Cargando…
Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases
BACKGROUND: Cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) had been developed to detect involved breast cavity side margins in real‐time (Miripour et al. Bioeng Transl Med. e10236.). Here, we presented the results of the in vivo human model CDP studies on non‐neoadjuvant cases. METHODS: This study is a prospective,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8986141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4503 |
_version_ | 1784682486926671872 |
---|---|
author | Miripour, Zohreh Sadat Abbasvandi, Fereshteh Aghaee, Parisa Shojaeian, Fatemeh Faramarzpour, Mahsa Mohaghegh, Pooneh Hoseinpour, Parisa Namdar, Naser Hassanpour Amiri, Morteza Ghafari, Hadi Parniani, Mohammad Kaviani, Ahmad Alamdar, Sedigheh NajafiKhoshnoo, Sahar Sanati, Hassan Mapar, Mahna Sadeghian, Nastaran Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil Yunesian, Masud Abdolahad, Mohammad |
author_facet | Miripour, Zohreh Sadat Abbasvandi, Fereshteh Aghaee, Parisa Shojaeian, Fatemeh Faramarzpour, Mahsa Mohaghegh, Pooneh Hoseinpour, Parisa Namdar, Naser Hassanpour Amiri, Morteza Ghafari, Hadi Parniani, Mohammad Kaviani, Ahmad Alamdar, Sedigheh NajafiKhoshnoo, Sahar Sanati, Hassan Mapar, Mahna Sadeghian, Nastaran Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil Yunesian, Masud Abdolahad, Mohammad |
author_sort | Miripour, Zohreh Sadat |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) had been developed to detect involved breast cavity side margins in real‐time (Miripour et al. Bioeng Transl Med. e10236.). Here, we presented the results of the in vivo human model CDP studies on non‐neoadjuvant cases. METHODS: This study is a prospective, blind comparison to a gold standard, and the medical group recruited patients. CDP and frozen data were achieved before the permanent pathology experiment. The main outcome of the study is surgical margin status. From November 2018 to April 2020, 202 patients were registered, and 188 were assigned for the study. Breast‐conserving surgery at any age or gender, re‐surgery due to re‐currency, or involved margins are acceptable. Patients must be non‐neoadjuvant. The reliability of CDP scoring had been evaluated by the pathology of the scored IMs. Then, three models of the study were designed to compare CDP with the frozen sections. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and AUC were measured based on the permanent postoperative pathology gold standard. RESULTS: A matched clinical diagnostic categorization between the pathological results of the tested IMs and response peaks of CDP on 113 cases, was reported (sensitivity = 97%, specificity = 89.3%, accuracy = 92%, positive predictive value (PPV) = 84.2%, and negative predictive value (NPV) = 98%). Study A showed the independent ability of CDP for IM scoring (sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 90%, accuracy = 90%, PPV = 22.2%, and NPV = 99.2%). Study B showed the complementary role of CDP to cover the missed lesions of frozen sections (sensitivity = 93.8%, specificity = 91%, accuracy = 91%, PPV = 55.6%, and NPV = 99.2%). Study C showed the ability of CDP in helping the pathologist to reduce his/her frozen miss judgment (specificity = 92%, accuracy = 93%, PPV = 42.1%, and NPV = 100%). Results were reported based on the post‐surgical permanent pathology gold standard. CONCLUSION: CDP scoring ability in intra‐operative margin detection was verified on non‐neoadjuvant breast cancer patients. Non‐invasive real‐time diagnosis of IMs with pathological values may make CDP a distinct tool with handheld equipment to increase the prognosis of breast cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8986141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89861412022-04-11 Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases Miripour, Zohreh Sadat Abbasvandi, Fereshteh Aghaee, Parisa Shojaeian, Fatemeh Faramarzpour, Mahsa Mohaghegh, Pooneh Hoseinpour, Parisa Namdar, Naser Hassanpour Amiri, Morteza Ghafari, Hadi Parniani, Mohammad Kaviani, Ahmad Alamdar, Sedigheh NajafiKhoshnoo, Sahar Sanati, Hassan Mapar, Mahna Sadeghian, Nastaran Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil Yunesian, Masud Abdolahad, Mohammad Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) had been developed to detect involved breast cavity side margins in real‐time (Miripour et al. Bioeng Transl Med. e10236.). Here, we presented the results of the in vivo human model CDP studies on non‐neoadjuvant cases. METHODS: This study is a prospective, blind comparison to a gold standard, and the medical group recruited patients. CDP and frozen data were achieved before the permanent pathology experiment. The main outcome of the study is surgical margin status. From November 2018 to April 2020, 202 patients were registered, and 188 were assigned for the study. Breast‐conserving surgery at any age or gender, re‐surgery due to re‐currency, or involved margins are acceptable. Patients must be non‐neoadjuvant. The reliability of CDP scoring had been evaluated by the pathology of the scored IMs. Then, three models of the study were designed to compare CDP with the frozen sections. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and AUC were measured based on the permanent postoperative pathology gold standard. RESULTS: A matched clinical diagnostic categorization between the pathological results of the tested IMs and response peaks of CDP on 113 cases, was reported (sensitivity = 97%, specificity = 89.3%, accuracy = 92%, positive predictive value (PPV) = 84.2%, and negative predictive value (NPV) = 98%). Study A showed the independent ability of CDP for IM scoring (sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 90%, accuracy = 90%, PPV = 22.2%, and NPV = 99.2%). Study B showed the complementary role of CDP to cover the missed lesions of frozen sections (sensitivity = 93.8%, specificity = 91%, accuracy = 91%, PPV = 55.6%, and NPV = 99.2%). Study C showed the ability of CDP in helping the pathologist to reduce his/her frozen miss judgment (specificity = 92%, accuracy = 93%, PPV = 42.1%, and NPV = 100%). Results were reported based on the post‐surgical permanent pathology gold standard. CONCLUSION: CDP scoring ability in intra‐operative margin detection was verified on non‐neoadjuvant breast cancer patients. Non‐invasive real‐time diagnosis of IMs with pathological values may make CDP a distinct tool with handheld equipment to increase the prognosis of breast cancer patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8986141/ /pubmed/35224879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4503 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Miripour, Zohreh Sadat Abbasvandi, Fereshteh Aghaee, Parisa Shojaeian, Fatemeh Faramarzpour, Mahsa Mohaghegh, Pooneh Hoseinpour, Parisa Namdar, Naser Hassanpour Amiri, Morteza Ghafari, Hadi Parniani, Mohammad Kaviani, Ahmad Alamdar, Sedigheh NajafiKhoshnoo, Sahar Sanati, Hassan Mapar, Mahna Sadeghian, Nastaran Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil Yunesian, Masud Abdolahad, Mohammad Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases |
title | Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases |
title_full | Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases |
title_fullStr | Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases |
title_full_unstemmed | Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases |
title_short | Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases |
title_sort | human study on cancer diagnostic probe (cdp) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8986141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4503 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miripourzohrehsadat humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT abbasvandifereshteh humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT aghaeeparisa humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT shojaeianfatemeh humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT faramarzpourmahsa humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT mohagheghpooneh humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT hoseinpourparisa humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT namdarnaser humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT hassanpouramirimorteza humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT ghafarihadi humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT parnianimohammad humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT kavianiahmad humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT alamdarsedigheh humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT najafikhoshnoosahar humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT sanatihassan humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT maparmahna humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT sadeghiannastaran humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT akbarimohammadesmaeil humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT yunesianmasud humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases AT abdolahadmohammad humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases |