Cargando…

The Use of a Low-Fidelity Simulator to Improve Vascular Anastomosis Skills of Residents during the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND: To evaluate a workshop using a low-fidelity simulator for training vascular surgery residents in vascular anastomosis during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, single-center. METHODS: Vascular surgery residents at the São Paulo University Medical School were enrolled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torres, Inez Ohashi, Becari, Alice, de Paula Maroni Escudeiro, Gabriel, de Carvalho, João Pedro Lins Mendes, Simão da Silva, Erasmo, Puech-Leão, Pedro, De Luccia, Nelson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35398200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2022.03.032
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To evaluate a workshop using a low-fidelity simulator for training vascular surgery residents in vascular anastomosis during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, single-center. METHODS: Vascular surgery residents at the São Paulo University Medical School were enrolled in the COVID Group (five post graduation year 3 residents) or Control Group (five PGY-4 residents). The COVID Group was trained via a vascular anastomosis workshop. The residents were evaluated using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS), Final Product Analysis and time to perform the procedure. The number of anastomoses performed by the residents were calculated. Data were subjected to statistical analysis, and P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the number of vascular anastomoses performed by the residents between the COVID group and the control group (mean 22.6 ± 7.76 vs. 35.2 ± 3.9, P = 0.01, Student's t-test). Before the workshop, 80% of the residents from the COVID group failed to perform a vascular anastomosis on the simulator. During the workshop, there was improvement in the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) score (initial: 16.5, interquartile range (IQR) 0, under supervision: 25, IQR 5, and at the end of the workshop: 26.5, IQR 2.5; P = 0.049, Friedman's test) and in the Final Product Analysis (initial: 14.5, IQR 6, under supervision: 26.5, IQR 4.625, end of the workshop: 27, IQR 4, P = 0.049, Friedman's test). Time was not significantly different (initial: 35.6, IQR 2.77; under supervision: 25.8 min, IQR 4.53; P = 0.07, Friedman's test). The residents' technical scores were stable 6 months after the training, and there was no difference between their final scores and those of the control group. The residents from the COVID Group reported an improvement in their knowledge, technical skills and confidence after the workshop. CONCLUSIONS: A workshop using a low-fidelity simulator improved vascular surgery residents’ skills and confidence in vascular anastomosis during the pandemic year, when they performed fewer surgical procedures.