope AT brogliaalessandro clinicalimpactdiagnosisandcontrolofequineherpesvirus1infectionineurope AT kohnlelisa clinicalimpactdiagnosisandcontrolofequineherpesvirus1infectionineurope |