Cargando…

FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if radiomics with machine learning can differentiate between F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid breast cancer metastatic lymphadenopathy and FDG-avid COVID-19 mRNA vaccine–related axillary lymphadenopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed FDG-positive, patho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eifer, Michal, Pinian, Hodaya, Klang, Eyal, Alhoubani, Yousef, Kanana, Nayroz, Tau, Noam, Davidson, Tima, Konen, Eli, Catalano, Onofrio A., Eshet, Yael, Domachevsky, Liran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35385985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08725-3
_version_ 1784682386484625408
author Eifer, Michal
Pinian, Hodaya
Klang, Eyal
Alhoubani, Yousef
Kanana, Nayroz
Tau, Noam
Davidson, Tima
Konen, Eli
Catalano, Onofrio A.
Eshet, Yael
Domachevsky, Liran
author_facet Eifer, Michal
Pinian, Hodaya
Klang, Eyal
Alhoubani, Yousef
Kanana, Nayroz
Tau, Noam
Davidson, Tima
Konen, Eli
Catalano, Onofrio A.
Eshet, Yael
Domachevsky, Liran
author_sort Eifer, Michal
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if radiomics with machine learning can differentiate between F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid breast cancer metastatic lymphadenopathy and FDG-avid COVID-19 mRNA vaccine–related axillary lymphadenopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed FDG-positive, pathology-proven, metastatic axillary lymph nodes in 53 breast cancer patients who had PET/CT for follow-up or staging, and FDG-positive axillary lymph nodes in 46 patients who were vaccinated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Radiomics features (110 features classified into 7 groups) were extracted from all segmented lymph nodes. Analysis was performed on PET, CT, and combined PET/CT inputs. Lymph nodes were randomly assigned to a training (n = 132) and validation cohort (n = 33) by 5-fold cross-validation. K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and random forest (RF) machine learning models were used. Performance was evaluated using an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) score. RESULTS: Axillary lymph nodes from breast cancer patients (n = 85) and COVID-19-vaccinated individuals (n = 80) were analyzed. Analysis of first-order features showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in all combined PET/CT features, most PET features, and half of the CT features. The KNN model showed the best performance score for combined PET/CT and PET input with 0.98 (± 0.03) and 0.88 (± 0.07) validation AUC, and 96% (± 4%) and 85% (± 9%) validation accuracy, respectively. The RF model showed the best result for CT input with 0.96 (± 0.04) validation AUC and 90% (± 6%) validation accuracy. CONCLUSION: Radiomics features can differentiate between FDG-avid breast cancer metastatic and FDG-avid COVID-19 vaccine–related axillary lymphadenopathy. Such a model may have a role in differentiating benign nodes from malignant ones. KEY POINTS: • Patients who were vaccinated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine have shown FDG-avid reactive axillary lymph nodes in PET-CT scans. • We evaluated if radiomics and machine learning can distinguish between FDG-avid metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy in breast cancer patients and FDG-avid reactive axillary lymph nodes. • Combined PET and CT radiomics data showed good test AUC (0.98) for distinguishing between metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy and post-COVID-19 vaccine–associated axillary lymphadenopathy. Therefore, the use of radiomics may have a role in differentiating between benign from malignant FDG-avid nodes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8985565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89855652022-04-06 FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study Eifer, Michal Pinian, Hodaya Klang, Eyal Alhoubani, Yousef Kanana, Nayroz Tau, Noam Davidson, Tima Konen, Eli Catalano, Onofrio A. Eshet, Yael Domachevsky, Liran Eur Radiol Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if radiomics with machine learning can differentiate between F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid breast cancer metastatic lymphadenopathy and FDG-avid COVID-19 mRNA vaccine–related axillary lymphadenopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed FDG-positive, pathology-proven, metastatic axillary lymph nodes in 53 breast cancer patients who had PET/CT for follow-up or staging, and FDG-positive axillary lymph nodes in 46 patients who were vaccinated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Radiomics features (110 features classified into 7 groups) were extracted from all segmented lymph nodes. Analysis was performed on PET, CT, and combined PET/CT inputs. Lymph nodes were randomly assigned to a training (n = 132) and validation cohort (n = 33) by 5-fold cross-validation. K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and random forest (RF) machine learning models were used. Performance was evaluated using an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) score. RESULTS: Axillary lymph nodes from breast cancer patients (n = 85) and COVID-19-vaccinated individuals (n = 80) were analyzed. Analysis of first-order features showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in all combined PET/CT features, most PET features, and half of the CT features. The KNN model showed the best performance score for combined PET/CT and PET input with 0.98 (± 0.03) and 0.88 (± 0.07) validation AUC, and 96% (± 4%) and 85% (± 9%) validation accuracy, respectively. The RF model showed the best result for CT input with 0.96 (± 0.04) validation AUC and 90% (± 6%) validation accuracy. CONCLUSION: Radiomics features can differentiate between FDG-avid breast cancer metastatic and FDG-avid COVID-19 vaccine–related axillary lymphadenopathy. Such a model may have a role in differentiating benign nodes from malignant ones. KEY POINTS: • Patients who were vaccinated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine have shown FDG-avid reactive axillary lymph nodes in PET-CT scans. • We evaluated if radiomics and machine learning can distinguish between FDG-avid metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy in breast cancer patients and FDG-avid reactive axillary lymph nodes. • Combined PET and CT radiomics data showed good test AUC (0.98) for distinguishing between metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy and post-COVID-19 vaccine–associated axillary lymphadenopathy. Therefore, the use of radiomics may have a role in differentiating between benign from malignant FDG-avid nodes. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8985565/ /pubmed/35385985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08725-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence
Eifer, Michal
Pinian, Hodaya
Klang, Eyal
Alhoubani, Yousef
Kanana, Nayroz
Tau, Noam
Davidson, Tima
Konen, Eli
Catalano, Onofrio A.
Eshet, Yael
Domachevsky, Liran
FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study
title FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study
title_full FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study
title_fullStr FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study
title_short FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study
title_sort fdg pet/ct radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following covid-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study
topic Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35385985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08725-3
work_keys_str_mv AT eifermichal fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy
AT pinianhodaya fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy
AT klangeyal fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy
AT alhoubaniyousef fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy
AT kanananayroz fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy
AT taunoam fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy
AT davidsontima fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy
AT koneneli fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy
AT catalanoonofrioa fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy
AT eshetyael fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy
AT domachevskyliran fdgpetctradiomicsasatooltodifferentiatebetweenreactiveaxillarylymphadenopathyfollowingcovid19vaccinationandmetastaticbreastcanceraxillarylymphadenopathyapilotstudy