Cargando…

Comparison of 5% Phenol With Almond Oil Versus 15% Hypertonic Saline in Treatment of Pediatric Idiopathic Rectal Prolapse

Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the frequency of recurrence with 5% phenol in almond oil versus 15% hypertonic saline for pediatric idiopathic rectal prolapse. Methodology: An open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Paediatric Surgery, Services H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mustafa, Ghulam, Asad, Ali, tul Muntaha, Sidra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8986137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35399434
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23552
_version_ 1784682485996584960
author Mustafa, Ghulam
Asad, Ali
tul Muntaha, Sidra
author_facet Mustafa, Ghulam
Asad, Ali
tul Muntaha, Sidra
author_sort Mustafa, Ghulam
collection PubMed
description Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the frequency of recurrence with 5% phenol in almond oil versus 15% hypertonic saline for pediatric idiopathic rectal prolapse. Methodology: An open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Paediatric Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, over a period of one year from May 1, 2018 to April 30, 2019. Altogether, 120 patients with idiopathic rectal prolapse were included in this study. After obtaining approval from the hospital ethical committee, all patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were admitted to the pediatric surgery inpatient department of Services Hospital, Lahore. Patients were randomized into two groups with an equal number of candidates using the lottery method. Group A consisted of patients who were administered 5% phenol in almond oil and group B consisted of patients who were administered 15% hypertonic saline. All procedures were performed by a single surgical operating team to control bias. Patients were followed up for three months after surgery to note whether recurrence occurred or not. Results: The mean age of the patients was 3.97 ± 2.68 years in group A and 2.87 ± 1.84 years in group B. Gender distribution showed male dominance (71.7% in group A and 73.3% in group B). Statistically significant difference was observed in terms of recurrence (50% in group A and 23.3% in group B) (p=0.002), while statistically insignificant differences were found in terms of postoperative faecal incontinence (2% in each group, p=0.6478) and anal stenosis (8% in group A and 2% in group B with p=0.2426). Conclusion: Thus, 15% hypertonic saline was noted to be a more effective sclerosing agent than 5% phenol in almond oil in the management of idiopathic rectal prolapse in children. It was also found to have a statistically comparable rate of complications, including fecal incontinence and anal stenosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8986137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89861372022-04-08 Comparison of 5% Phenol With Almond Oil Versus 15% Hypertonic Saline in Treatment of Pediatric Idiopathic Rectal Prolapse Mustafa, Ghulam Asad, Ali tul Muntaha, Sidra Cureus Pediatric Surgery Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the frequency of recurrence with 5% phenol in almond oil versus 15% hypertonic saline for pediatric idiopathic rectal prolapse. Methodology: An open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Paediatric Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, over a period of one year from May 1, 2018 to April 30, 2019. Altogether, 120 patients with idiopathic rectal prolapse were included in this study. After obtaining approval from the hospital ethical committee, all patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were admitted to the pediatric surgery inpatient department of Services Hospital, Lahore. Patients were randomized into two groups with an equal number of candidates using the lottery method. Group A consisted of patients who were administered 5% phenol in almond oil and group B consisted of patients who were administered 15% hypertonic saline. All procedures were performed by a single surgical operating team to control bias. Patients were followed up for three months after surgery to note whether recurrence occurred or not. Results: The mean age of the patients was 3.97 ± 2.68 years in group A and 2.87 ± 1.84 years in group B. Gender distribution showed male dominance (71.7% in group A and 73.3% in group B). Statistically significant difference was observed in terms of recurrence (50% in group A and 23.3% in group B) (p=0.002), while statistically insignificant differences were found in terms of postoperative faecal incontinence (2% in each group, p=0.6478) and anal stenosis (8% in group A and 2% in group B with p=0.2426). Conclusion: Thus, 15% hypertonic saline was noted to be a more effective sclerosing agent than 5% phenol in almond oil in the management of idiopathic rectal prolapse in children. It was also found to have a statistically comparable rate of complications, including fecal incontinence and anal stenosis. Cureus 2022-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8986137/ /pubmed/35399434 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23552 Text en Copyright © 2022, Mustafa et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Pediatric Surgery
Mustafa, Ghulam
Asad, Ali
tul Muntaha, Sidra
Comparison of 5% Phenol With Almond Oil Versus 15% Hypertonic Saline in Treatment of Pediatric Idiopathic Rectal Prolapse
title Comparison of 5% Phenol With Almond Oil Versus 15% Hypertonic Saline in Treatment of Pediatric Idiopathic Rectal Prolapse
title_full Comparison of 5% Phenol With Almond Oil Versus 15% Hypertonic Saline in Treatment of Pediatric Idiopathic Rectal Prolapse
title_fullStr Comparison of 5% Phenol With Almond Oil Versus 15% Hypertonic Saline in Treatment of Pediatric Idiopathic Rectal Prolapse
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 5% Phenol With Almond Oil Versus 15% Hypertonic Saline in Treatment of Pediatric Idiopathic Rectal Prolapse
title_short Comparison of 5% Phenol With Almond Oil Versus 15% Hypertonic Saline in Treatment of Pediatric Idiopathic Rectal Prolapse
title_sort comparison of 5% phenol with almond oil versus 15% hypertonic saline in treatment of pediatric idiopathic rectal prolapse
topic Pediatric Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8986137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35399434
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23552
work_keys_str_mv AT mustafaghulam comparisonof5phenolwithalmondoilversus15hypertonicsalineintreatmentofpediatricidiopathicrectalprolapse
AT asadali comparisonof5phenolwithalmondoilversus15hypertonicsalineintreatmentofpediatricidiopathicrectalprolapse
AT tulmuntahasidra comparisonof5phenolwithalmondoilversus15hypertonicsalineintreatmentofpediatricidiopathicrectalprolapse