Cargando…

Introgressive hybridisation between domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) and endemic Corsican wild boars (S. s. meridionalis): effects of human-mediated interventions

Owing to the intensified domestication process with artificial trait selection, introgressive hybridisation between domestic and wild species poses a management problem. Traditional free-range livestock husbandry, as practiced in Corsica and Sardinia, is known to facilitate hybridisation between wil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schleimer, Anna, Richart, Lorraine, Drygala, Frank, Casabianca, François, Maestrini, Oscar, Weigand, Hannah, Schwartz, Chantal, Mittelbronn, Michel, Frantz, Alain C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8986821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41437-022-00517-1
_version_ 1784682615162273792
author Schleimer, Anna
Richart, Lorraine
Drygala, Frank
Casabianca, François
Maestrini, Oscar
Weigand, Hannah
Schwartz, Chantal
Mittelbronn, Michel
Frantz, Alain C.
author_facet Schleimer, Anna
Richart, Lorraine
Drygala, Frank
Casabianca, François
Maestrini, Oscar
Weigand, Hannah
Schwartz, Chantal
Mittelbronn, Michel
Frantz, Alain C.
author_sort Schleimer, Anna
collection PubMed
description Owing to the intensified domestication process with artificial trait selection, introgressive hybridisation between domestic and wild species poses a management problem. Traditional free-range livestock husbandry, as practiced in Corsica and Sardinia, is known to facilitate hybridisation between wild boars and domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Here, we assessed the genetic distinctness and genome-wide domestic pig ancestry levels of the Corsican wild boar subspecies S. s. meridionalis, with reference to its Sardinian conspecifics, employing a genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay and mitochondrial control region (mtCR) haplotypes. We also assessed the reliance of morphological criteria and the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) coat colour gene to identify individuals with domestic introgression. While Corsican wild boars showed closest affinity to Sardinian and Italian wild boars compared to other European populations based on principal component analysis, the observation of previously undescribed mtCR haplotypes and high levels of nuclear divergence (Weir’s θ > 0.14) highlighted the genetic distinctness of Corsican S. s. meridionalis. Across three complementary analyses of mixed ancestry (i.e., STRUCTURE, PCADMIX, and ELAI), proportions of domestic pig ancestry were estimated at 9.5% in Corsican wild boars, which was significantly higher than in wild boars in Sardinia, where free-range pig keeping was banned in 2012. Comparison of morphologically pure- and hybrid-looking Corsican wild boars suggested a weak correlation between morphological criteria and genome-wide domestic pig ancestry. The study highlights the usefulness of molecular markers to assess the direct impacts of management practices on gene flow between domestic and wild species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8986821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89868212022-04-22 Introgressive hybridisation between domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) and endemic Corsican wild boars (S. s. meridionalis): effects of human-mediated interventions Schleimer, Anna Richart, Lorraine Drygala, Frank Casabianca, François Maestrini, Oscar Weigand, Hannah Schwartz, Chantal Mittelbronn, Michel Frantz, Alain C. Heredity (Edinb) Article Owing to the intensified domestication process with artificial trait selection, introgressive hybridisation between domestic and wild species poses a management problem. Traditional free-range livestock husbandry, as practiced in Corsica and Sardinia, is known to facilitate hybridisation between wild boars and domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Here, we assessed the genetic distinctness and genome-wide domestic pig ancestry levels of the Corsican wild boar subspecies S. s. meridionalis, with reference to its Sardinian conspecifics, employing a genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay and mitochondrial control region (mtCR) haplotypes. We also assessed the reliance of morphological criteria and the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) coat colour gene to identify individuals with domestic introgression. While Corsican wild boars showed closest affinity to Sardinian and Italian wild boars compared to other European populations based on principal component analysis, the observation of previously undescribed mtCR haplotypes and high levels of nuclear divergence (Weir’s θ > 0.14) highlighted the genetic distinctness of Corsican S. s. meridionalis. Across three complementary analyses of mixed ancestry (i.e., STRUCTURE, PCADMIX, and ELAI), proportions of domestic pig ancestry were estimated at 9.5% in Corsican wild boars, which was significantly higher than in wild boars in Sardinia, where free-range pig keeping was banned in 2012. Comparison of morphologically pure- and hybrid-looking Corsican wild boars suggested a weak correlation between morphological criteria and genome-wide domestic pig ancestry. The study highlights the usefulness of molecular markers to assess the direct impacts of management practices on gene flow between domestic and wild species. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-10 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8986821/ /pubmed/35273382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41437-022-00517-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Schleimer, Anna
Richart, Lorraine
Drygala, Frank
Casabianca, François
Maestrini, Oscar
Weigand, Hannah
Schwartz, Chantal
Mittelbronn, Michel
Frantz, Alain C.
Introgressive hybridisation between domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) and endemic Corsican wild boars (S. s. meridionalis): effects of human-mediated interventions
title Introgressive hybridisation between domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) and endemic Corsican wild boars (S. s. meridionalis): effects of human-mediated interventions
title_full Introgressive hybridisation between domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) and endemic Corsican wild boars (S. s. meridionalis): effects of human-mediated interventions
title_fullStr Introgressive hybridisation between domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) and endemic Corsican wild boars (S. s. meridionalis): effects of human-mediated interventions
title_full_unstemmed Introgressive hybridisation between domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) and endemic Corsican wild boars (S. s. meridionalis): effects of human-mediated interventions
title_short Introgressive hybridisation between domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) and endemic Corsican wild boars (S. s. meridionalis): effects of human-mediated interventions
title_sort introgressive hybridisation between domestic pigs (sus scrofa domesticus) and endemic corsican wild boars (s. s. meridionalis): effects of human-mediated interventions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8986821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41437-022-00517-1
work_keys_str_mv AT schleimeranna introgressivehybridisationbetweendomesticpigssusscrofadomesticusandendemiccorsicanwildboarsssmeridionaliseffectsofhumanmediatedinterventions
AT richartlorraine introgressivehybridisationbetweendomesticpigssusscrofadomesticusandendemiccorsicanwildboarsssmeridionaliseffectsofhumanmediatedinterventions
AT drygalafrank introgressivehybridisationbetweendomesticpigssusscrofadomesticusandendemiccorsicanwildboarsssmeridionaliseffectsofhumanmediatedinterventions
AT casabiancafrancois introgressivehybridisationbetweendomesticpigssusscrofadomesticusandendemiccorsicanwildboarsssmeridionaliseffectsofhumanmediatedinterventions
AT maestrinioscar introgressivehybridisationbetweendomesticpigssusscrofadomesticusandendemiccorsicanwildboarsssmeridionaliseffectsofhumanmediatedinterventions
AT weigandhannah introgressivehybridisationbetweendomesticpigssusscrofadomesticusandendemiccorsicanwildboarsssmeridionaliseffectsofhumanmediatedinterventions
AT schwartzchantal introgressivehybridisationbetweendomesticpigssusscrofadomesticusandendemiccorsicanwildboarsssmeridionaliseffectsofhumanmediatedinterventions
AT mittelbronnmichel introgressivehybridisationbetweendomesticpigssusscrofadomesticusandendemiccorsicanwildboarsssmeridionaliseffectsofhumanmediatedinterventions
AT frantzalainc introgressivehybridisationbetweendomesticpigssusscrofadomesticusandendemiccorsicanwildboarsssmeridionaliseffectsofhumanmediatedinterventions