Cargando…

Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases

BACKGROUND: Cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) had been developed to detect involved breast cavity side margins in real‐time (Miripour et al. Bioeng Transl Med. e10236.). Here, we presented the results of the in vivo human model CDP studies on non‐neoadjuvant cases. METHODS: This study is a prospective,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miripour, Zohreh Sadat, Abbasvandi, Fereshteh, Aghaee, Parisa, Shojaeian, Fatemeh, Faramarzpour, Mahsa, Mohaghegh, Pooneh, Hoseinpour, Parisa, Namdar, Naser, Hassanpour Amiri, Morteza, Ghafari, Hadi, Parniani, Mohammad, Kaviani, Ahmad, Alamdar, Sedigheh, NajafiKhoshnoo, Sahar, Sanati, Hassan, Mapar, Mahna, Sadeghian, Nastaran, Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil, Yunesian, Masud, Abdolahad, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8986141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4503
_version_ 1784682486926671872
author Miripour, Zohreh Sadat
Abbasvandi, Fereshteh
Aghaee, Parisa
Shojaeian, Fatemeh
Faramarzpour, Mahsa
Mohaghegh, Pooneh
Hoseinpour, Parisa
Namdar, Naser
Hassanpour Amiri, Morteza
Ghafari, Hadi
Parniani, Mohammad
Kaviani, Ahmad
Alamdar, Sedigheh
NajafiKhoshnoo, Sahar
Sanati, Hassan
Mapar, Mahna
Sadeghian, Nastaran
Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil
Yunesian, Masud
Abdolahad, Mohammad
author_facet Miripour, Zohreh Sadat
Abbasvandi, Fereshteh
Aghaee, Parisa
Shojaeian, Fatemeh
Faramarzpour, Mahsa
Mohaghegh, Pooneh
Hoseinpour, Parisa
Namdar, Naser
Hassanpour Amiri, Morteza
Ghafari, Hadi
Parniani, Mohammad
Kaviani, Ahmad
Alamdar, Sedigheh
NajafiKhoshnoo, Sahar
Sanati, Hassan
Mapar, Mahna
Sadeghian, Nastaran
Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil
Yunesian, Masud
Abdolahad, Mohammad
author_sort Miripour, Zohreh Sadat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) had been developed to detect involved breast cavity side margins in real‐time (Miripour et al. Bioeng Transl Med. e10236.). Here, we presented the results of the in vivo human model CDP studies on non‐neoadjuvant cases. METHODS: This study is a prospective, blind comparison to a gold standard, and the medical group recruited patients. CDP and frozen data were achieved before the permanent pathology experiment. The main outcome of the study is surgical margin status. From November 2018 to April 2020, 202 patients were registered, and 188 were assigned for the study. Breast‐conserving surgery at any age or gender, re‐surgery due to re‐currency, or involved margins are acceptable. Patients must be non‐neoadjuvant. The reliability of CDP scoring had been evaluated by the pathology of the scored IMs. Then, three models of the study were designed to compare CDP with the frozen sections. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and AUC were measured based on the permanent postoperative pathology gold standard. RESULTS: A matched clinical diagnostic categorization between the pathological results of the tested IMs and response peaks of CDP on 113 cases, was reported (sensitivity = 97%, specificity = 89.3%, accuracy = 92%, positive predictive value (PPV) = 84.2%, and negative predictive value (NPV) = 98%). Study A showed the independent ability of CDP for IM scoring (sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 90%, accuracy = 90%, PPV = 22.2%, and NPV = 99.2%). Study B showed the complementary role of CDP to cover the missed lesions of frozen sections (sensitivity = 93.8%, specificity = 91%, accuracy = 91%, PPV = 55.6%, and NPV = 99.2%). Study C showed the ability of CDP in helping the pathologist to reduce his/her frozen miss judgment (specificity = 92%, accuracy = 93%, PPV = 42.1%, and NPV = 100%). Results were reported based on the post‐surgical permanent pathology gold standard. CONCLUSION: CDP scoring ability in intra‐operative margin detection was verified on non‐neoadjuvant breast cancer patients. Non‐invasive real‐time diagnosis of IMs with pathological values may make CDP a distinct tool with handheld equipment to increase the prognosis of breast cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8986141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89861412022-04-11 Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases Miripour, Zohreh Sadat Abbasvandi, Fereshteh Aghaee, Parisa Shojaeian, Fatemeh Faramarzpour, Mahsa Mohaghegh, Pooneh Hoseinpour, Parisa Namdar, Naser Hassanpour Amiri, Morteza Ghafari, Hadi Parniani, Mohammad Kaviani, Ahmad Alamdar, Sedigheh NajafiKhoshnoo, Sahar Sanati, Hassan Mapar, Mahna Sadeghian, Nastaran Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil Yunesian, Masud Abdolahad, Mohammad Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) had been developed to detect involved breast cavity side margins in real‐time (Miripour et al. Bioeng Transl Med. e10236.). Here, we presented the results of the in vivo human model CDP studies on non‐neoadjuvant cases. METHODS: This study is a prospective, blind comparison to a gold standard, and the medical group recruited patients. CDP and frozen data were achieved before the permanent pathology experiment. The main outcome of the study is surgical margin status. From November 2018 to April 2020, 202 patients were registered, and 188 were assigned for the study. Breast‐conserving surgery at any age or gender, re‐surgery due to re‐currency, or involved margins are acceptable. Patients must be non‐neoadjuvant. The reliability of CDP scoring had been evaluated by the pathology of the scored IMs. Then, three models of the study were designed to compare CDP with the frozen sections. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and AUC were measured based on the permanent postoperative pathology gold standard. RESULTS: A matched clinical diagnostic categorization between the pathological results of the tested IMs and response peaks of CDP on 113 cases, was reported (sensitivity = 97%, specificity = 89.3%, accuracy = 92%, positive predictive value (PPV) = 84.2%, and negative predictive value (NPV) = 98%). Study A showed the independent ability of CDP for IM scoring (sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 90%, accuracy = 90%, PPV = 22.2%, and NPV = 99.2%). Study B showed the complementary role of CDP to cover the missed lesions of frozen sections (sensitivity = 93.8%, specificity = 91%, accuracy = 91%, PPV = 55.6%, and NPV = 99.2%). Study C showed the ability of CDP in helping the pathologist to reduce his/her frozen miss judgment (specificity = 92%, accuracy = 93%, PPV = 42.1%, and NPV = 100%). Results were reported based on the post‐surgical permanent pathology gold standard. CONCLUSION: CDP scoring ability in intra‐operative margin detection was verified on non‐neoadjuvant breast cancer patients. Non‐invasive real‐time diagnosis of IMs with pathological values may make CDP a distinct tool with handheld equipment to increase the prognosis of breast cancer patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8986141/ /pubmed/35224879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4503 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Miripour, Zohreh Sadat
Abbasvandi, Fereshteh
Aghaee, Parisa
Shojaeian, Fatemeh
Faramarzpour, Mahsa
Mohaghegh, Pooneh
Hoseinpour, Parisa
Namdar, Naser
Hassanpour Amiri, Morteza
Ghafari, Hadi
Parniani, Mohammad
Kaviani, Ahmad
Alamdar, Sedigheh
NajafiKhoshnoo, Sahar
Sanati, Hassan
Mapar, Mahna
Sadeghian, Nastaran
Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil
Yunesian, Masud
Abdolahad, Mohammad
Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases
title Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases
title_full Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases
title_fullStr Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases
title_full_unstemmed Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases
title_short Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases
title_sort human study on cancer diagnostic probe (cdp) for real‐time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non‐neoadjuvant cases
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8986141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4503
work_keys_str_mv AT miripourzohrehsadat humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT abbasvandifereshteh humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT aghaeeparisa humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT shojaeianfatemeh humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT faramarzpourmahsa humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT mohagheghpooneh humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT hoseinpourparisa humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT namdarnaser humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT hassanpouramirimorteza humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT ghafarihadi humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT parnianimohammad humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT kavianiahmad humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT alamdarsedigheh humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT najafikhoshnoosahar humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT sanatihassan humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT maparmahna humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT sadeghiannastaran humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT akbarimohammadesmaeil humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT yunesianmasud humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases
AT abdolahadmohammad humanstudyoncancerdiagnosticprobecdpforrealtimeexcisingofbreastpositivecavitysidemarginsbasedontracinghypoxiaglycolysischeckingdiagnosticaccuracyinnonneoadjuvantcases