Does Laparoscopic Adhesiolysis Reduce the Risk of Small Bowel Obstruction Related Readmissions and Reoperations Compared to Open Adhesiolysis?

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in decreasing recurrent episodes of small bowel obstruction (SBO) compared to that of the conventional open procedure. METHODS: Among 373 patients who visited our emergency department from January 2000 to July 2018 due to small bowel obstruction, 67 patients who underwent adhesiolysis were included in this study. Eighteen and 49 patients comprised the open adhesiolysis (OA) and laparoscopic adhesiolysis (LA) groups, respectively. Clinical demographics, computed tomography (CT) findings, laboratory results, and perioperative outcomes were compared. Further, the long-term follow-ups of SBO related re-admissions and re-operations were also compared. RESULTS: Preoperative baseline data, pain characteristics, laboratory findings, and ileus-related CT findings showed no significant difference between the two groups. LA was related to less blood loss and complications, along with early bowel movement recovery. Similarly, fewer SBO-related re-admissions [OA vs. LA=8 (44.4%) vs. 3 (6.1%), p=0.001] and re-operations [OA vs. LA=3 (16.7%) vs. 1 (2.0%), p=0.025] were observed in LA compared to OA. CONCLUSION: LA is a safer and more feasible procedure for SBO treatment compared to OA. This procedure showed a reduction in SBO-related re-admission and re-operation rates.