Cargando…

Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed

As of early 2022, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains a substantial global health concern. Different treatments for COVID-19, such as anti-COVID-19 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), have been developed under tight timelines. Not only mAb product and clinical development...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Jianlin, Ou, Jianfa, McHugh, Kyle P., Borys, Michael C., Khetan, Anurag
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8986202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35380922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2022.2060724
_version_ 1784682498045771776
author Xu, Jianlin
Ou, Jianfa
McHugh, Kyle P.
Borys, Michael C.
Khetan, Anurag
author_facet Xu, Jianlin
Ou, Jianfa
McHugh, Kyle P.
Borys, Michael C.
Khetan, Anurag
author_sort Xu, Jianlin
collection PubMed
description As of early 2022, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains a substantial global health concern. Different treatments for COVID-19, such as anti-COVID-19 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), have been developed under tight timelines. Not only mAb product and clinical development but also chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) process development at pandemic speed are required to address this highly unmet patient need. CMC development consists of early- and late-stage process development to ensure sufficient mAb manufacturing yield and consistent product quality for patient safety and efficacy. Here, we report a case study of late-stage cell culture process development at pandemic speed for mAb1 and mAb2 production as a combination therapy for a highly unmet patient treatment. We completed late-stage cell culture process characterization (PC) within approximately 4 months from the cell culture process definition to the initiation of the manufacturing process performance qualification (PPQ) campaign for mAb1 and mAb2, in comparison to a standard one-year PC timeline. Different strategies were presented in detail at different PC steps, i.e., pre-PC risk assessment, scale-down model development and qualification, formal PC experiments, and in-process control strategy development for a successful PPQ campaign that did not sacrifice quality. The strategies we present may be applied to accelerate late-stage process development for other biologics to reduce timelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8986202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89862022022-04-07 Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed Xu, Jianlin Ou, Jianfa McHugh, Kyle P. Borys, Michael C. Khetan, Anurag MAbs Report As of early 2022, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains a substantial global health concern. Different treatments for COVID-19, such as anti-COVID-19 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), have been developed under tight timelines. Not only mAb product and clinical development but also chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) process development at pandemic speed are required to address this highly unmet patient need. CMC development consists of early- and late-stage process development to ensure sufficient mAb manufacturing yield and consistent product quality for patient safety and efficacy. Here, we report a case study of late-stage cell culture process development at pandemic speed for mAb1 and mAb2 production as a combination therapy for a highly unmet patient treatment. We completed late-stage cell culture process characterization (PC) within approximately 4 months from the cell culture process definition to the initiation of the manufacturing process performance qualification (PPQ) campaign for mAb1 and mAb2, in comparison to a standard one-year PC timeline. Different strategies were presented in detail at different PC steps, i.e., pre-PC risk assessment, scale-down model development and qualification, formal PC experiments, and in-process control strategy development for a successful PPQ campaign that did not sacrifice quality. The strategies we present may be applied to accelerate late-stage process development for other biologics to reduce timelines. Taylor & Francis 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8986202/ /pubmed/35380922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2022.2060724 Text en © 2022 Bristol Myers Squibb. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Report
Xu, Jianlin
Ou, Jianfa
McHugh, Kyle P.
Borys, Michael C.
Khetan, Anurag
Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed
title Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed
title_full Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed
title_fullStr Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed
title_full_unstemmed Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed
title_short Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed
title_sort upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed
topic Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8986202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35380922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2022.2060724
work_keys_str_mv AT xujianlin upstreamcellcultureprocesscharacterizationandinprocesscontrolstrategydevelopmentatpandemicspeed
AT oujianfa upstreamcellcultureprocesscharacterizationandinprocesscontrolstrategydevelopmentatpandemicspeed
AT mchughkylep upstreamcellcultureprocesscharacterizationandinprocesscontrolstrategydevelopmentatpandemicspeed
AT borysmichaelc upstreamcellcultureprocesscharacterizationandinprocesscontrolstrategydevelopmentatpandemicspeed
AT khetananurag upstreamcellcultureprocesscharacterizationandinprocesscontrolstrategydevelopmentatpandemicspeed