Cargando…
FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if radiomics with machine learning can differentiate between F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid breast cancer metastatic lymphadenopathy and FDG-avid COVID-19 mRNA vaccine–related axillary lymphadenopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed FDG-positive, patho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35385985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08725-3 |
_version_ | 1784682386484625408 |
---|---|
author | Eifer, Michal Pinian, Hodaya Klang, Eyal Alhoubani, Yousef Kanana, Nayroz Tau, Noam Davidson, Tima Konen, Eli Catalano, Onofrio A. Eshet, Yael Domachevsky, Liran |
author_facet | Eifer, Michal Pinian, Hodaya Klang, Eyal Alhoubani, Yousef Kanana, Nayroz Tau, Noam Davidson, Tima Konen, Eli Catalano, Onofrio A. Eshet, Yael Domachevsky, Liran |
author_sort | Eifer, Michal |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if radiomics with machine learning can differentiate between F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid breast cancer metastatic lymphadenopathy and FDG-avid COVID-19 mRNA vaccine–related axillary lymphadenopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed FDG-positive, pathology-proven, metastatic axillary lymph nodes in 53 breast cancer patients who had PET/CT for follow-up or staging, and FDG-positive axillary lymph nodes in 46 patients who were vaccinated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Radiomics features (110 features classified into 7 groups) were extracted from all segmented lymph nodes. Analysis was performed on PET, CT, and combined PET/CT inputs. Lymph nodes were randomly assigned to a training (n = 132) and validation cohort (n = 33) by 5-fold cross-validation. K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and random forest (RF) machine learning models were used. Performance was evaluated using an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) score. RESULTS: Axillary lymph nodes from breast cancer patients (n = 85) and COVID-19-vaccinated individuals (n = 80) were analyzed. Analysis of first-order features showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in all combined PET/CT features, most PET features, and half of the CT features. The KNN model showed the best performance score for combined PET/CT and PET input with 0.98 (± 0.03) and 0.88 (± 0.07) validation AUC, and 96% (± 4%) and 85% (± 9%) validation accuracy, respectively. The RF model showed the best result for CT input with 0.96 (± 0.04) validation AUC and 90% (± 6%) validation accuracy. CONCLUSION: Radiomics features can differentiate between FDG-avid breast cancer metastatic and FDG-avid COVID-19 vaccine–related axillary lymphadenopathy. Such a model may have a role in differentiating benign nodes from malignant ones. KEY POINTS: • Patients who were vaccinated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine have shown FDG-avid reactive axillary lymph nodes in PET-CT scans. • We evaluated if radiomics and machine learning can distinguish between FDG-avid metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy in breast cancer patients and FDG-avid reactive axillary lymph nodes. • Combined PET and CT radiomics data showed good test AUC (0.98) for distinguishing between metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy and post-COVID-19 vaccine–associated axillary lymphadenopathy. Therefore, the use of radiomics may have a role in differentiating between benign from malignant FDG-avid nodes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8985565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89855652022-04-06 FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study Eifer, Michal Pinian, Hodaya Klang, Eyal Alhoubani, Yousef Kanana, Nayroz Tau, Noam Davidson, Tima Konen, Eli Catalano, Onofrio A. Eshet, Yael Domachevsky, Liran Eur Radiol Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if radiomics with machine learning can differentiate between F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid breast cancer metastatic lymphadenopathy and FDG-avid COVID-19 mRNA vaccine–related axillary lymphadenopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed FDG-positive, pathology-proven, metastatic axillary lymph nodes in 53 breast cancer patients who had PET/CT for follow-up or staging, and FDG-positive axillary lymph nodes in 46 patients who were vaccinated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Radiomics features (110 features classified into 7 groups) were extracted from all segmented lymph nodes. Analysis was performed on PET, CT, and combined PET/CT inputs. Lymph nodes were randomly assigned to a training (n = 132) and validation cohort (n = 33) by 5-fold cross-validation. K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and random forest (RF) machine learning models were used. Performance was evaluated using an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) score. RESULTS: Axillary lymph nodes from breast cancer patients (n = 85) and COVID-19-vaccinated individuals (n = 80) were analyzed. Analysis of first-order features showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in all combined PET/CT features, most PET features, and half of the CT features. The KNN model showed the best performance score for combined PET/CT and PET input with 0.98 (± 0.03) and 0.88 (± 0.07) validation AUC, and 96% (± 4%) and 85% (± 9%) validation accuracy, respectively. The RF model showed the best result for CT input with 0.96 (± 0.04) validation AUC and 90% (± 6%) validation accuracy. CONCLUSION: Radiomics features can differentiate between FDG-avid breast cancer metastatic and FDG-avid COVID-19 vaccine–related axillary lymphadenopathy. Such a model may have a role in differentiating benign nodes from malignant ones. KEY POINTS: • Patients who were vaccinated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine have shown FDG-avid reactive axillary lymph nodes in PET-CT scans. • We evaluated if radiomics and machine learning can distinguish between FDG-avid metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy in breast cancer patients and FDG-avid reactive axillary lymph nodes. • Combined PET and CT radiomics data showed good test AUC (0.98) for distinguishing between metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy and post-COVID-19 vaccine–associated axillary lymphadenopathy. Therefore, the use of radiomics may have a role in differentiating between benign from malignant FDG-avid nodes. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8985565/ /pubmed/35385985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08725-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence Eifer, Michal Pinian, Hodaya Klang, Eyal Alhoubani, Yousef Kanana, Nayroz Tau, Noam Davidson, Tima Konen, Eli Catalano, Onofrio A. Eshet, Yael Domachevsky, Liran FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study |
title | FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study |
title_full | FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study |
title_fullStr | FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study |
title_short | FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study |
title_sort | fdg pet/ct radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following covid-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study |
topic | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35385985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08725-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eifermichal fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy AT pinianhodaya fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy AT klangeyal fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy AT alhoubaniyousef fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy AT kanananayroz fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy AT taunoam fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy AT davidsontima fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy AT koneneli fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy AT catalanoonofrioa fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy AT eshetyael fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy AT domachevskyliran fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy |