Cargando…

Opioid Use at End-Of-Life Among Nova Scotia Patients With Cancer

Purpose: To determine the factors associated with opioid analgesic prescriptions as measured by community pharmacy dispensations to all Nova Scotia (NS) patients with cancer at end-of-life from 2005 to 2009. Methods: The NS Cancer Registry and the NS Prescription Monitoring Program (NSPMP) were used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minard, Laura V., Fisher, Judith, Broadfield, Larry, Walsh, Gordon, Sketris, Ingrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8987150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35401210
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.836864
_version_ 1784682675834978304
author Minard, Laura V.
Fisher, Judith
Broadfield, Larry
Walsh, Gordon
Sketris, Ingrid
author_facet Minard, Laura V.
Fisher, Judith
Broadfield, Larry
Walsh, Gordon
Sketris, Ingrid
author_sort Minard, Laura V.
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To determine the factors associated with opioid analgesic prescriptions as measured by community pharmacy dispensations to all Nova Scotia (NS) patients with cancer at end-of-life from 2005 to 2009. Methods: The NS Cancer Registry and the NS Prescription Monitoring Program (NSPMP) were used to link Nova Scotians who had a cancer diagnosis and received a prescription for opioids in their last year of life (n = 6,186) from 2005 to 2009. The association of factors with opioid dispensations at end-of-life were determined (e.g., patient demographics, type of prescriber, type of cancer, and opioid type, formulation, and dose). Results: Almost 54% (n = 6,186) of the end-of-life study population with cancer (n = 11,498) was linked to the NSPMP and therefore dispensed opioids. Most prescriptions were written by general practitioners (89%) and were for strong opioids (81%). Immediate-release formulations were more common than modified-release formulations. Although the annual average parenteral morphine equivalents (MEQ) did not change during the study period, the number of opioid prescriptions per patient per year increased from 5.9 in 2006 to 7.0 in 2009 (p < 0.0001). Patients age 80 and over received the fewest prescriptions (mean 3.9/year) and the lowest opioid doses (17.0 MEQ) while patients aged 40–49 received the most prescriptions (mean 14.5/year) and the highest doses of opioid (80.2 MEQ). Conclusion: Our study examined opioid analgesic use at end-of-life in patients with cancer for a large real-world population and determined factors, trends and patterns associated with type and dose of opioid dispensed. We provide information regarding how general practitioners prescribe opioid therapy to patients at end-of-life. Our data suggest that at the time of this study, there may have been under-prescribing of opioids to patients with cancer at end-of-life. This information can be used to increase awareness among general practitioners, and to inform recommendations from professional regulatory bodies, to aid in managing pain for cancer patients at end-of-life. Future work could address how opioid prescribing has changed over time, and whether efforts to reduce opioid prescribing in response to the opioid crisis have affected patients with cancer at end-of-life in Nova Scotia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8987150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89871502022-04-08 Opioid Use at End-Of-Life Among Nova Scotia Patients With Cancer Minard, Laura V. Fisher, Judith Broadfield, Larry Walsh, Gordon Sketris, Ingrid Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Purpose: To determine the factors associated with opioid analgesic prescriptions as measured by community pharmacy dispensations to all Nova Scotia (NS) patients with cancer at end-of-life from 2005 to 2009. Methods: The NS Cancer Registry and the NS Prescription Monitoring Program (NSPMP) were used to link Nova Scotians who had a cancer diagnosis and received a prescription for opioids in their last year of life (n = 6,186) from 2005 to 2009. The association of factors with opioid dispensations at end-of-life were determined (e.g., patient demographics, type of prescriber, type of cancer, and opioid type, formulation, and dose). Results: Almost 54% (n = 6,186) of the end-of-life study population with cancer (n = 11,498) was linked to the NSPMP and therefore dispensed opioids. Most prescriptions were written by general practitioners (89%) and were for strong opioids (81%). Immediate-release formulations were more common than modified-release formulations. Although the annual average parenteral morphine equivalents (MEQ) did not change during the study period, the number of opioid prescriptions per patient per year increased from 5.9 in 2006 to 7.0 in 2009 (p < 0.0001). Patients age 80 and over received the fewest prescriptions (mean 3.9/year) and the lowest opioid doses (17.0 MEQ) while patients aged 40–49 received the most prescriptions (mean 14.5/year) and the highest doses of opioid (80.2 MEQ). Conclusion: Our study examined opioid analgesic use at end-of-life in patients with cancer for a large real-world population and determined factors, trends and patterns associated with type and dose of opioid dispensed. We provide information regarding how general practitioners prescribe opioid therapy to patients at end-of-life. Our data suggest that at the time of this study, there may have been under-prescribing of opioids to patients with cancer at end-of-life. This information can be used to increase awareness among general practitioners, and to inform recommendations from professional regulatory bodies, to aid in managing pain for cancer patients at end-of-life. Future work could address how opioid prescribing has changed over time, and whether efforts to reduce opioid prescribing in response to the opioid crisis have affected patients with cancer at end-of-life in Nova Scotia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8987150/ /pubmed/35401210 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.836864 Text en Copyright © 2022 Minard, Fisher, Broadfield, Walsh and Sketris. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Minard, Laura V.
Fisher, Judith
Broadfield, Larry
Walsh, Gordon
Sketris, Ingrid
Opioid Use at End-Of-Life Among Nova Scotia Patients With Cancer
title Opioid Use at End-Of-Life Among Nova Scotia Patients With Cancer
title_full Opioid Use at End-Of-Life Among Nova Scotia Patients With Cancer
title_fullStr Opioid Use at End-Of-Life Among Nova Scotia Patients With Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Opioid Use at End-Of-Life Among Nova Scotia Patients With Cancer
title_short Opioid Use at End-Of-Life Among Nova Scotia Patients With Cancer
title_sort opioid use at end-of-life among nova scotia patients with cancer
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8987150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35401210
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.836864
work_keys_str_mv AT minardlaurav opioiduseatendoflifeamongnovascotiapatientswithcancer
AT fisherjudith opioiduseatendoflifeamongnovascotiapatientswithcancer
AT broadfieldlarry opioiduseatendoflifeamongnovascotiapatientswithcancer
AT walshgordon opioiduseatendoflifeamongnovascotiapatientswithcancer
AT sketrisingrid opioiduseatendoflifeamongnovascotiapatientswithcancer