Cargando…
Molecularly resolved, label-free nucleic acid sensing at solid–liquid interface using non-ionic DNA analogues
Nucleic acid-based biosensors, where the capture probe is a nucleic acid, e.g., DNA or its synthetic analogue xeno nucleic acid (XNA), offer interesting ways of eliciting clinically relevant information from hybridization/dehybridization signals. In this respect, the application of XNA probes is att...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society of Chemistry
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35424880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra00386d |
_version_ | 1784682317199966208 |
---|---|
author | Mana, Tanushree Kundu, Jayanta Lahiri, Hiya Bera, Sudipta Kolay, Jayeeta Sinha, Surajit Mukhopadhyay, Rupa |
author_facet | Mana, Tanushree Kundu, Jayanta Lahiri, Hiya Bera, Sudipta Kolay, Jayeeta Sinha, Surajit Mukhopadhyay, Rupa |
author_sort | Mana, Tanushree |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nucleic acid-based biosensors, where the capture probe is a nucleic acid, e.g., DNA or its synthetic analogue xeno nucleic acid (XNA), offer interesting ways of eliciting clinically relevant information from hybridization/dehybridization signals. In this respect, the application of XNA probes is attractive since the drawbacks of DNA probes might be overcome. Within the XNA probe repertoire, peptide nucleic acid (PNA) and morpholino (MO) are promising since their backbones are non-ionic. Therefore, in the absence of electrostatic charge repulsion between the capture probe and the target nucleic acid, a stable duplex can be formed. In addition, these are nuclease-resistant probes. Herein, we have tested the molecularly resolved nucleic acid sensing capacity of PNA and MO capture probes using a fluorescent label-free single molecule force spectroscopy approach. As far as single nucleobase mismatch discrimination is concerned, both PNA and MO performed better than DNA, while the performance of the MO probe was the best. We propose that the conformationally more rigid backbone of MO, compared to the conformationally flexible PNA, is an advantage for MO, since the probe orientation can be made more upright on the surface and therefore MO can be more effectively accessed by the target sequences. The performance of the XNA probes has been compared to that of the DNA probe, using fixed nucleobase sequences, so that the effect of backbone variation could be investigated. To our knowledge, this is the first report on molecularly resolved nucleic acid sensing by non-ionic capture probes, here, MO and PNA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8985177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society of Chemistry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89851772022-04-13 Molecularly resolved, label-free nucleic acid sensing at solid–liquid interface using non-ionic DNA analogues Mana, Tanushree Kundu, Jayanta Lahiri, Hiya Bera, Sudipta Kolay, Jayeeta Sinha, Surajit Mukhopadhyay, Rupa RSC Adv Chemistry Nucleic acid-based biosensors, where the capture probe is a nucleic acid, e.g., DNA or its synthetic analogue xeno nucleic acid (XNA), offer interesting ways of eliciting clinically relevant information from hybridization/dehybridization signals. In this respect, the application of XNA probes is attractive since the drawbacks of DNA probes might be overcome. Within the XNA probe repertoire, peptide nucleic acid (PNA) and morpholino (MO) are promising since their backbones are non-ionic. Therefore, in the absence of electrostatic charge repulsion between the capture probe and the target nucleic acid, a stable duplex can be formed. In addition, these are nuclease-resistant probes. Herein, we have tested the molecularly resolved nucleic acid sensing capacity of PNA and MO capture probes using a fluorescent label-free single molecule force spectroscopy approach. As far as single nucleobase mismatch discrimination is concerned, both PNA and MO performed better than DNA, while the performance of the MO probe was the best. We propose that the conformationally more rigid backbone of MO, compared to the conformationally flexible PNA, is an advantage for MO, since the probe orientation can be made more upright on the surface and therefore MO can be more effectively accessed by the target sequences. The performance of the XNA probes has been compared to that of the DNA probe, using fixed nucleobase sequences, so that the effect of backbone variation could be investigated. To our knowledge, this is the first report on molecularly resolved nucleic acid sensing by non-ionic capture probes, here, MO and PNA. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8985177/ /pubmed/35424880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra00386d Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Chemistry Mana, Tanushree Kundu, Jayanta Lahiri, Hiya Bera, Sudipta Kolay, Jayeeta Sinha, Surajit Mukhopadhyay, Rupa Molecularly resolved, label-free nucleic acid sensing at solid–liquid interface using non-ionic DNA analogues |
title | Molecularly resolved, label-free nucleic acid sensing at solid–liquid interface using non-ionic DNA analogues |
title_full | Molecularly resolved, label-free nucleic acid sensing at solid–liquid interface using non-ionic DNA analogues |
title_fullStr | Molecularly resolved, label-free nucleic acid sensing at solid–liquid interface using non-ionic DNA analogues |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecularly resolved, label-free nucleic acid sensing at solid–liquid interface using non-ionic DNA analogues |
title_short | Molecularly resolved, label-free nucleic acid sensing at solid–liquid interface using non-ionic DNA analogues |
title_sort | molecularly resolved, label-free nucleic acid sensing at solid–liquid interface using non-ionic dna analogues |
topic | Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35424880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra00386d |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manatanushree molecularlyresolvedlabelfreenucleicacidsensingatsolidliquidinterfaceusingnonionicdnaanalogues AT kundujayanta molecularlyresolvedlabelfreenucleicacidsensingatsolidliquidinterfaceusingnonionicdnaanalogues AT lahirihiya molecularlyresolvedlabelfreenucleicacidsensingatsolidliquidinterfaceusingnonionicdnaanalogues AT berasudipta molecularlyresolvedlabelfreenucleicacidsensingatsolidliquidinterfaceusingnonionicdnaanalogues AT kolayjayeeta molecularlyresolvedlabelfreenucleicacidsensingatsolidliquidinterfaceusingnonionicdnaanalogues AT sinhasurajit molecularlyresolvedlabelfreenucleicacidsensingatsolidliquidinterfaceusingnonionicdnaanalogues AT mukhopadhyayrupa molecularlyresolvedlabelfreenucleicacidsensingatsolidliquidinterfaceusingnonionicdnaanalogues |