Cargando…

First application of 3D design custom-made uncemented prosthetic stem for distal femoral cemented megaprosthesis revision

OBJECTIVES: 3D design, which is widely used in orthopedics, can be applied for precise distal femoral megaprosthetic revision. This research aimed to present and evaluate the design, perioperative management, and mid-term clinical outcomes of a 3D design custom-made uncemented prosthetic stem. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Min, Li, Yao, Kai, Lu, Minxun, Zhou, Yong, Wang, Jie, Tang, Fan, Zhang, Wenli, Luo, Yi, Duan, Hong, Tu, Chongqi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35693199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcmedi/pby008
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: 3D design, which is widely used in orthopedics, can be applied for precise distal femoral megaprosthetic revision. This research aimed to present and evaluate the design, perioperative management, and mid-term clinical outcomes of a 3D design custom-made uncemented prosthetic stem. METHODS: Between January 2014 and January 2016, seven patients received 3D design custom-made uncemented prosthetic stem revision at our institution. Clinical records and radiographs were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: There were no hardware-related complications during the follow-up (average 24.3 months; range 24–48 months). The average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score at the last follow-up after revision (27.7 points, range 25–28 points) was significantly higher than that before (16.0 points, range 13–18 points). In addition, the range of motion (ROM) of the affected knee, and the scores of pain, function, emotional acceptance, support, walking and gait all improved significantly. The antecurvature radian of the revision stem averaged at 3.6°. Of the seven patients, three received femoral stem revision and four received revision of the femoral stem and the femoral component; three of them used longer prostheses than the others. There were no significant differences in function between these two groups at the last follow-up after revision. CONCLUSION: The 3D design custom-made prosthesis is a typical precision medicine technology in oncologic orthopedics. Characterized by its individually and precisely designed uncemented stem, it offers an alternative option for distal femoral cemented prosthesis revision. Besides the 3D design itself, the perioperative management, especially the techniques for stem implantation, and long-term follow-up are also crucial.