Cargando…
Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed
As of early 2022, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains a substantial global health concern. Different treatments for COVID-19, such as anti-COVID-19 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), have been developed under tight timelines. Not only mAb product and clinical development...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8986202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35380922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2022.2060724 |
_version_ | 1784682498045771776 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Jianlin Ou, Jianfa McHugh, Kyle P. Borys, Michael C. Khetan, Anurag |
author_facet | Xu, Jianlin Ou, Jianfa McHugh, Kyle P. Borys, Michael C. Khetan, Anurag |
author_sort | Xu, Jianlin |
collection | PubMed |
description | As of early 2022, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains a substantial global health concern. Different treatments for COVID-19, such as anti-COVID-19 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), have been developed under tight timelines. Not only mAb product and clinical development but also chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) process development at pandemic speed are required to address this highly unmet patient need. CMC development consists of early- and late-stage process development to ensure sufficient mAb manufacturing yield and consistent product quality for patient safety and efficacy. Here, we report a case study of late-stage cell culture process development at pandemic speed for mAb1 and mAb2 production as a combination therapy for a highly unmet patient treatment. We completed late-stage cell culture process characterization (PC) within approximately 4 months from the cell culture process definition to the initiation of the manufacturing process performance qualification (PPQ) campaign for mAb1 and mAb2, in comparison to a standard one-year PC timeline. Different strategies were presented in detail at different PC steps, i.e., pre-PC risk assessment, scale-down model development and qualification, formal PC experiments, and in-process control strategy development for a successful PPQ campaign that did not sacrifice quality. The strategies we present may be applied to accelerate late-stage process development for other biologics to reduce timelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8986202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89862022022-04-07 Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed Xu, Jianlin Ou, Jianfa McHugh, Kyle P. Borys, Michael C. Khetan, Anurag MAbs Report As of early 2022, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains a substantial global health concern. Different treatments for COVID-19, such as anti-COVID-19 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), have been developed under tight timelines. Not only mAb product and clinical development but also chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) process development at pandemic speed are required to address this highly unmet patient need. CMC development consists of early- and late-stage process development to ensure sufficient mAb manufacturing yield and consistent product quality for patient safety and efficacy. Here, we report a case study of late-stage cell culture process development at pandemic speed for mAb1 and mAb2 production as a combination therapy for a highly unmet patient treatment. We completed late-stage cell culture process characterization (PC) within approximately 4 months from the cell culture process definition to the initiation of the manufacturing process performance qualification (PPQ) campaign for mAb1 and mAb2, in comparison to a standard one-year PC timeline. Different strategies were presented in detail at different PC steps, i.e., pre-PC risk assessment, scale-down model development and qualification, formal PC experiments, and in-process control strategy development for a successful PPQ campaign that did not sacrifice quality. The strategies we present may be applied to accelerate late-stage process development for other biologics to reduce timelines. Taylor & Francis 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8986202/ /pubmed/35380922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2022.2060724 Text en © 2022 Bristol Myers Squibb. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Report Xu, Jianlin Ou, Jianfa McHugh, Kyle P. Borys, Michael C. Khetan, Anurag Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed |
title | Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed |
title_full | Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed |
title_fullStr | Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed |
title_full_unstemmed | Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed |
title_short | Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed |
title_sort | upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed |
topic | Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8986202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35380922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2022.2060724 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xujianlin upstreamcellcultureprocesscharacterizationandinprocesscontrolstrategydevelopmentatpandemicspeed AT oujianfa upstreamcellcultureprocesscharacterizationandinprocesscontrolstrategydevelopmentatpandemicspeed AT mchughkylep upstreamcellcultureprocesscharacterizationandinprocesscontrolstrategydevelopmentatpandemicspeed AT borysmichaelc upstreamcellcultureprocesscharacterizationandinprocesscontrolstrategydevelopmentatpandemicspeed AT khetananurag upstreamcellcultureprocesscharacterizationandinprocesscontrolstrategydevelopmentatpandemicspeed |