Cargando…
Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
PURPOSE: Staple line reinforcement (SLR) during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the most commonly utilized techniques for SLR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8986671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35169954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-05950-z |
_version_ | 1784682581651881984 |
---|---|
author | Aiolfi, Alberto Gagner, Michel Zappa, Marco Antonio Lastraioli, Caterina Lombardo, Francesca Panizzo, Valerio Bonitta, Gianluca Cavalli, Marta Campanelli, Giampiero Bona, Davide |
author_facet | Aiolfi, Alberto Gagner, Michel Zappa, Marco Antonio Lastraioli, Caterina Lombardo, Francesca Panizzo, Valerio Bonitta, Gianluca Cavalli, Marta Campanelli, Giampiero Bona, Davide |
author_sort | Aiolfi, Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Staple line reinforcement (SLR) during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the most commonly utilized techniques for SLR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare no reinforcement (NR), suture oversewing (SR), glue reinforcement (GR), bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement (Gore® Seamguard®) (GoR), and clips reinforcement (CR). Risk Ratio (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were used as pooled effect size measures. RESULTS: Overall, 3994 patients (17 RCTs) were included. Of those, 1641 (41.1%) underwent NR, 1507 (37.7%) SR, 689 (17.2%) GR, 107 (2.7%) GoR, and 50 (1.3%) CR. SR was associated with a significantly reduced risk of bleeding (RR=0.51; 95% CrI 0.31–0.88), staple line leak (RR=0.56; 95% CrI 0.32–0.99), and overall complications (RR=0.50; 95% CrI 0.30–0.88) compared to NR while no differences were found vs. GR, GoR, and CR. Operative time was significantly longer for SR (WMD=16.2; 95% CrI 10.8–21.7), GR (WMD=15.0; 95% CrI 7.7–22.4), and GoR (WMD=15.5; 95% CrI 5.6–25.4) compared to NR. Among treatments, there were no significant differences for surgical site infection (SSI), sleeve stenosis, reoperation, hospital length of stay, and 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: SR seems associated with a reduced risk of bleeding, leak, and overall complications compared to NR while no differences were found vs. GR, GoR, and CR. Data regarding GoR and CR are limited while further trials reporting outcomes for these techniques are warranted. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-022-05950-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8986671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89866712022-04-22 Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Aiolfi, Alberto Gagner, Michel Zappa, Marco Antonio Lastraioli, Caterina Lombardo, Francesca Panizzo, Valerio Bonitta, Gianluca Cavalli, Marta Campanelli, Giampiero Bona, Davide Obes Surg Original Contributions PURPOSE: Staple line reinforcement (SLR) during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the most commonly utilized techniques for SLR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare no reinforcement (NR), suture oversewing (SR), glue reinforcement (GR), bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement (Gore® Seamguard®) (GoR), and clips reinforcement (CR). Risk Ratio (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were used as pooled effect size measures. RESULTS: Overall, 3994 patients (17 RCTs) were included. Of those, 1641 (41.1%) underwent NR, 1507 (37.7%) SR, 689 (17.2%) GR, 107 (2.7%) GoR, and 50 (1.3%) CR. SR was associated with a significantly reduced risk of bleeding (RR=0.51; 95% CrI 0.31–0.88), staple line leak (RR=0.56; 95% CrI 0.32–0.99), and overall complications (RR=0.50; 95% CrI 0.30–0.88) compared to NR while no differences were found vs. GR, GoR, and CR. Operative time was significantly longer for SR (WMD=16.2; 95% CrI 10.8–21.7), GR (WMD=15.0; 95% CrI 7.7–22.4), and GoR (WMD=15.5; 95% CrI 5.6–25.4) compared to NR. Among treatments, there were no significant differences for surgical site infection (SSI), sleeve stenosis, reoperation, hospital length of stay, and 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: SR seems associated with a reduced risk of bleeding, leak, and overall complications compared to NR while no differences were found vs. GR, GoR, and CR. Data regarding GoR and CR are limited while further trials reporting outcomes for these techniques are warranted. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-022-05950-z. Springer US 2022-02-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8986671/ /pubmed/35169954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-05950-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Contributions Aiolfi, Alberto Gagner, Michel Zappa, Marco Antonio Lastraioli, Caterina Lombardo, Francesca Panizzo, Valerio Bonitta, Gianluca Cavalli, Marta Campanelli, Giampiero Bona, Davide Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Original Contributions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8986671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35169954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-05950-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aiolfialberto staplelinereinforcementduringlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomysystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT gagnermichel staplelinereinforcementduringlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomysystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zappamarcoantonio staplelinereinforcementduringlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomysystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lastraiolicaterina staplelinereinforcementduringlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomysystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lombardofrancesca staplelinereinforcementduringlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomysystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT panizzovalerio staplelinereinforcementduringlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomysystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT bonittagianluca staplelinereinforcementduringlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomysystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT cavallimarta staplelinereinforcementduringlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomysystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT campanelligiampiero staplelinereinforcementduringlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomysystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT bonadavide staplelinereinforcementduringlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomysystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |