Cargando…

New Light on Endometrial Thickness as a Risk Factor of Cancer: What Do Clinicians Need to Know?

Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) represents an accurate and noninvasive technique to investigate endometrial thickness (ET) in the early diagnosis of endometrial cancer (EC). In the literature, for maximum ET there is no consensus on the cutoff value for normal ET in postmenopause for either symptomat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saccardi, Carlo, Spagnol, Giulia, Bonaldo, Giulio, Marchetti, Matteo, Tozzi, Roberto, Noventa, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35401014
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S294074
_version_ 1784682425522061312
author Saccardi, Carlo
Spagnol, Giulia
Bonaldo, Giulio
Marchetti, Matteo
Tozzi, Roberto
Noventa, Marco
author_facet Saccardi, Carlo
Spagnol, Giulia
Bonaldo, Giulio
Marchetti, Matteo
Tozzi, Roberto
Noventa, Marco
author_sort Saccardi, Carlo
collection PubMed
description Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) represents an accurate and noninvasive technique to investigate endometrial thickness (ET) in the early diagnosis of endometrial cancer (EC). In the literature, for maximum ET there is no consensus on the cutoff value for normal ET in postmenopause for either symptomatic or asymptomatic women. Most patients with EC present with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) and in these patients is necessary to perform TVUS to evaluate ET as an indicator for endometrial biopsy. On the contrary, if ET is incidentally detected in postmenopausal patients without bleeding, endometrial sampling for a postmenopausal woman without bleeding should not be routinely performed, although it is estimated that up to 15% of EC occurs in women without vaginal bleeding. The aim of our review was to give clinicians necessary and useful knowledge on the role of TVUS and ET for early detection of EC in their daily routine practice. Based on the most important studies in the literature, we summarized that in premenopausal woman with abnormal uterine bleeding, an optimal cutoff for ET has not yet been established. For postmenopausal women with PMB, at low risk, and ET <4 mm, a follow-up scan could be offered, and for women with ET ≥4 mm, office hysteroscopy–guided endometrial sampling is recommended independently of ET results. On the other hand, in postmenopausal women with PMB and at high risk of EC, office hysteroscopy–guided endometrial sampling is necessary. In postmenopausal women without PMB and ET ≥4 mm, arbitrary endometrial sampling is not recommended, but evaluated case by case based on risk factors. In conclusion, there is broad consensus on the importance of TVUS and the need for further investigation based on risk factors of EC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8985823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89858232022-04-07 New Light on Endometrial Thickness as a Risk Factor of Cancer: What Do Clinicians Need to Know? Saccardi, Carlo Spagnol, Giulia Bonaldo, Giulio Marchetti, Matteo Tozzi, Roberto Noventa, Marco Cancer Manag Res Review Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) represents an accurate and noninvasive technique to investigate endometrial thickness (ET) in the early diagnosis of endometrial cancer (EC). In the literature, for maximum ET there is no consensus on the cutoff value for normal ET in postmenopause for either symptomatic or asymptomatic women. Most patients with EC present with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) and in these patients is necessary to perform TVUS to evaluate ET as an indicator for endometrial biopsy. On the contrary, if ET is incidentally detected in postmenopausal patients without bleeding, endometrial sampling for a postmenopausal woman without bleeding should not be routinely performed, although it is estimated that up to 15% of EC occurs in women without vaginal bleeding. The aim of our review was to give clinicians necessary and useful knowledge on the role of TVUS and ET for early detection of EC in their daily routine practice. Based on the most important studies in the literature, we summarized that in premenopausal woman with abnormal uterine bleeding, an optimal cutoff for ET has not yet been established. For postmenopausal women with PMB, at low risk, and ET <4 mm, a follow-up scan could be offered, and for women with ET ≥4 mm, office hysteroscopy–guided endometrial sampling is recommended independently of ET results. On the other hand, in postmenopausal women with PMB and at high risk of EC, office hysteroscopy–guided endometrial sampling is necessary. In postmenopausal women without PMB and ET ≥4 mm, arbitrary endometrial sampling is not recommended, but evaluated case by case based on risk factors. In conclusion, there is broad consensus on the importance of TVUS and the need for further investigation based on risk factors of EC. Dove 2022-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8985823/ /pubmed/35401014 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S294074 Text en © 2022 Saccardi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Saccardi, Carlo
Spagnol, Giulia
Bonaldo, Giulio
Marchetti, Matteo
Tozzi, Roberto
Noventa, Marco
New Light on Endometrial Thickness as a Risk Factor of Cancer: What Do Clinicians Need to Know?
title New Light on Endometrial Thickness as a Risk Factor of Cancer: What Do Clinicians Need to Know?
title_full New Light on Endometrial Thickness as a Risk Factor of Cancer: What Do Clinicians Need to Know?
title_fullStr New Light on Endometrial Thickness as a Risk Factor of Cancer: What Do Clinicians Need to Know?
title_full_unstemmed New Light on Endometrial Thickness as a Risk Factor of Cancer: What Do Clinicians Need to Know?
title_short New Light on Endometrial Thickness as a Risk Factor of Cancer: What Do Clinicians Need to Know?
title_sort new light on endometrial thickness as a risk factor of cancer: what do clinicians need to know?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35401014
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S294074
work_keys_str_mv AT saccardicarlo newlightonendometrialthicknessasariskfactorofcancerwhatdocliniciansneedtoknow
AT spagnolgiulia newlightonendometrialthicknessasariskfactorofcancerwhatdocliniciansneedtoknow
AT bonaldogiulio newlightonendometrialthicknessasariskfactorofcancerwhatdocliniciansneedtoknow
AT marchettimatteo newlightonendometrialthicknessasariskfactorofcancerwhatdocliniciansneedtoknow
AT tozziroberto newlightonendometrialthicknessasariskfactorofcancerwhatdocliniciansneedtoknow
AT noventamarco newlightonendometrialthicknessasariskfactorofcancerwhatdocliniciansneedtoknow